MikroTik

akosenko

Cloud DNS service does not working at all, I confirm from Russia side. Maybe someone from MikroTik team write any news by this issue?

akosenko

If it's still actual then I confirm that R11e-LTE is working under Windows OS (I tested on win10x64). As uldis wrote - modem need to be initialized by send the AT commands. But first we need to install standard win drivers for rndis adapter , like described here https://teleofis.ru/docs/lt40/Content...

akosenko

I confirm this problem too. I get this problem if I use wireless-fp-xxxx-mipsbe.npk or wireless-cm2-xxxx-mipsbe.npk packages in any wireless ap mode (b, b/g, b/g/n). If I use package wireless-xxxx-mipsbe.npk only in b/g ap mode then wpa/wpa2 working fine without any "Unicast key exchange timeou...

akosenko

for queue2 (at your screenshot) change Interface to "all", because you are use bridge, then check.

Also read this to understand simple queue behavior http://forum.mikrotik.com/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=64755. Hope my recommendations will help you.

akosenko

As you can visibly understand from attached video, on interface PPOE-serg we have some traffic about 10 megabits per second, for now doesn’t matter download or upload, and we do not see this kind of traffic in dynamically generated query PPOE-serg, neither download or upload. Yes, you're right. The...

akosenko

In your case TX is your upload traffic (traffic that goes out from pppoe interface) and RX is your download (traffic that incoming to pppoe interface), try to understand this.

Sorry, my English is not good.

akosenko

I think the best connection method is EoIP. See no problem to make all two offices in one network, for example 172.16.1.x/22 ?

akosenko

First the queues will satisfy the limit-at value (regardless of their assigned priority), only after that will the priority enter in play. So, we need set limit-at parameter to 1 to reaching correct work of prioritization? Isn't it? /queue tree add name="download" parent=ether2 packet-mar...

akosenko

All three examples are correct. All as according to the rules described here http://wiki.mikrotik.com/wiki/NetworkPr ... of_Service. And all 3 examples will be working correct with PCQ.

akosenko

Prioritization + PCQ still doesn't work. Without PCQ, prioritization seems to be working. But I need bandwidth control AND prioritization together. need this too and yes - Prioritization + PCQ still doesn't work , I use only PCQ for bandwidth control, without prioritization, this is better than not...

akosenko

as I know - you can't do it on RouterOS, only share maximum bandwidth between active users (use PCQ with rate=0 to archive these)

akosenko

If you use NAT on your router then for pcq upload queue you're must use global-out or global-in interface, not real outgoing interface. In what case used global-in or global-out interface depend of your mangle rules.

akosenko

use add-src-to-address-list - add source address to address list specified by address-list parameter action in IP/Firewall/Filter http://wiki.mikrotik.com/wiki/Manual:IP/Firewall/Filter then allow this address-list in IP/Firewall/Filter forward chain there are no address-list for mac-addresses in ROS

akosenko

2 hel totally agree with you, priorities not work. Set up the queue as well as you, and tested - no result, priorities are not working as they should work in our understanding. I stopped only on the equal bandwith sharing with pcq and queue tree - this is better than nothing. maybe this is help to y...

akosenko

maybe in network located at side of mikrotik has another dslam or pppoe server? describe more clearly your scheme

akosenko

Thanks, good temporary solution, though need to use a scheduler. Well, if the developers have integrated this feature into a PPP-server.

akosenko

Yes, i confirm this. Very uncomfortable, especially when create EoIP tunnel for remote site with dynamic IP-address - I must enter IP-address, if I enter FQDN router resolve it automatically to IP-address. Please developers i beg fix this or do so that the user can configure this.

akosenko

fr0zon , if you use NAT on your router, then you must use globa-in or global-out interfaces for parents, because after SNAT or before DNAT pcq don't know client's addresses. So your config is right, but how write fewi - we're don't have enoght info about your network topology to say 100%. Many user...

akosenko

solution for your situation: PCQ + mangle or Simple Queue, see examples here :

http://wiki.mikrotik.com/wiki/Manual:Qu ... Q_Examples

http://wiki.mikrotik.com/wiki/Manual:Queues_-_PCQ

http://wiki.mikrotik.com/wiki/NetworkPr ... of_Service

akosenko

about response times - only type and size of parent queue (in case of hierarchical queue tree ) affects to response time, set type of parent queue pfifo and very small size or zero and you're see results (type of leaf queues set as pcq and any size - it doesn't change anything)

akosenko

Hi ZoemDoef I'm learn routeros qos about 2 years by myself (I can not afford the courses), because for me quality qos realization is very important, i read many resources and now i can say only one thing - if you want learn and practical apply qos in routeros you must end mikrotik courses, all docum...

akosenko

At first - sorry, maybe you're was read this presentation - HTB QoS by Valens Riyadi, Indonesia http://mum.mikrotik.com/presentations/US09/Valens-MUM2009USA.pdf I think you must set limit-at and max-limit parameters in your prioritization queue tree (sorry for my English), here is what i mean: /////...

akosenko

invalid console command

akosenko

I think you must place prioritization queues separate from other queues and place them in global-in tree, scheme of the tree will look something like this:

parent_queue(global-in interface)
|
prio1 queue
|
prio2 queue
|
...
|
prio8 queue

akosenko

1 name="Total_Upload" parent=ether1 limit-at=0 priority=1 max-limit=8M burst-limit=0 burst-threshold=0 burst-time=0s wrong, you must use global-out interface for parent, see packet flow diagram or you can check how many PCQ queues showed in you leaf queues in queue tree, also you must mar...

akosenko

how can check?

user tracert, pathping commands in your windows OS or mtr command in your Linux OS and look what gateway will be selected.

akosenko

not workinggggg!!

Very weird behavior. On my router (ROS 4.13) this method works very good. Did you try check this config with tracert command?

akosenko

i want to route some site to (ADSL)Ether1 Like youtube.com , facebook.com ,orkut.com and the other whole internet will work on (ISP)Ether2 Why so perverted? :) Simple add route in route table for youtube and point the correct output interface: /ip route add dst-address=74.125.127.93 gateway=Ether1 ...

akosenko

if you're use NAT and PCQ then you must use global-out interface in queue tree for upload traffic, because PCQ must know src-address of your lan-users

akosenko

Zapnologica please, try this example, must help: 1) Mark Upload traffic. If u are use NAT on your router u can mark your upload traffic in mangle prerouting OR mangle forward, OR mangle postrouting (see packet-flow diagram): 1.1) Mangle prerouting: chain=prerouting action=mark-packet new-packet-mar...

akosenko

So what was the problem? Can you describe more?

akosenko

Double click on the firewall rule, then click the Copy button. Make some adjustments in the new rule and click OK. When the problem appears, the new rule is not editable after clicking Copy. Also I have to add, there are not too many firewall rules on our routers, on average 10-20. So it's probably...

akosenko

problem is solved as follows:

/system routerboard settings set focre-backup-router=no

/system routerboard upgrade
/system reboot

P.S. big thanks to Sergejs from MikroTik Support

akosenko

confirm the problem with updating the firmware on my RB493 after installing RouterOS 4.7 and try to update RouterBOOT, after a reboot there is an old firmware version, is this a BUG?

akosenko

maybe you're must change MSS, i.e. like this: ip firewall mangle print Flags: X - disabled, I - invalid, D - dynamic 0 ;;; Change MSS for outgoing traffic chain=postrouting action=change-mss new-mss=1452 tcp-flags=syn protocol=tcp src-address-list=users out-interface=pppoe-out1 tcp-mss=1453-65535

akosenko

Situation was resolved, problem was in pda asus p750 in WM 6.1 power(battery) profile(settings), not in routeros or r52n.

akosenko

Situation was resolved, problem was in pda asus p750 in WM 6.1 power(battery) profile(settings), not in routeros or r52n.

akosenko

11.PNG 19:13:23 wireless,debug wlan1: 00:1E:8C:62:39:2F attempts to associate 19:13:23 wireless,debug wlan1: 00:1E:8C:62:39:2F in local ACL, accept 19:13:23 wireless,info 00:1E:8C:62:39:2F@wlan1: connected 19:14:29 wireless,info 00:1E:8C:62:39:2F@wlan1: disconnected, received deauth: s ending stati...

akosenko

What is your signal, antenna type, noise floor, etc.? Signal post later, but I am at 3 meters from the ap-point (rb493) and on PDA ASUS P750 (wireless client) I see a good signal. Antenna type - indoor mikrotik 2.4-5.8GHz Swivel Antenna, connect to J3 connector on R52N (only one antenna connected)....

akosenko

Hello, please help me. I have RB493 with one R52N card in ap-bridge mode with following configuration: 0 name="wlan1" mtu=1500 mac-address=00:0C:42:3A:D6:64 arp=enabled interface-type=Atheros 11N mode=ap-bridge ssid="MT" frequency=2417 band=2ghz-b/g/n scan-list=default wds-mode=d...

akosenko

Hello, please help me. I have RB493 with one R52N card in ap-bridge mode with following configuration: 0 name="wlan1" mtu=1500 mac-address=00:0C:42:3A:D6:64 arp=enabled interface-type=Atheros 11N mode=ap-bridge ssid="MT" frequency=2417 band=2ghz-b/g/n scan-list=default wds-mode=d...

akosenko

If I'm not mistaken, when you're mark connection first and then mark all packets belong this connection, then in packet marks you're have src-address and dst-address, then apply this packet mark for outgoing or incoming interface and you're have download or upload traffic. In other words you're don'...

akosenko

Big thanks, It's great pdf slides. Continue in the same spirit

, it's very helpful and very clear. I would like to see more information on QoS (simple queue, queue tree, examples, equal bandwidth sharing with NAT), most standard QoS applications.

akosenko

OK I've found this "Equal bandwidth sharing among users" http://www.mikrotik.com/testdocs/ros/2.9/root/queue.php for ROS 2.9 It's very bad example and it doesn't work with NAT. It works only with routing, not NAT. In my case this example doesn't work. I'm found next way to realize equal d...

akosenko

Winbox shows registration happening but no packets are able to be received. I certify that. I'm tried to connect my PDA ASUS P750 to RB493 with R52N + uFl Swivel Antenna and ROS 4.3 - I can't do that or I'm get very unstable link at 5m distance :( . I'm tried ap bridge B/G modes, change antenna-mod...

akosenko

Hi, sorry for my english, my problem is How to make this: "Certain Bandwidth Equal Distribution between Users" in wiki there's no information or example, but i tried http://wiki.mikrotik.com/wiki/PCQ_Examples - Equal Bandwidth for a Number of Users - it's work, but my situation is - i have...

akosenko

I try this configuration http://www.mikrotik.com/testdocs/ros/2.9/root/queue.php for equal bandwidth sharing, but i think this is wrong for my situation. Also i tried another configuration, thats described in http://wiki.mikrotik.com/wiki/Cable_setup But how i can check that is realy equally sharing...

akosenko

Hello mikrotik gurus, at first - sorry my wrestle English. I have next situation: 1) LAN users: 192.168.1.0/24 2) PC router (running RouterOS 2.9.51) with 2 ethernet interfaces (2LAN and 2ADSL), 1 pppoe interface (pppoe0 - puiblic interface looking to Internet) and 1 l2tp interface (l2tp0 looking to...

Search found 48 matches