Thanks faisali. I am aware of the differences between iBGP and eBGP. However Mikrotik seems to be not. In the link you posted, read the 2nd article in "What is the difference between eBGP and iBGP?" 2. Routes learned from eBGP peer will be advertised to other peers (BGP or IBGP); however, ...
To setup iBGP on Mikrotik, there are two settings you have to turn on.. one is "Client to Client Reflection" .. .located under the default bgp instance setting the 2nd one is under the BGP peer setting "Route Reflect" Your input is appreciated! Do those need to be turned on both...
Your question has been asked, discussed and answered before ..... Do a bit of searching on the Forums. e.g. here is one such thread. http://forum.mikrotik.com/viewtopic.php?f=14&t=82738 Btw that link is more about iBGP to eBGP peer. My question is the exact opposite. Routes learned via eBGP is ...
Your question has been asked, discussed and answered before ..... Do a bit of searching on the Forums. e.g. here is one such thread. http://forum.mikrotik.com/viewtopic.php?f=14&t=82738 I already did searching in forums, that link you posted is among the open tabs in my web browser. However tho...
Hello, Router A and B are different ASes and have eBGP peering in between. Router B is not advertising the routes learned from A to Router C which is in the same AS with Router B. Route-reflection does not apply imo because Router A is not an iBGP peer so that its routes can be reflected to Router C...
Now if you want to bond two Ethernet Links which are actually Two Fixed Wireless Links
This is the case in my question.
The OSPF solution is affecting MPLS behaviour, since MPLS has to hear the neighbor's router ID (loopback IP) on the same link.
ITs possible to use many ways to do this, but good old easy rock solid, is LACP. Thanks for your reply! Following is the quote from mikrotik's page for LACP in bonding LACP balances outgoing traffic across the active ports based on hashed protocol header information and accepts incoming traffic fro...
Hello,
In location A, I have mikrotik's 2 ethernet ports connected to Location B mikrotik's 2 ethernet ports.
Is it possible to multilink the ethernet ports, and set one port to upstream only and the other one downstream only?
Hello, I saw a bonding tab in the GUI so apparently mikrotik can do multilink. In location A, I have mikrotik's 2 ethernet ports connected to Location B mikrotik's 2 ethernet ports. Is it possible to multilink the ethernet ports, and set one port to upstream only and the other one downstream only? T...
Hello, In order to be able to route the packets based on marking to pppoe1 connection, I need to have a manual route in table with matching marking. In order to create that route and make it work, I uncheck the "Add Default Route" option in pppoe connection settings, so that my manual rout...
Hello, Simple question. When a failure occurs on backbone, OSPF does its thing and stops forwarding traffic to failed gateway creating a new route to a different gateway. If MPLS is not in action, everything would work excellent! However MPLS is unable to keep up with OSPF in case of failovers. Its ...
Hello,
Have just configured a PCC loadbalancing and its working fine.
I can reach mikrotik from inside, however can neither ping its public ip nor reach via winbox from internet.
Any suggestions?
I am running it on some random port like 8495.
I am not doing anything extra to run it. So it auto-starts as the way expected from the tutorial. Is there a way to check if it is started with root privs ?
I googled but found almost nothing about creating additional layers for a network map. The only 2 are links and dependencies and it doesnt seem to exist a button/setting that I can add.
Any ideas?
Thanks for the reply dynstatic, however I ve already followed that guide to setup the dude.
As mentioned, everything works fine. I can connect to dude server with client software.
The problem is web access is not working. When I enable it is dude settings, nothing happens
Hello,
I installed Dude v4 on CentOS and everything working fine except the web access. No matter what I do, I cant make it work. It is never listed as listening on specified port on netstat -anl
Appreciate your help
Thanks mrz, All OSPF interfaces are in their respective different subnets. It is happening right in front of my eyes, absolutely no sense. I see that 1 ping out of 100 hardly ever successes with a very high latency. May it be sending the hello packet right at that time and keeping the adjacency?
Hello, I witnessed a strange behaviour on Mikrotik 450G v5.2 Two mikrotiks, directly connected interfaces via wireless, in same subnet, say one of them is 192.168.1.1 and the other one is 192.168.1.2 They can ping&telnet each other, OSPF neighborship is up, interfaces configured as point to poin...
Intelligent Delay-Managed Packet Queuing and Flow Sequence Recovery Engine protocols for bonding different types of medias and bandwiths. I believe this would be a huge improvement.
Hello, We are using an extra linux box with custom configuration as aggregators to achieve bonding of different medias with asymmetric and nonmatching bandwiths. For example we are bonding a cable modem using ethernet 15/1,5 and a DSL connection 8/2 into a single connection roughly 23/3,5 that you s...
I had this problem in 4.0 beta, downgraded to stable version 3.6, but the problem is still there. Platform is windows 64 bit Dude is connected to devices with snmp v2 profile. When I want to create link between two routers, lets say router A's eth1 to router B's eth2, it simply does not work! Interf...
I found out that if I choose eth2 on one side, it automatically chooses eth2 on the other side, but eth2 is not the interface of this link. Can someone at least confirm that this is a bug so i can leave it.
Hello, v4.0 beta3 for windows. routeros mode not snmp. I add a manual link between devices. In settings of the link, I choose one device and chose its interface and apply, then choose the other end from dropdown and choose its interface. But once I click apply, the previous setting i did for remote ...
Hello, Is there a way to manipulate the costs of interfaces, or the metric of the routes according to the bandwidth utilization and delay of the link dynamically? Like Cisco's PfR solution? Does Mikrotik have a routing protocol or a type of solution which can do unequal cost load balancing except BG...