Community discussions

MikroTik App

Search found 17 matches

by lionspy
Mon Feb 13, 2012 9:27 pm
Forum: General
Topic: ROS 5.10 - 5.12 very unstable as pptp BRAS on an x86.
Replies: 33
Views: 6793

Re: ROS 5.10 - 5.12 very unstable as pptp BRAS on an x86.

Cool that you tested with different motherboards. At the time the problem happens - grab a supout.rif and send to support. If it is truly a bug they should simply fix it in the next RouterOS release or sooner by providing you a custom version. Cheers. it's no sense to sending supout.rif - I've send...
by lionspy
Sat Feb 11, 2012 8:38 pm
Forum: General
Topic: ROS 5.10 - 5.12 very unstable as pptp BRAS on an x86.
Replies: 33
Views: 6793

Re: ROS 5.10 - 5.12 very unstable as pptp BRAS on an x86.

similar results on intel G33 (Gigabyte) & intel G41 (Asus). seems to me - it's userlevel code of pptp server software on mikrotik. I've tested this box in both pptp (all users) + 2-3 pppoe tunnels (test users, 1 mschapv2+mppe + 2 md5 chap without mppe), in pppoe throughput was near 100M, this lo...
by lionspy
Fri Feb 10, 2012 8:43 pm
Forum: General
Topic: ROS 5.10 - 5.12 very unstable as pptp BRAS on an x86.
Replies: 33
Views: 6793

Re: ROS 5.10 - 5.12 very unstable as pptp BRAS on an x86.

That system has built-in NAT and hasn't BGP.
Self-made, not by me.
by lionspy
Thu Feb 09, 2012 9:59 pm
Forum: General
Topic: ROS 5.10 - 5.12 very unstable as pptp BRAS on an x86.
Replies: 33
Views: 6793

Re: ROS 5.10 - 5.12 very unstable as pptp BRAS on an x86.

i'm moved from slackware +2.6.23 kernel + accel-pptp 0.8.5 + self-made billing (all settings and DB, statistics in mysql, lot of perl scripts) with NAT on this Q6600 + 2 100 Mbit intel desktop NIC's and 80-95 MBps peak traffic load to ROS 3.30 + Abills billing + 2 D-link DGE-530T NIC's (marvell?).+ ...
by lionspy
Wed Feb 08, 2012 10:38 pm
Forum: General
Topic: ROS 5.10 - 5.12 very unstable as pptp BRAS on an x86.
Replies: 33
Views: 6793

Re: ROS 5.10 - 5.12 very unstable as pptp BRAS on an x86.

Yes, it still happen. The problem exist when any pptp user (it's may be only 1 user, may be few users) exceeds speed of 20-25 MBps. 100% LA on 1 of cores of CPU, moving from 1 core to another. when all users running at 6MBps it's all right, load normally balanced by CPU cores. But in this case overa...
by lionspy
Tue Feb 07, 2012 12:35 pm
Forum: General
Topic: ROS 5.10 - 5.12 very unstable as pptp BRAS on an x86.
Replies: 33
Views: 6793

Re: ROS 5.10 - 5.12 very unstable as pptp BRAS on an x86.

I like these optimisation tips. Good info. When you allocated IRQs to cores, can you tell if the core that goes to 100% is the one with the RTL8169 IRQ allocated to it? >>no, i can't tell that - 100% LA core moves randomly, and independently from core, serving for Realtek. Does mutli-queue-etherhet...
by lionspy
Mon Feb 06, 2012 8:51 pm
Forum: General
Topic: ROS v6 Suggestions
Replies: 76
Views: 30128

Re: ROS v6 Suggestions

I would like to see a new linux kernel with built-in accel-ppp driver.
by lionspy
Mon Feb 06, 2012 8:43 pm
Forum: General
Topic: Stable package on X86
Replies: 8
Views: 2461

Re: Stable package on X86

+1 for that.
ROS 5.10 - 5.12 very unstable in ppp, we had 3 hungs than we downgrade to 5.6
by lionspy
Mon Feb 06, 2012 8:27 pm
Forum: General
Topic: ROS 5.10 - 5.12 very unstable as pptp BRAS on an x86.
Replies: 33
Views: 6793

Re: ROS 5.10 - 5.12 very unstable as pptp BRAS on an x86.

there is their answer! Hello, 1) in /queue interface menu set all queues to multi-queue-ethernet-default >> i change ethernet interfaces queues to multi-queue-ethernet-default. doesn't affected on router behavior. I don't know how i can change queue type from "default-small" to multi-queue...
by lionspy
Mon Feb 06, 2012 8:08 pm
Forum: General
Topic: PPTP Bugs
Replies: 1
Views: 802

Re: PPTP Bugs

possible, Mikrotik uses userspace PPTP client & server software. I have a lot of problems, mainly stability & performance issues on my Q6600 + ROS 5.6, 5.10, 5.11, 5.12 as PPTP bras. When i use a free Slackware Linux + accel-pptp (0.8.5!) i never seen a 100% LA on 1 of cores of my CPU. When ...
by lionspy
Sat Feb 04, 2012 8:55 pm
Forum: General
Topic: how can i disable MPPE on server side?
Replies: 4
Views: 3030

how can i disable MPPE on server side?

I want to disable MPPE encryption for client connections. Under ppp profiles I've disabled encryption both in default profile & default-encryption profiles, but winbox shows that client connections are still encrypted. How can I solve my problem? When client autheticates via mschapv2 - it have m...
by lionspy
Wed Feb 01, 2012 10:36 am
Forum: General
Topic: ROS 5.10 - 5.12 very unstable as pptp BRAS on an x86.
Replies: 33
Views: 6793

Re: ROS 5.10 - 5.12 very unstable as pptp BRAS on an x86.

"+ rtl8169 NIC for communication with billing server, (radius protocol)".
it's ether6 interface with traffic = 30-40 kBps (max 50 pps)
by lionspy
Mon Jan 30, 2012 9:36 pm
Forum: General
Topic: ROS 5.10 - 5.12 very unstable as pptp BRAS on an x86.
Replies: 33
Views: 6793

Re: ROS 5.10 - 5.12 very unstable as pptp BRAS on an x86.

It's a daily loadings of the backbone interface. (ether4)
interface is limited at 200Mbps by our provider.
by lionspy
Mon Jan 30, 2012 9:21 pm
Forum: General
Topic: ROS 5.10 - 5.12 very unstable as pptp BRAS on an x86.
Replies: 33
Views: 6793

Re: ROS 5.10 - 5.12 very unstable as pptp BRAS on an x86.

this is the 100% LA on a random core of CPU
by lionspy
Sun Jan 29, 2012 8:28 pm
Forum: General
Topic: ROS 5.10 - 5.12 very unstable as pptp BRAS on an x86.
Replies: 33
Views: 6793

Re: ROS 5.10 - 5.12 very unstable as pptp BRAS on an x86.

i found where i can disable RPS
System - Resources - RPS
by lionspy
Sun Jan 29, 2012 4:19 pm
Forum: General
Topic: ROS 5.10 - 5.12 very unstable as pptp BRAS on an x86.
Replies: 33
Views: 6793

ROS 5.10 - 5.12 very unstable as pptp BRAS on an x86.

ROS 5.10 - 5.12 very unstable as pptp BRAS on an x86. every 5-12 hours i see a a soft lockup on a random core of the cpu, after that whole system hangs. ROS 5.11 have much more performance on my BRAS (about 150+ Mbps, than it hangs). supout.rif does not creates in case of hangup. ROS 5.6 seems to be...