hAP ac² LAN->WiFi 5GHz performance issue.

I’ve bought hAP ac^2, configured it and got an issue: transferring speed from LAN device (micro server with 1 Gbps eth) to Wi-Fi 5GHz device is VERY low and unstable: 0.5..2..5..20..50 Mbps, tested with two 5GHz devices with iperf3.
At the same time transferring speed from LAN device to Wi-Fi 2.4GHz device is OK: around 40..50 Mbps.
In addition:
WAN → LAN (server) = 800..900 Mbps
LAN (server) → WAN = 200..300 Mbps
WAN → Wi-Fi 5GHz (device 1) ~ 200 Mbps
Wi-Fi 5GHz (device 1) → WAN ~ 220 Mbps
WAN → Wi-Fi 5GHz (device 2) ~ 150 Mbps
Wi-Fi 5GHz (device 2) → WAN ~ 170 Mbps

For testing purposes, I’ve completely reset router’s configuration, applied default one.
I didn’t make ANY changes to the default config.
I got the same result: awful LAN->Wi-Fi-5GHz performance.
Laptop performance (via hAP ac2 Wi-Fi 5GHz ↔ WAN):
http://www.speedtest.net/result/7182653292
20180329202204U5c7.png

Server performance (via hAP ac2: LAN ↔ WAN):
root@server:~# speedtest-cli
Retrieving speedtest.net configuration…
Testing from Lanet Network Ltd (176.38.50.85)…
Retrieving speedtest.net server list…
Selecting best server based on ping…
Hosted by Adamant Ltd. (Kiev) [0.52 km]: 9.235 ms
Testing download speed…
Download: 783.33 Mbit/s
Testing upload speed…
Upload: 815.18 Mbit/s

And LAN->Wi-Fi-5GHz (laptop) performance:
root@server:~# iperf3 -c 192.168.88.253
Connecting to host 192.168.88.253, port 5201
[ 4] local 192.168.88.252 port 44302 connected to 192.168.88.253 port 5201
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth Retr Cwnd
[ 4] 0.00-1.00 sec 1.21 MBytes 10.1 Mbits/sec 11 1.43 KBytes
[ 4] 1.00-2.00 sec 4.54 MBytes 38.1 Mbits/sec 21 85.5 KBytes
[ 4] 2.00-3.00 sec 1.64 MBytes 13.8 Mbits/sec 0 108 KBytes
[ 4] 3.00-4.00 sec 3.12 MBytes 26.2 Mbits/sec 37 237 KBytes
[ 4] 4.00-5.00 sec 2.82 MBytes 23.6 Mbits/sec 41 24.2 KBytes
[ 4] 5.00-6.00 sec 4.24 MBytes 35.6 Mbits/sec 28 1.43 KBytes
[ 4] 6.00-7.00 sec 6.98 MBytes 58.6 Mbits/sec 54 1.43 KBytes
[ 4] 7.00-8.00 sec 13.1 MBytes 110 Mbits/sec 64 68.4 KBytes
[ 4] 8.00-9.00 sec 980 KBytes 8.03 Mbits/sec 36 69.9 KBytes
[ 4] 9.00-10.00 sec 5.09 MBytes 42.7 Mbits/sec 13 1.43 KBytes


[ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth Retr
[ 4] 0.00-10.00 sec 43.7 MBytes 36.7 Mbits/sec 305 sender
[ 4] 0.00-10.00 sec 43.2 MBytes 36.3 Mbits/sec receiver

iperf Done.

*What’s wrong with LAN (server) → Wi-Fi 5GHz (device ) ?!
When will this be fixed?

supout.rif.zip (723 KB)

I have the same problem with hap ac2. 2.4 GHz and 5.2 GHz work poorly, speed is unstable.

@normis,
Any solution?
Should I return the router?

Can you provide more detail statitic ?

  1. registration table statistic : http://forum.mikrotik.com/t/mikrotik-cap-ac-performance-review/117477/22
  2. registration table signal : http://forum.mikrotik.com/t/bad-wireless-reception-with-rb2011uas-2hnd-in/62979/1
  3. chanel overlap http://forum.mikrotik.com/t/bad-wireless-reception-with-rb2011uas-2hnd-in/62979/1
  4. speed test results
  5. which equipment you are using
  6. which ROS version

I’m trying test 3cAP ac, via CapsMan, and see same performance issues…

There is tests, with no changes :
Download 95.72Mbps Upload 20.40Mbps
Download 180.74Mbps Upload 152.15Mbps
Download 185.61Mbps Upload 218.71Mbps
Download 257.16Mbps Upload 262.10Mbps

Ceee5180
Download 253.68Mbps Upload 270.94Mbps
eCee5200
Download 112.55Mbps Upload 64.57Mbps
eeCe5220
Download 157.95Mbps Upload 273.95Mbps
eeeC5240
Download 123.96Mbps Upload 62.53Mbps



But some times i got :
Download 373.18Mbps Upload 531.18Mbps

20180401230345e6d5.png
2.
2018040123023924E9.png
3.
20180401230657q4A0.png
4. http://www.speedtest.net/result/7182653292 and http://www.speedtest.net/result/a/3792054297 , see 1st post
5. Intel AC-7260, Xiaomi Redmi Note 3 Pro ( http://www.speedtest.net/result/a/3792054297 )
6. 6.42rc52

It’s not Wi-Fi link issue.
It’s LAN-WiFi 5GHz issue, because bought Laptop and Phone shows the same problem with LAN-WiFi 5GHz connection.
And there was NO the issue like described with hAP ac.

The same tests with my phone and server.
Screenshot_JuiceSSH_20180401-234245.png
Screenshot_Speedtest_20180401-234200.png
Screenshot_Magic_iPerf_20180401-234131.png
Upload speed from server is lower, because vlan is configured for internet connection, BTW why so slow?
With default ROS config speed is around 800..900 Mbps up and down (from server to internet and backward).

Hey Mikrotik! Any answer?

Can you perform test with changed chanel width?

Ceee5180
eCee5200
eeCe5220
eeeC5240
?

Also Intel 7260 slow performance :

http://www.troublefixers.org/laptops/fix-intel-wireless-7260-ac-wifi-speed-issues-in-windows-10/679/

https://communities.intel.com/thread/59726

Intel 7260 slow - ha-ha!
It works perfectly with hAP ac (I got stable 200..220 Mbps with it) and many other routers. As well as Xiaomi Redmi Note 3 works perfectly with hAP ac (on 5GHz).

The test results you asked for are below, as expected nothing changed.
Also, please check this link http://forum.mikrotik.com/t/hap-ac-2-problems-extremely-poor-performance-found-in-2-4g-and-5g-wifi/118063/9


C:\Users\nemof\Desktop\iperf-3.1.3-win64>iperf3.exe -c 10.10.10.253 -R
Connecting to host 10.10.10.253, port 5201
Reverse mode, remote host 10.10.10.253 is sending
[ 4] local 10.10.10.95 port 53670 connected to 10.10.10.253 port 5201
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth
[ 4] 0.00-1.00 sec 4.97 MBytes 41.6 Mbits/sec
[ 4] 1.00-2.00 sec 3.87 MBytes 32.5 Mbits/sec
[ 4] 2.00-3.00 sec 4.38 MBytes 36.8 Mbits/sec
[ 4] 3.00-4.00 sec 2.87 MBytes 24.1 Mbits/sec
[ 4] 4.00-5.00 sec 3.67 MBytes 30.7 Mbits/sec
[ 4] 5.00-6.00 sec 2.29 MBytes 19.2 Mbits/sec
[ 4] 6.00-7.00 sec 2.65 MBytes 22.2 Mbits/sec
[ 4] 7.00-8.00 sec 2.31 MBytes 19.4 Mbits/sec
[ 4] 8.00-9.00 sec 3.33 MBytes 27.9 Mbits/sec
[ 4] 9.00-10.00 sec 3.19 MBytes 26.8 Mbits/sec


[ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth Retr
[ 4] 0.00-10.00 sec 34.3 MBytes 28.7 Mbits/sec 70 sender
[ 4] 0.00-10.00 sec 33.7 MBytes 28.2 Mbits/sec receiver

iperf Done.

C:\Users\nemof\Desktop\iperf-3.1.3-win64>iperf3.exe -c 10.10.10.253 -R
Connecting to host 10.10.10.253, port 5201
Reverse mode, remote host 10.10.10.253 is sending
[ 4] local 10.10.10.95 port 53678 connected to 10.10.10.253 port 5201
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth
[ 4] 0.00-1.00 sec 643 KBytes 5.26 Mbits/sec
[ 4] 1.00-2.00 sec 436 KBytes 3.57 Mbits/sec
[ 4] 2.00-3.00 sec 2.34 MBytes 19.6 Mbits/sec
[ 4] 3.00-4.00 sec 1.51 MBytes 12.7 Mbits/sec
[ 4] 4.00-5.00 sec 4.38 MBytes 36.7 Mbits/sec
[ 4] 5.00-6.00 sec 5.36 MBytes 45.0 Mbits/sec
[ 4] 6.00-7.00 sec 2.39 MBytes 20.1 Mbits/sec
[ 4] 7.00-8.00 sec 5.41 MBytes 45.2 Mbits/sec
[ 4] 8.00-9.00 sec 8.07 MBytes 67.8 Mbits/sec
[ 4] 9.00-10.00 sec 16.6 MBytes 139 Mbits/sec


[ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth Retr
[ 4] 0.00-10.00 sec 47.6 MBytes 39.9 Mbits/sec 233 sender
[ 4] 0.00-10.00 sec 47.1 MBytes 39.5 Mbits/sec receiver

iperf Done.

C:\Users\nemof\Desktop\iperf-3.1.3-win64>iperf3.exe -c 10.10.10.253 -R
Connecting to host 10.10.10.253, port 5201
Reverse mode, remote host 10.10.10.253 is sending
[ 4] local 10.10.10.95 port 53678 connected to 10.10.10.253 port 5201
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth
[ 4] 0.00-1.00 sec 643 KBytes 5.26 Mbits/sec
[ 4] 1.00-2.00 sec 436 KBytes 3.57 Mbits/sec
[ 4] 2.00-3.00 sec 2.34 MBytes 19.6 Mbits/sec
[ 4] 3.00-4.00 sec 1.51 MBytes 12.7 Mbits/sec
[ 4] 4.00-5.00 sec 4.38 MBytes 36.7 Mbits/sec
[ 4] 5.00-6.00 sec 5.36 MBytes 45.0 Mbits/sec
[ 4] 6.00-7.00 sec 2.39 MBytes 20.1 Mbits/sec
[ 4] 7.00-8.00 sec 5.41 MBytes 45.2 Mbits/sec
[ 4] 8.00-9.00 sec 8.07 MBytes 67.8 Mbits/sec
[ 4] 9.00-10.00 sec 16.6 MBytes 139 Mbits/sec


[ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth Retr
[ 4] 0.00-10.00 sec 47.6 MBytes 39.9 Mbits/sec 233 sender
[ 4] 0.00-10.00 sec 47.1 MBytes 39.5 Mbits/sec receiver

iperf Done.

C:\Users\nemof\Desktop\iperf-3.1.3-win64>iperf3.exe -c 10.10.10.253 -R
Connecting to host 10.10.10.253, port 5201
Reverse mode, remote host 10.10.10.253 is sending
[ 4] local 10.10.10.95 port 53678 connected to 10.10.10.253 port 5201
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth
[ 4] 0.00-1.00 sec 643 KBytes 5.26 Mbits/sec
[ 4] 1.00-2.00 sec 436 KBytes 3.57 Mbits/sec
[ 4] 2.00-3.00 sec 2.34 MBytes 19.6 Mbits/sec
[ 4] 3.00-4.00 sec 1.51 MBytes 12.7 Mbits/sec
[ 4] 4.00-5.00 sec 4.38 MBytes 36.7 Mbits/sec
[ 4] 5.00-6.00 sec 5.36 MBytes 45.0 Mbits/sec
[ 4] 6.00-7.00 sec 2.39 MBytes 20.1 Mbits/sec
[ 4] 7.00-8.00 sec 5.41 MBytes 45.2 Mbits/sec
[ 4] 8.00-9.00 sec 8.07 MBytes 67.8 Mbits/sec
[ 4] 9.00-10.00 sec 16.6 MBytes 139 Mbits/sec


[ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth Retr
[ 4] 0.00-10.00 sec 47.6 MBytes 39.9 Mbits/sec 233 sender
[ 4] 0.00-10.00 sec 47.1 MBytes 39.5 Mbits/sec receiver

iperf Done.

We are making a decision - not to buy MikroTik, as always AP to buy Ubiquiti

It’s interesting to get feedback about FT and Unifi series..

https://help.ubnt.com/hc/en-us/articles/115004662107-UniFi-Fast-Roaming

Mikrotik,

Any official answer?

Intel ac 8260 - the same issue.

Mikrotik?

Intel ac 8260 - 2018-02-06, 20.40.0.4
20180409_200021 - Copy.jpg
Untitled.png

equipment mounted pointing up !!!with very good speed…

so there is two tests, one test and after few seconds - second test.

no change, no move just chrome open new tab and repteat test

so wehere is comment from MT ? :smiley:
spt.png

I’m a bit tired repeating this again and again, but…

This is a user forum. Period. Mikrotik staff may occasionally answer some questions here, but they do not have to. If you need an “official answer” you should write you question to support@. I’m afraid that’s the only “official way” to ask you questions.

Have you got any reply from MikroTik Support?

YH

The first valued answer since 29 March.
Screen Shot 2018-04-12 at 17.17.32.png
Screen Shot 2018-04-12 at 17.20.48.png

andriys: as you are an official MikroTik employee, could you please raise up an idea of creation an official communication channel MikroTik → users? IMHO if everyone who has any question should write to support@ then you would not do anything else just responding to e-mails.
I (and definitely I am not the only one) think that this could be beneficial to both - MikroTik and also its users.

It seams the email to support is the only way, because they have a ticketing system there and maybe some people that do the filtering above that to ensure nothing will be lost and everything will be replied at least somehow. I think that such way is quite secure but not fast enough. Other ways could loose tracking. And as you see, mikrotik is able to react officially here on the forum if they wish. Unfortunately they do not wish at given time or do not know how to react many times.