Improved PPP package for v6.x

For some while now we have been working on new PPP package for RouterOS. Main goal was to improve
speed and stability. Package was tested in our internal networks and by some our dev build testers.
Speed and stability improvements apply mainly for multicore devices.

Note:

  • we will appreciate reports for new ppp package to support@mikrotik.com
  • package should not be used at production environment;
  • v6.rc7 PPP changes will be included 6.8 or v6.9 release (not at 6.7 web release).

Development build download links:
http://www.mikrotik.com/download/share/routeros-tile-6.7rc2.npk
http://www.mikrotik.com/download/share/routeros-powerpc-6.7rc2.npk
http://www.mikrotik.com/download/share/routeros-x86-6.7rc2.npk
http://www.mikrotik.com/download/share/routeros-mipsbe-6.7rc2.npk
http://www.mikrotik.com/download/share/routeros-mipsle-6.7rc2.npk

ppp-v7 packages:
http://www.mikrotik.com/download/share/ppp-v7-6.7rc2-ppc.npk
http://www.mikrotik.com/download/share/ppp-v7-6.7rc2-tile.npk
http://www.mikrotik.com/download/share/ppp-v7-6.7rc2.npk
http://www.mikrotik.com/download/share/ppp-v7-6.7rc2-mipsbe.npk
http://www.mikrotik.com/download/share/ppp-v7-6.7rc2-mipsle.npk

All files archive:
http://www.mikrotik.com/download/share/all_files_6.7rc2.zip

V7?

ppp_v7 package improvements consist of 2 parts:

*) ppp_v7 package should provide additional improvement in PPPOE, PPTP and L2TP interface management.
*) upgrades in the drivers and Kernel, that should deliver improvement in traffic throughput performance on those interfaces.

Improvements will be seen on all supported architectures, but highest performance improvements will be seen especially on multicore systems

Have someone perform any tests on xen?
Do it add any extra features, options to UI?

on 951g-2hnd i have lower speed than with routeros v6.6 when connected with pppoe client

x86 random reboot ,40 pptp session…

Does PPPoE option 82 http://forum.mikrotik.com/t/feature-request-pppoe-option-82/38611/1 included ?

Also Umetered Content for PPPoE . ‘Unmetered Content’ services aren’t counted against your monthly download inclusion . added to feature request page

There are no new features in there. Only performance optimizations for multicore routers (like TILE, x86 and PPC), single core should also see some improvement, but not comparable to multicore solutions.

In our internal testing there where great speed improvements.

Please send your reports to support@mikrotik.com along with support output file so we can see your configuration and analyze the results.

Doesn’t receive any response from support@mikrotik.com. Maybe auto-reply is disabled now.
It seems that Ovpn doesn’t work.

Never really had problem with pppoe on 5.x. Haven’t moved to v6 on core/edge.
I have 700 pppoe sessions and on core i3 not too much CPU usage even moving 130-140 megabit.
Each customer gets advertised speed

I’m not sure how it could get better? Is this more geared for tile?
My CPU is only 2 cores.

hope after ppp there will be the case of routing on manycores.

earlier then v7.
Thanks
Ros

Please no.

Major new features on new releases only!

Status of PPPoE session is displayed incomplete

IP Addresses and MRRU are missing
Status incomplete.tiff (30.5 KB)

I dont know is this is related, but yesterday i tried to change a Dell x86 (5.25) accting as pppoe server to a CCR (6.5). All work well in 5.25, but in 6.5 no one of the clients that get a subnet allocation, worked. All clients with a single ip was ok.

The NAS put an error telling “could not determe remote ip”. Something have changed from 5.x to 6.x? Since this is in production, im not that happy to test the new package unless someone might confirm that this work in the new 6.7? (i put the dell back)

I have not tested 6.x on the dell to se if its the same problem in x86 as tilera


Update:

Upgrade x86 to 6.6, seems to work.

COA will be implemented?

I have tested the supplied packages and it did not work out for me!

I’ve first upgraded two routerboards to version 6.7rc2 and then uploaded the ppp-v7 package.
Still get the error "could not add bridge port is not allowed to be put in bridge (6).

I will send supout.rif of both devices to MT support

+1 for COA.

We can’t make some kind of “Turbo button” service without this.

+1 for CoA .

+1 for COA