/interface list usage question

Hello

I would like to ask for an advice about usage of /interface list feature. I have ether ports 1-8 in a bridge-LAN. I want to add some of these ports into /interface list, so I could use this list in FW rules to have more granular control (not having to use the whole bridge-LAN interface). If I assign ether ports 1 and 2 into an interface list, and then I use this list in FW rule, it is skipped. However, when I specify “include=all” for this interface list, it is working fine, but now it ignores that the assigned ether ports are only 1 and 2 and it accepts all of the ether ports.

I seem to be missing something fundamental here, but I cannot find what it is. Maybe it cannot be even used like this, because the ports are already in bridge-LAN and in this case only whole bridge can be used in FW rules?
Would you be so kind and clarify this for me? Thank you.

# apr/12/2019 10:15:49 by RouterOS 6.44.2
#
# model = RB4011iGS+5HacQ2HnD
/interface list
add include=all name=Ethernet-LAN
/interface list member
add interface=ether1 list=Ethernet-LAN
add interface=ether2 list=Ethernet-LAN

Ports under bridge are “slaves”, and can’t be addressed independently. One can only address the bridge. So you can’t match on only some ports of the bridge.

Thank you for the answer. So it is as I assumed. This means that interface lists can only be used with interfaces which are not part of any bridge configuration. However, I have not found this info anywhere, so I though that it might work.