Hello…
i wanna make about 10 AP with The Same SSID So users where ever move can always be connected
The AP will complete a circle around a Neighborhood
Frequency to be used is 2.4
but this way is not Effective because of self interference
any Ideals please?
Yes, you should make them all the SAME SSID! That is correct! However, you should alternate channels 1,6,11 to reduce interference. Same SSID does not cause interference. Using the same channel to close together does. So, alternate channels if you can.
Also, you should implement WDS so that clients can actually roam around the neighborhood while connected without dropping out as they move from AP to AP. This is optional, as most people stay in one place while using their laptops… and the dropout is only minor while switching from AP to AP without WDS.
As I understand it: WDS allows a single radio to serve as both AP and backhaul, and enables seamless client handoff from one AP to the next–at the cost of reduced network performance (protocol overhead, retransmission, and interference from all APs using the same channel).
Bridging the APs will yield better performance (allows non-overlapping channels, requires separate wlan/ether backhaul)–but when the client moves from one AP’s coverage area to another’s, it may drop connections when it disassociates & reassociates, even if the SSIDs (and security profiles, if any) are the same.
You can use WDS with dual radios… you can even use WDS over CAT5 to join wireless radios. It doesn’t have to be a single radio. It can, but it cuts the bandwidth in half. WDS is great! It keeps the mac-addresses known throughout the system so arp and such isn’t a problem when you move from one AP to the next.
0ldman, WDS allows seamless roaming between wireless access points. The way those access points are connected to each other may be wireless or wired… but the client (laptop) will be wireless and can roam between them without interruption.
Without WDS, the roaming is momentairly interrupted as the laptop disconnects from one access point and reconnects to the next one.
That is one purpose of WDS… to allow seamless roaming. Now, whether or not they need seamless roaming, that is another question.
So what would be the best setup for covering a building with lets say about 8 to 10 MT (or any other) APs which can all be conected to a switch with UTP cable and keep good performance with as much connection loss (disconects when switching AP’s) or bandwith penalty?
set the same SSID on all of them and allign them on different non overlaping channels but do NOT enable WDS ?
set the same SSID on all of them and allign them on different non overlaping channels but DO enable WDS?
set the same SSID on all of them and allign them on same channel and use WDS?
do not use the same SSID and let the user roam? - sure we can do better.
mesh?
?
I’m puzzled reading all the posts … can wds help to improve roaming process between multiple LAN connected APs using sames SSID and security profiles?
Found this thread on google. We have 3 MT routers 1 3011 and 2 cAP Wireless routers. However, our Fibre and DHCP is run by a netgate SG5100.
I hope someone can help or point me in the right direction to setup CAPsMAN on the 3011, and then have the 2 cAP routers on one SSID. The only guides I find seems to make that I have to have the DHCP on the 3011.
Expect the 2.4 radio to have problems with that many connections. (Mikrotik has some of the worst interference mitigation I have seen) and the 2.4 radios really take it hard.