NEW RouterBOARD high performance devices - RouterBOARD 333 AND RouterBOARD 1000 - this is announced by mail, for the USA MUM.
Any preview on these ?
Any sheet ?
on routerboard.com nothing. yet.
We are expecting them.
someone tell us RB333 detail info , I just konw this board faster than RB532 2-3x
first announcement will come in the MUM.
Well… that’s a loooooooooooong way, many thousand miles…
Will they be available after the mum ?
i dont think they will be available after any MUM , cose its a very top secrect project , they will make it and keep it in thier secret lockers ..
i dont know why keeping these secrets untill the holy MUM ?
would MT competitors be dead after the MUM ??
the secret is a key incentive so that there is much concurrence in the MUM 
I am going from Argentina to the Orlando MUM to know about this first 
Regards!
Alessio
I do understand you, but after checking i followed plan B
Wait next day, and use the money saved by the plane ticket to order the routerboards
As far as I know there was a roadmap presented at MUM in Krakow which took place in January. There are some shots from the presentation:
http://www.czfree-ol.net/forum/viewtopic.php?p=2745#2745
I think Plan B is not such a good idea, because nobody has released any availability details yet 
Not many money I’m training in Mexico invited by the Index Datacom Training Center to work here in the Monterrey Training recently finished, but in May 28th i’ll be back again to Argentina by personal problems 
but i’m an organizer and trainer of the MUM Argentina 2007 in september
We will entertain in Argentina with rich meat and good wines!
Good luck, good MUM and enjoy!
Alessio
I must say i hope that availability is “very soon”, as i (and i’m pretty sure i’m not the only only) do need some (much) more power than an RB532 can provide at this time.
I’d love to stick to an RB product, but if have no idea when they’ll be available i’ll be forced to buy something else in the meantime, i cannot answer “sorry, the new RB are not out yet” to my customers .
Bye,
Ricky
Well, it depends what is “a lot” for you
I’d love to go to the MUM, and i really regret missing it, but more than 2000$ just for the flight + the staying is not exactly what i would qualify as cheap
Bye,
Ricky
Of course, but like i say, i was “invited” to Mexico )
Only spend the flight from here to Orlando, this is very more cheap
Bye
Alessio
So is it going to take 2 months from today for the details to leak out of MUM or will details be posted on the web today?
As far as what the agenda for Orlando mum is telling us I expect the new RouterBOARDs will be presented on Friday at 16:00 local time. I am also looking with some kind of hope for the new boards.
Here are some pic’s I took.. Warning.. they are large..
RB333 and RB1000 are PPC based boards. I’m not sure about the RB600..
RB333 had 3 mini pci and 3 ethernet, and a 600mhz processor
RB1000 is a 1333mhz processor and has 4 gigabit ethernet ports, a memory slot (not sure if DDR or DDR2 or what), a CF slot, and no mini pci slots..
RB600 has 4 mini pci, not sure how many ethernet but I’ll go look in a few minutes..
http://www.shelbywireless.com/pictures/Orlando_MUM_2007/
enjoy but don’t hold me to the spec’s I’m just repeating what I’ve heard.
-Gerard
Edited and added pictures inline. You can still visit the link above to see more pictures as well as the high resolution originals..
Also Mikrotik added later on in the MUM that the packet rates quoted are for ETHERNET interfaces..
Info from Gerard at Orlando MUM.
Release dates
333 : PowerPC, 600Mhz, 10/100, 3 to 4 weeks
600 : PowerPC, 800Mhz, 3x 10/100/1000, will take 532 daughter cards, 2x CF, 3 to 4 months
1000 : PowerPC, 1333Mhz, 3x10/100/1000, DDR2 up to 2 GB, No built in miniPCI, CPU has Fan, 6 months
I forgot to mention the rb1000 should be released in approx 6 months..
-Gerard
Normis, I wanted the ability to set the AP/Client TX rates through RADIUS. From my testing just now all of the radius options regarding rate limiting (Ascend-Data-Rate, Ascend-Xmit-Rate, Mikrotik-Rate-Limit) only create a simple queue to limit the bandwidth and not set the ap/client tx rates. The reason I want to use the ap/client tx rates instead of queues is that queues are very cpu expensive and the ap/client tx rates are not. I explained what I was looking for to David Savage and he suggested I ask you guys directly..
it’s so cool !! When sales this BOARDs?
As we already said - it is already there and it DOES NOT create or use queues, for the exact same reasons you describe. Please contact support to find out more.