v6.24 RC

We are currently fixing last issues with 6.24, for those that had confirmed bug reports, please check if the issue is resolved. Thank you for helping. Some reported issues may not be addressed in this version, but please do write and report details

We have also included a new NTP package that includes all NTP upgrades until this day, if you use the NTP package for the server functionality, please upgrade to this release

We would appreciate all comments regarding the biggest changes - NTP and Queue Tree

We plan to make a full release of v6.24 soon.

Download:
http://www.mikrotik.com/download/share/ … latest.zip
http://www.mikrotik.com/download#rc

What’s new in 6.24rc10 (2014-Dec-22 13:43):

*) ntp - fixed vulnerabilities;
*) web proxy - fix problem when dscp was not set when ipv6 was enabled;
*) fixed problem where some of ethernet cards do not work on x86;
*) improved CCR ethernet driver (less dropped packets);
*) improved queue tree parent=global performance (especially on SMP systems and CCRs);
*) eoip/eoipv6/gre/gre6/ipip/ipipv6/6to4 tunnels have improved per core balancing on CCRs;
*) fixed tx for 6to4 tunnels with unspecified dst address;
*) fixed vrrp - could sometimes not work properly because of advertising bad set of ip addresses;

I updated to 6.24rc10 (build 2014-12-22 13:43:03) using the all-in-one routeros-mipsbe-6.24rc10.npk on an RB2011UiAS-2HnD. Upon doing so and rebooting, the ntp and multicast packages were gone from the router, disabling some important functionality. I had to manually fetch and unpack all_files_6.24rc10.zip, and upload the two missing packages and reboot again, to fix it.

Your software development process needs a complete overhaul — you regularly regress on important patches and fixes, and updating RouterOS is always a roll of the dice as this is not the first time installed packages have vanished (not just becoming disabled, but totally gone) during an upgrade. This is not only the case for RC releases, but full production releases as well.

alexburke, if you mean routeros-mipsbe-6.24.npk package then it does not include the multicast and ntp pacages, they need to be uploaded toghether with bundle npk.

Don’t use combined package. Use your own set extracted from all packages zip file.

So.. sorry if this is the wrong place for a “feature” request. …but isn’t it as easy as compiling the x86 linux kernel with PAE support in order to allow 4GB+ RAM? Or would that break old x86 hardware? I’ve compiled for PAE before and it was simple and apps just worked. Seems like a trivial improvement.

No changes in 6to4 routes since rc4? Doesn’t seem so, still “no route to host” for anything outside 2002::/16.

[Ticket#2014120466000688]

Need changelog confirmation on 6.24 for CCR regarding PPTP fix from 6.23.

On 6.23 when using PPTP, after a while the user connecting to the CCR cannot access the LAN behind the CCR. I have already tried using proxy-arp on the LAN interface to no avail. The only thing that seems to work is using ARP on the LAN interface and rebooting the CCR.

Are the NTP fixes related to the recently discovered vulnerabilities? http://www.ubuntu.com/usn/usn-2449-1/

Could you please tell me what version ROS is using? IS it version 4.2.8

upgrade to 6.24 release successfully. no issue found at all.
Using GRE, EoIP tunnel, OSPF…

Is the AC is developed? Because that’s what it is, it’s a disaster, CCQ up and down, speed up and down :frowning:

Yes, wireless ac updates are verry welcome

The Quick set shows latest version 6.24, but at http://www.mikrotik.com/download is latest 6.23 or 6.23.1, and 6.24rc only.
Is the 6.24 really latest non RC version?

on winbox there aren’t any reference to indicate that’s a RC version

However if you change the link address to get the 6.24 torrent file then you find it isn’t being seeded.

It almost feels like they found a show stopper and forgot to pull it from the auto update system.

Regards
Alexander

the new CCR ethernet driver seems working fine because we don’t have more drops on VLAN using only-hardware-queue

We had a crash on our PPPOE-Concentrator when huge number of pppoe clients connect/disconnect, sent supout: Tcket#2014122466000113]

We still don’t see a good balance of the cores using VPLS / Bridge / PPPOE server:
[Ticket#2014122366000393]

hope to receive soon some answer about these tickets.

regards
Ros

We not had crash, but have extremally CPU usage in massive pppoe disconnection.

And, also, we have no reply from support (Ticket#2014122166000217). Only letter from robot. Third day. :-/

wireless-fp package still has a lot of packet loss in 6.23 hope it is fixed

IPv6 is new version of internet protocol.

I have very strange VRRP result in this release ( 6.24 build-time: Dec/23/2014 13:38:45).

I upgraded for test two routers from ROS6.20 (RB450G and RB800) and result is:
VRRPv2 without authorization - both routers become master,
VRRPv2 with AH authorization - this works OK but slave router reports: received packet from 10.51.110.12 AH authentication failed
VRRPv3/IPv4 - both routers becomes master
VRRPv3/IPv6 with no global IPv6 assigned on the vrrp interface - works OK but this is useless configuration sometimes
VRRPv3/IPv6 with two global IPv6 addressess on the vrrp interface - both router report: “received packet from fe80::ff:fe00:X misconfigured IP addresses” and after few router switching both routers became master.

6.20 is the latest stable for me.
from 6.20 upwards I get very heavy lag connecting to a RB…

about 10 secs to login via winbox.
with 6.20 everything is OK

I have been able to reproduce the problem. The problem of “lag” appears on the RB that is doing NAT MASQUERADE.

For example in my case the RB in my office is a 951, if >6.20 the problem appears.

On the RB that does routing I have no issues.