Community discussions

MikroTik App
 
User avatar
hassibi
Trainer
Trainer
Topic Author
Posts: 130
Joined: Wed Jun 13, 2012 5:58 am
Location: Iran,Kerman

VPLS Bug in X86 Architecture

Mon Aug 06, 2012 9:24 pm

Hello
i am using routeros 6 for x86 architecture and i run vpls tunnel between two routers and my x86 routers reboot when they statring up.

thanks.
 
Inssomniak
Member
Member
Posts: 332
Joined: Fri Apr 13, 2007 11:21 pm

Re: VPLS Bug in X86 Architecture

Fri Aug 17, 2012 2:23 am

Hello
i am using routeros 6 for x86 architecture and i run vpls tunnel between two routers and my x86 routers reboot when they statring up.

thanks.
Yea I can confirm this too, only in a testing environment though.

Im gonna gather you are also using intel pro/1000 NIC card? If so what is the exact chipset?
 
wpeople
Member
Member
Posts: 380
Joined: Sat May 26, 2007 6:36 pm

Re: VPLS Bug in X86 Architecture

Sat Jan 25, 2014 8:46 pm

Hi,
i have the same issue, with 5.18 and 5.26 using HP NC360T (intel 82571 chipset)
did you found any solution?
 
wpeople
Member
Member
Posts: 380
Joined: Sat May 26, 2007 6:36 pm

Re: VPLS Bug in X86 Architecture

Mon Aug 04, 2014 2:02 pm

any news on this?
 
User avatar
tomaskir
Trainer
Trainer
Posts: 1162
Joined: Sat Sep 24, 2011 2:32 pm
Location: Slovakia

Re: VPLS Bug in X86 Architecture

Mon Aug 04, 2014 4:01 pm

This issue has been around for a long time, I have submitted support tickets, but never got a reply...

[Ticket#2014032866000651]
 
User avatar
Kreacher
Member
Member
Posts: 359
Joined: Wed Sep 25, 2013 3:58 pm
Location: Hogwarts

Re: VPLS Bug in X86 Architecture

Mon Sep 29, 2014 2:59 am

Hello
i am using routeros 6 for x86 architecture and i run vpls tunnel between two routers and my x86 routers reboot when they statring up.

thanks.
As I see it right the entire x_86 line of RouterOS is not really urgent enough at the moment
for MikroTik because of the CCR, CRS and other new devices and on top working on v7.x.

So it is very said but I think this will be a long time until someone from MikroTik will
work any time on this problem.

Also a x86_64 veriosn, cpu multi core usage and HT usage of all cpu cores, more then 2 GB would
be fine to have or plain build very strong routers.

And so it will be playing more and more in the hand of the other vendors for building such a stronger router with OpenBGPD, Vyatta, Quagga or plain OpenBSD.

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], CryptoCurrencyDyday, K0NCTANT1N, triss and 77 guests