Community discussions

MikroTik App
 
davidsm
just joined
Topic Author
Posts: 11
Joined: Wed Nov 05, 2008 1:48 am

Too many OSPF interfaces

Mon Mar 21, 2011 9:31 am

I have an RB1100 running v4.10 acting as a PPPoE server for several apartment blocks. A few days a go a problem crept in where my nightly backup (an export) didn't complete and the router stayed at 100% CPU. I tracked the issue down to the following:

There is a /24 for the PPPoE users. I'm using OSPF, the PPP addresses are all in their own area and route summarisation works a treat. I now have 144 OSPF interfaces, 134 are PPP interfaces. When I view them in the winbox GUI everthing seems fine. When I jump onto the console and run "/routing ospf interface pr" I get from 0 to 136 listed and then the list starts again at 4 and repeats indefinitely. If I run an export in for this, it just hangs after the first 4 lines are displayed and the router stays at 100%.

I tried kicking 10 users and running the print command again, all fine, 126 lines reported, no looping. Is there a max number of OSPF interfaces the system can handle? Is there something I can do so that OSPF doesn't 'see' these as interfaces but I can still have their /24 advertised out?

I have an even larger site (over 300 users) that I'm looking to port to a PPPoE setup (for accounting) that will be using OSPF as well.

Cheers,

Dave..
 
mps01k
Frequent Visitor
Frequent Visitor
Posts: 89
Joined: Fri Mar 23, 2007 9:09 pm
Location: HONDURAS
Contact:

Re: Too many OSPF interfaces

Mon Mar 21, 2011 11:20 am

on your ospf network. do you have 0.0.0.0/0 or do you have the specific subnet listed? it sounds to me like you have 0.0.0.0/0 and so it tries to run a ospf session on every single interface including your pppoe.

cheers
 
davidsm
just joined
Topic Author
Posts: 11
Joined: Wed Nov 05, 2008 1:48 am

Re: Too many OSPF interfaces

Mon Mar 21, 2011 2:00 pm

As for the OSPF network tab, I've only got the /24 for the PPP users, the router's loopback address and a few /28 used for backhaul.

So, yes, it's defining every PPPoE interface as an OSPF one, but of type point-to-point (or passive if I include the definition for all-interfaces passive).

The problem seems to arise from the number of them when listed on the command line. OSPF itself doesn't seem to have any problems.

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 27 guests