http://forum.mikrotik.com/viewtopic.php ... ter+static
http://forum.mikrotik.com/viewtopic.php ... ter+static
Currently playing around with 2 metarouter instances on an RB1000 and 2 metarouter instances on an RB1100 (both running v4.9).
I have the interfaces setup as static interfaces, bound to ethernet interfaces on the RB1000 and RB1100 like so:
Code: Select all
/metarouter interface
add comment="" disabled=no static-interface=ether1 type=static virtual-machine=vm1 vm-mac-address=02:4C:44:51:2A:86
add comment="" disabled=no static-interface=ether2 type=static virtual-machine=vm2 vm-mac-address=02:FD:20:37:29:05
add comment="" disabled=no static-interface=ether3 type=static virtual-machine=vm1 vm-mac-address=02:9A:C7:DE:17:6F
add comment="" disabled=no static-interface=ether4 type=static virtual-machine=vm2 vm-mac-address=02:0F:03:19:4D:EF
RB1000:
Code: Select all
/ip address add address=192.168.1.1/24 interface=ether1
Code: Select all
/ip address add address=192.168.1.2/24 interface=ether1 comment="fiirst MetaRouter interface is also ether1 on RB1000"
However, 192.168.1.1 and 192.168.1.2 can't see each other, nor get a response.
I don't see any arp lease appear for either of the 2 when trying to get a response either, they don't even see each other in the mikrotik neighbours list.
Is this a bug, or am I mis-interpreting how the static metarouter interfaces should be used?