v6.7 released

dbodeenisudm · Fri Jan 03, 2014 12:17 am

Thanks Mikrotik upgraded 2 2011 at 5.25 to 6.7 and 1 completely died and 1 had to be powercycled twice to get it back and I am assuming that will die but am scared to downgrade to 6.6 because it will probably die. I only upgraded because 2011s are so buggy on 5.25 and anything else 5. Should have just upgraded to 6.6 in retrospect. Really getting sick of Mikrotik its just so cheap and Router OS is so awesome its hard to get away. After the 450g disaster of all those capacitors blowing I really question who is running the show over there in Latvia. Talk about trying to ruin a good thing with terrible hardware decisions and quality control.

jackwing · Fri Jan 03, 2014 4:25 am

I want to say that , maybe the problems what I had , was ROS not support intel i350 network adapter as well .

Just like in the photo, several interfaces with the same MAC address.

I had tried v6.x and v5.x , same problems.

I had tried reset configuration , no any config , but not help.

bysard · Fri Jan 03, 2014 8:45 am

Thanks Mikrotik upgraded 2 2011 at 5.25 to 6.7 and 1 completely died and 1 had to be powercycled twice to get it back and I am assuming that will die but am scared to downgrade to 6.6 because it will probably die. I only upgraded because 2011s are so buggy on 5.25 and anything else 5. Should have just upgraded to 6.6 in retrospect. Really getting sick of Mikrotik its just so cheap and Router OS is so awesome its hard to get away. After the 450g disaster of all those capacitors blowing I really question who is running the show over there in Latvia. Talk about trying to ruin a good thing with terrible hardware decisions and quality control.

I must also sign under this.

Fri Jan 03, 2014 2:26 pm

I want to say that , maybe the problems what I had , was ROS not support intel i350 network adapter as well .

Just like in the photo, several interfaces with the same MAC address.

I had tried v6.x and v5.x , same problems.

I had tried reset configuration , no any config , but not help.

Please install RouterOS v6.7 make a support output file and send it to support@mikrotik.com
What exact Intel I350 adapter are using using - is it a PCIe card or built-in module on the board?

Jetrider · Fri Jan 03, 2014 4:58 pm

Talk about trying to ruin a good thing with terrible hardware decisions and quality control.

Sadly I cannot disagree with this.

jackwing · Fri Jan 03, 2014 9:19 pm

I want to say that , maybe the problems what I had , was ROS not support intel i350 network adapter as well .

Just like in the photo, several interfaces with the same MAC address.

I had tried v6.x and v5.x , same problems.

I had tried reset configuration , no any config , but not help.
Please install RouterOS v6.7 make a support output file and send it to support@mikrotik.com
What exact Intel I350 adapter are using using - is it a PCIe card or built-in module on the board?

PCIE card , support output file had already send

lashguti · Sat Jan 04, 2014 10:51 am

We had packet loss on ports in CCR1036 with 6.5 and 6.7 as well as prerouting rules were stopping traffic passing through them,
it was enough to disable and enable them to continue working for 10-15 minutes and stop again,

we downgraded back to 6.2, everything fine

infused · Mon Jan 06, 2014 12:20 am

6.3 works fine on CCR. Haven't had any issues and I've been running it for quite a few months now.

Mon Jan 06, 2014 5:55 pm

I want to say that , maybe the problems what I had , was ROS not support intel i350 network adapter as well .

Just like in the photo, several interfaces with the same MAC address.

I had tried v6.x and v5.x , same problems.

I had tried reset configuration , no any config , but not help.
Please install RouterOS v6.7 make a support output file and send it to support@mikrotik.com
What exact Intel I350 adapter are using using - is it a PCIe card or built-in module on the board?

PCIE card , support output file had already send

Resetting the MAC address to the original MAC address will help with your issue.

Mon Jan 06, 2014 11:27 pm

Resetting the MAC address to the original MAC address will help with your issue.

This can be done with:

/interface ethernet reset-mac-address ether1

Where ether1 is the interface name.

littlebill · Tue Jan 07, 2014 1:15 am

10mbit leds are not working on 2011

i get no led activity on 10mbit devices on the fast ethernet side. gig side it works fine?

any update? ticket has been sitting there for weeks now, along with ups issues

jackwing · Tue Jan 07, 2014 4:37 am

i will test again

jackwing · Tue Jan 07, 2014 4:38 am

i will test again

OlegM · Tue Jan 07, 2014 2:03 pm

From version to version is not happening, no changes in the protocol PPP. After 2-3 weeks of continuous operation in the PPP interfaces winbox open very long. Memory grows continuously until you reboot CCR.

Tue Jan 07, 2014 2:11 pm

From version to version is not happening, no changes in the protocol PPP. After 2-3 weeks of continuous operation in the PPP interfaces winbox open very long. Memory grows continuously until you reboot CCR.

v6.7 hasn't been around that long, to make such graphs. I would guess you run an older version then?

OlegM · Tue Jan 07, 2014 2:18 pm

From version to version is not happening, no changes in the protocol PPP. After 2-3 weeks of continuous operation in the PPP interfaces winbox open very long. Memory grows continuously until you reboot CCR.
v6.7 hasn't been around that long, to make such graphs. I would guess you run an older version then?

With the new 6.7 version. Accordingly dates for December.

dimasz · Tue Jan 07, 2014 5:26 pm

I have the same problem as OlegM, but much faster

jackwing · Thu Jan 09, 2014 6:49 am

Resetting the MAC address to the original MAC address will help with your issue.

OK , Resetting was effect

Ether port work fine ,vlan work fine.
If no vlan, dhcp server work fine , with the vlan on Ether port and trunk port on switch , vlan can work but dhcp server can't work.

I still used V5.26 , but I need to use set mac address command to fix the mac address's problem.

log and support had send to support@mikrotik.com

Chupaka · Thu Jan 09, 2014 4:56 pm

have anybody noticed the issue with not working address list items on CCR?

we installed CCR-1036 a few days ago, and today I saw two users without Internet access. after disabling/enabling their (static) address list entries, they started working again. I'm surprised because similar problem was fixed more than five years ago in v3.16 (Ticket#2008081866000458), and we don't have this behaviour on our x86 routers

Fri Jan 10, 2014 8:29 am

have anybody noticed the issue with not working address list items on CCR?

we installed CCR-1036 a few days ago, and today I saw two users without Internet access. after disabling/enabling their (static) address list entries, they started working again. I'm surprised because similar problem was fixed more than five years ago in v3.16 (Ticket#2008081866000458), and we don't have this behaviour on our x86 routers

As you can see in the v6.8rc1 changelog, there is a bugfix for address list issue. Try the pre-release.

Chupaka · Fri Jan 10, 2014 9:47 am

As you can see in the v6.8rc1 changelog, there is a bugfix for address list issue. Try the pre-release.

hope so, Normis, but I don't create duplicate address list entries =)

wichets · Fri Jan 10, 2014 10:35 am

ros code

i just report for inform that i cloud use the lte devices with routeros 6.7 but cannot check the "LTE info."
after i completed upgrade from 6.6 to 6.7 i got the error "registering failed lte1" and ""registering failed lte1" pleae see attached picture
as the previuse version the 6.6 with out this error message.

doush · Sat Jan 11, 2014 12:57 pm

have anybody noticed the issue with not working address list items on CCR?

we installed CCR-1036 a few days ago, and today I saw two users without Internet access. after disabling/enabling their (static) address list entries, they started working again. I'm surprised because similar problem was fixed more than five years ago in v3.16 (Ticket#2008081866000458), and we don't have this behaviour on our x86 routers

I have seen this and was checking if my actual firewall rule was wrong. Thanks for bringing it up.

Tbird · Sat Jan 11, 2014 2:41 pm

I have the same problem as OlegM, but much faster

Any of you guys with memory leakage use Radius Manager by any chance? We had the same issue - removed Radius Manager and the API for CPE signal polling, and the memory problem was solved...

/TB

OlegM · Sat Jan 11, 2014 6:36 pm

I have the same problem as OlegM, but much faster
Any of you guys with memory leakage use Radius Manager by any chance? We had the same issue - removed Radius Manager and the API for CPE signal polling, and the memory problem was solved...

/TB

Why, then, need a router if it can not use radius and api. This basic service for authentication and control of users on the Internet. So it is necessary to solve this problem and not exclude it.

Tbird · Sun Jan 12, 2014 12:22 am

I have the same problem as OlegM, but much faster
Any of you guys with memory leakage use Radius Manager by any chance? We had the same issue - removed Radius Manager and the API for CPE signal polling, and the memory problem was solved...

/TB
Why, then, need a router if it can not use radius and api. This basic service for authentication and control of users on the Internet. So it is necessary to solve this problem and not exclude it.

You don't really answer the question, but we suspect the API to be the sinner. If the API have session issues - like opening a new session every time, without closing the previous - I assume that could explain the leakage. We could never run for more than 25-30 days on our RB1100, before it ran out of memory and needed reboot. We looked everywhere and tried all possible settings and versions without any improvements. Finally we switched to another Radius without API for signal polling (using SNMP instead) - and problem was gone. Simple test for you to run; just turn off API for a few days...

/TB

Sun Jan 12, 2014 1:12 am

If the API have session issues - like opening a new session every time, without closing the previous - I assume that could explain the leakage.

FYI - You can explicitly close an API connection by issuing a "/quit" command every time you're done with it, thus not causing leakage.

OlegM · Sun Jan 12, 2014 12:24 pm

If the API have session issues - like opening a new session every time, without closing the previous - I assume that could explain the leakage.
FYI - You can explicitly close an API connection by issuing a "/quit" command every time you're done with it, thus not causing leakage.

It turns out it is a hole,in which the missing session are not disabled themselves.

Sun Jan 12, 2014 5:17 pm

If the API have session issues - like opening a new session every time, without closing the previous - I assume that could explain the leakage.
FYI - You can explicitly close an API connection by issuing a "/quit" command every time you're done with it, thus not causing leakage.
It turns out it is a hole,in which the missing session are not disabled themselves.

But if you "/quit" it, it's no longer leaking, right?

(Or do you mean that even quitted connections leak memory?)

OlegM · Sun Jan 12, 2014 9:58 pm

But if you "/quit" it, it's no longer leaking, right?

(Or do you mean that even quitted connections leak memory?)

Turns out, that remains in the memory. For the memory is constantly growing.

macsrwe · Mon Jan 13, 2014 12:53 am

Upgraded today on RB750UP, previous firmware was 5.24, suddenly I have port flapping, but only if I try to connect with winbox, if I use ssh everything is ok. I have some devices powered on ports, try to change poe status to forced-on and auto but nothing change. I upgraded also rb firmware, but still the same issue. I am connecting to in with winbox on linux (wine).
Any other suggestion?

POE-out port flapping occurs in 6.7 (maybe others) when any interface examination is being done. This includes the "Interfaces" window being open in Winbox. If you close this window (and any other window that would "examine" ethernet ports) flapping will disappear. If you use ssh, and run POE monitoring, you will see the same flapping. This is fixed in the (unreleased) 6.8.

zman · Mon Jan 13, 2014 8:53 pm

Hello.
I installed 6.7 version to RB951Ui-2HnD and have some problems.
I added rules with the identical names and different addresses in firewall->address list.
After that I tried to remove or disabled 4-5 rules, but at this time winbox was disconnected or the router rebooted.

dadaniel · Tue Jan 14, 2014 11:50 am

Will Ticket#2013112866000182 be fixed in v6.8?

Zito · Tue Jan 14, 2014 3:25 pm

At what stage is work on a solution for flapping fast ethernet ports on rb2011? When do we expect fix?
[Ticket#2013120466000341]

spire2z · Mon Jan 20, 2014 1:52 pm

Running full BGP on CCR. Seems to work well, nice and fast.

Only thing I have noticed is that CPU 9 often sits at 100% It doesn't seem to cause any problem or performance issues though.

Ham · Wed Jan 22, 2014 4:18 am

10mbit leds are not working on 2011

i get no led activity on 10mbit devices on the fast ethernet side. gig side it works fine?

any update? ticket has been sitting there for weeks now, along with ups issues

Also having issues with the fast ethernet bank on 2011's with 6.7, no ethernet activity with some devices it will not negoiate a state. Have not had to much time to look into it as we are to busy to worry about it now.

It's a narly bug thou!

armandfumal · Wed Jan 22, 2014 11:48 pm

What's new in 6.8rc1 (2014-Jan-21 11:25):

*) wireless - improved 11n and nv2 stability;
*) dhcp client - support interfaces in bridge;
*) dhcp - parse decimal strings and IP addreses in options value;
*) bgp - don't show community 'internet' in BGP advertisements;
*) ipsec - enable hardware acceleration for aes-cbc + md5|sha1|sha256 aead on tilera cpus;
*) ospf - fixed checksum calculation for OSPFv3 AS-external-LSAs;
*) default configuration - changed dhcp server lease time to 10 minutes;
*) fixed port isolation on CRSs (bug introduced in v6.6);
*) smb - added support for SMB 2.002
*) timezone information updated;
*) ppp - fixed ppp bridging (did not work since v6.6);
*) improved speed of PPP, PPPoE, PPTP & L2TP on multicore routers;
*) address-list - fix crash when adding two identical address list entries (not allowed any more);
*) fixed multicast forwarding on CCRs;
*) firewall - improved address-type matcher, and added it for ipv6 aswell;

haver · Thu Jan 23, 2014 10:04 am

upgraded my x86 to 6.7 from 5.26.
Once 1-2 days bridge interface is removing itself!!! And all addresses which were on bridge interface are UNKNOWN! PPP users also cant connect becouse they were in bridge interface!
Reboot helps, but i cant do it always.
Which firmware (I mean 6.x version) should i downgrade to avoid this kind of problem?

Burgerkhmer · Thu Jan 23, 2014 10:39 am

Could you please show me how to upgrade, it says could not resolve address upgrade.mikrotik.com

Thu Jan 23, 2014 1:14 pm

Could you please show me how to upgrade, it says could not resolve address upgrade.mikrotik.com

make sure that you have dns server specified in the router and you have access to the internet from the router.

kev445 · Thu Jan 23, 2014 2:55 pm

All routes with routing mark is down after upgrade from 6.6 to 6.7, remove the routing mark will make route establish

We're having the exact same issue, appears it may have been happening for several versions (upgraded from 5.X to 6.7), as we downgraded to 6.6 and the issue is still present (don't want to keep downgrading).

Just to clarify, we are adding the routing mark through mangle for ALL traffic from a certain IP excluding several destination IP ranges (we can't do that through the routing interace, as someone else suggested). I've tried simplifying the rule without success.

Marsupilani · Thu Jan 23, 2014 3:50 pm

Is it possible if i upgrade from ROS V5.26 to ROS v6.7 directly ?
yes!

Could you tell me how? I'm new with RouterOS, but when I clicked packages->Check for Upgrade or AutoUpgrade the System told me the newest Version is 5.26 !?? I'm using a new RB-951G-2HND I was able to upgrade from 5.24 to 5.26 but not higher, my License told me Upgradeable to v7.x???

saaremaa · Thu Jan 23, 2014 7:01 pm

PPPoE users are authorized to RB1100AHx2 through Radius request to billing. Found that RB1100AHx2 not send requests (Accounting-Update) on billing. Billing believes that the user disconnected and hang PPPoE session. In the settings billing parameter "Timeout hung session (s) = 60 sec". If RB1100AHx2 not send (Accounting-Update) on Billing - Billing disconnect PPPoE session number. The problem occurs only on 6.8rc1 (2014-Jan-21 11:25).Version 5.25 (5.26) works perfectly and user not hanging.
Can anyone confirm this error?

armandfumal · Thu Jan 23, 2014 7:40 pm

PPPoE users are authorized to RB1100AHx2 through Radius request to billing. Found that RB1100AHx2 not send requests (Accounting-Update) on billing. Billing believes that the user disconnected and hang PPPoE session. In the settings billing parameter "Timeout hung session (s) = 60 sec". If RB1100AHx2 not send (Accounting-Update) on Billing - Billing disconnect PPPoE session number. The problem occurs only on 6.8rc1 (2014-Jan-21 11:25).Version 5.25 (5.26) works perfectly and user not hanging.
Can anyone confirm this error?

be sure that radius is not sending radius attribute with session timemout, to be sure, create a local user and test with this user...or debug radius exchange...

Thu Jan 23, 2014 7:42 pm

when comes 6.8?

armandfumal · Thu Jan 23, 2014 7:47 pm

when comes 6.8?

when it is done

I'm running the 6.8RC1 in prod, no issue found in my case, using : BGP, OSPF, IPV6, SNMP...

Thu Jan 23, 2014 8:45 pm

I had troubles with rb 750UP with the POE that flapping with routeros 6.7
Now have a upgraded to 6.8rc and flapping is stopped.

Łukasz · Fri Jan 24, 2014 3:23 pm

Is it possible if i upgrade from ROS V5.26 to ROS v6.7 directly ?
yes!
Could you tell me how? I'm new with RouterOS, but when I clicked packages->Check for Upgrade or AutoUpgrade the System told me the newest Version is 5.26 !?? I'm using a new RB-951G-2HND I was able to upgrade from 5.24 to 5.26 but not higher, my License told me Upgradeable to v7.x???

Download http://download2.mikrotik.com/routeros/ ... be-6.7.npk file.
Chose menu "files" and upgrade this file or drag and drop file if you use winbox.
Reboot the router using menu (Sytem->Reboot).
Thats all.

jondavy · Sat Jan 25, 2014 4:17 pm

Possible Bug
I have a bridge interface that contains several ethernet in, just yesterday I changed this bridge STP, RSTP was to NONE, then the LCD touch also froze and stopped the traffic and navigation stopped, the only solution was found in time to restart soon it started functioning normally, I do not have as many tests it in production
I'm using a RB-CCR1016-12G ROS 6.7

Trisc · Mon Jan 27, 2014 4:18 pm

I cannot enter a list of frequencies into wireless scan-list after upgrading to 6.7. Winbox interface gives an error.

Entering a scan-list in command line produces multiple drop down items in winbox - very strange behaviour.

m3gaman · Mon Jan 27, 2014 11:25 pm

Routeros 6.8rc1 isn't accounting the amount of traffic, on radius always have 0kB in database.

saaremaa · Tue Jan 28, 2014 6:47 am

Routeros 6.8rc1 isn't accounting the amount of traffic, on radius always have 0kB in database.

The same problem.
[Ticket#2014012466000189] RE: PPPoE-user reconnect

Alfabi · Tue Jan 28, 2014 12:50 pm

im have strange bug from 6.5-6.8rc1
on 6.4 all is well

double traffic per minute. using ospf+mpls, no difference track system
on or off mtu is 1518 or 1508, double traffic is only on transport
port....

noobitol · Tue Jan 28, 2014 6:25 pm

hey everyone...
i have some question

can API PHP conect to mysql database??? i have project managemen user use PHP

system managemen user===>mysql database<===Mikrotik

can mikrotik read mysql database...???

im not talking about radius #sorry bad english

Lakis · Wed Jan 29, 2014 7:00 pm

Alfabi u have random traffic "spaiks"

ringlet · Wed Jan 29, 2014 9:36 pm

http://download2.mikrotik.com/routeros/ ... be-6.8.npk

http://www.mikrotik.com/download/CHANGELOG_6

What's new in 6.8 (2014-Jan-29 15:52):

*) bridge - default protocol-mode changed to RSTP for new bridges,
fixed bridge mac address changing when port (with lowest mac address) goes down
*) userman - improve startup time;
*) sstp client - support server name verification from certificate;
*) wireless - improved 11n and nv2 stability;
*) dhcp client - support interfaces in bridge;
*) dhcp - parse decimal strings and IP addreses in options value;
*) bgp - don't show community 'internet' in BGP advertisements;
*) ipsec - enable hardware acceleration for aes-cbc + md5|sha1|sha256 aead on tilera cpus;
*) ospf - fixed checksum calculation for OSPFv3 AS-external-LSAs;
*) default configuration - changed dhcp server lease time to 10 minutes;
*) fixed port isolation on CRSs (bug introduced in v6.6);
*) smb - added support for SMB 2.002
*) timezone information updated;
*) ppp - fixed ppp bridging (did not work since v6.6);
*) improved speed of PPP, PPPoE, PPTP & L2TP on multicore routers;
*) address-list - fix crash when adding two identical address list entries (not allowed any more);
*) fixed multicast forwarding on CCRs;
*) firewall - improved address-type matcher, and added it for ipv6 aswell;

why there is no link to file in official page?

m3gaman · Wed Jan 29, 2014 11:29 pm

Have someone tested radius accounting with that version(6.8 jan29)?

saaremaa · Thu Jan 30, 2014 7:22 am

Have someone tested radius accounting with that version(6.8 jan29)?

the same question
+1

unm · Thu Jan 30, 2014 9:09 am

Yes, very intersting(Radius Accounting(Interim-Update) in PPPoE). Bug is solved or not?

infused · Thu Jan 30, 2014 12:41 pm

Nothing for CRS?

Thu Jan 30, 2014 1:08 pm

Yes, very intersting(Radius Accounting(Interim-Update) in PPPoE). Bug is solved or not?

Solved in 6.9

madcat · Thu Jan 30, 2014 6:27 pm

What is the correct place to submit bugs?

i have an issue with the addresslist feature which is updated this release.
When i change or add an adresslist under firewall, the router will hang and does not accept any connections until it's reset again

iDen · Thu Jan 30, 2014 10:16 pm

fixed port isolation on CRSs

What is port isolation on MT?
How is it implemented on MT?

Nothing found on forums/wiki.
Any info links please.

estdata · Thu Jan 30, 2014 10:25 pm

I have a proposal, whether the developer would not be able to develop the separate on Denial of Service?
Would be interested in perhaps the most people. When the new guidance to be issued?

armandfumal · Fri Jan 31, 2014 7:58 am

BUG report
Version: 6.9 30/01/2014 13:02:02
plateforme: RB1100AHX2

DateTime in log is not logged with current system time. It seems recording in GMT
Instead GMT+1 in my case...

Fri Jan 31, 2014 10:40 am

BUG report
Version: 6.9 30/01/2014 13:02:02
plateforme: RB1100AHX2

DateTime in log is not logged with current system time. It seems recording in GMT
Instead GMT+1 in my case...

do you have DST maybe ?

i4jordan · Fri Jan 31, 2014 11:58 am

Is the 6.9 version publicly available?
I can not find it and also if I use update package it only finds 6.7 which is current version.

I have a CCS running with a lot of ipsec tunnels and are very interested in hardware accelerated aes ipsec.

Thank you.

Fri Jan 31, 2014 11:59 am

We have not released any new version since v6.7 !

i4jordan · Fri Jan 31, 2014 12:24 pm

Normis,

Why is everybody talking about 6.9 on this forum.
And not 6.9 beta of 6.9rcx.

Fri Jan 31, 2014 12:25 pm

Normis,

Why is everybody talking about 6.9 on this forum.
And not 6.9 beta of 6.9rcx.

I don't know

we did publish a pre-release privately for some testers.

doush · Fri Jan 31, 2014 1:43 pm

We have not released any new version since v6.7 !

Let me fix this for you:

"We have released v6.8 since v6.7 but pulled it back from the website after a few hours due to RouterBOOT problems"

Fri Jan 31, 2014 1:47 pm

We have not released any new version since v6.7 !
Let me fix this for you:

"We have released v6.8 since v6.7 but pulled it back from the website after a few hours due to RouterBOOT problems"

Not hours, we did not put it on the website at all. Only torrent was released for some 5-10 minutes, then files were deleted.
Believe me, we can see how many people downloaded it. Looks like all of them have posted on this forum (not many)

poizzon · Fri Jan 31, 2014 1:54 pm

QueueTree are empty, when vieweg via WinBox
but via Terminal everythink are ok

after reboot'ing everything is shwo'ing...

armandfumal · Fri Jan 31, 2014 4:21 pm

BUG report
Version: 6.9 30/01/2014 13:02:02
plateforme: RB1100AHX2

DateTime in log is not logged with current system time. It seems recording in GMT
Instead GMT+1 in my case...
do you have DST maybe ?

Normis,

the system clock is ok. but when line appear in the log, the time is not the same as current system time...
It was never the case before

system/clock timezone is on Europe/Brussels

Begetan · Mon Feb 17, 2014 4:38 pm

im have strange bug from 6.5-6.8rc1
on 6.4 all is well

double traffic per minute. using ospf+mpls, no difference track system
on or off mtu is 1518 or 1508, double traffic is only on transport
port....

I have the same issue on RB2011 with version 6.7

Simple routing with OSPF.

honzam · Mon Feb 17, 2014 5:47 pm

upgrade to ROS 6.10

ros code

Who is online