RouterOS v6.27 released

Fri Feb 20, 2015 10:08 pm

Its been rebooted now so it doesn't show 100%. When it is at 100% I can't pull up anything but profiler shows management as the process.

Don't you have istalled dude package, do you?

infernoltu · Fri Feb 20, 2015 11:53 pm

Hello.

I read all posts here, but did not found that someone face same issue too.
I have a wide range of CCR1016 routers and routerOS based virtual routers.
The issue what i faced now is:
my cload core CCR1016-12G was able to be upgraded to newest 6.27 version with out any problems.
The upgrade was done from v6.24 to v6.27 on CCR1016
But now on virtual machines the upgrade fail.
My virtual routerOS are running v6.24 and v6.21.1.
When i go to system>packages>check for updates>download and upgrade, it tries to get latest v6.27 version, but during download it says it failed to download
isdn package.
Well this package i do not need, so i uninstalled it from mine virtual routers.
Then i repeat upgraded, download is successfull, it reboots for upgrade to be installed.
In console it writes it does the update.
No errors are given out by command line GUI.
But once router loads, and i log in to it, i see my old version v6.21.1 or v6.24
So it does not upgrade, and does not give any error.

jwcn · Sat Feb 21, 2015 3:25 am

Its been rebooted now so it doesn't show 100%. When it is at 100% I can't pull up anything but profiler shows management as the process.
Don't you have istalled dude package, do you?

No.

yvhitxcel · Sat Feb 21, 2015 10:23 am

ccr1036 12G-4s v6.27 hotspot not working.i didn't look the login web. my email 2338953@qq.com

rextended · Sat Feb 21, 2015 12:03 pm

Hello.

I read all posts here, but did not found that someone face same issue too.
I have a wide range of CCR1016 routers and routerOS based virtual routers.
The issue what i faced now is:
my cload core CCR1016-12G was able to be upgraded to newest 6.27 version with out any problems.
The upgrade was done from v6.24 to v6.27 on CCR1016
But now on virtual machines the upgrade fail.
My virtual routerOS are running v6.24 and v6.21.1.
When i go to system>packages>check for updates>download and upgrade, it tries to get latest v6.27 version, but during download it says it failed to download
isdn package.
Well this package i do not need, so i uninstalled it from mine virtual routers.
Then i repeat upgraded, download is successfull, it reboots for upgrade to be installed.
In console it writes it does the update.
No errors are given out by command line GUI.
But once router loads, and i log in to it, i see my old version v6.21.1 or v6.24
So it does not upgrade, and does not give any error.

How much time you use same SoftwareID?
You use Software ID downloaded from Internet?

rextended · Sat Feb 21, 2015 12:07 pm

ccr1036 12G-4s v6.27 hotspot not working.i didn't look the login web. my email 2338953@qq.com

Do not simply leave email, this is not one direct support service, open new thread and post your config.
If someone want help you, you get help.
All users must benefit from helping you.

infernoltu · Sat Feb 21, 2015 2:08 pm

Physical cloadcores run each of them with lic preinstalled.
Virtual mikrotiks, they are clones of each other.
I am using them already for couple years, and did not experienced any problems till now.
So this means if i try to get software upgrade with same ID, it will fail?

Hello.

I read all posts here, but did not found that someone face same issue too.
I have a wide range of CCR1016 routers and routerOS based virtual routers.
The issue what i faced now is:
my cload core CCR1016-12G was able to be upgraded to newest 6.27 version with out any problems.
The upgrade was done from v6.24 to v6.27 on CCR1016
But now on virtual machines the upgrade fail.
My virtual routerOS are running v6.24 and v6.21.1.
When i go to system>packages>check for updates>download and upgrade, it tries to get latest v6.27 version, but during download it says it failed to download
isdn package.
Well this package i do not need, so i uninstalled it from mine virtual routers.
Then i repeat upgraded, download is successfull, it reboots for upgrade to be installed.
In console it writes it does the update.
No errors are given out by command line GUI.
But once router loads, and i log in to it, i see my old version v6.21.1 or v6.24
So it does not upgrade, and does not give any error.
How much time you use same SoftwareID?
You use Software ID downloaded from Internet?

Sat Feb 21, 2015 3:03 pm

Physical cloadcores run each of them with lic preinstalled.
Virtual mikrotiks, they are clones of each other.
I am using them already for couple years, and did not experienced any problems till now.
So this means if i try to get software upgrade with same ID, it will fail?

Hello.

I read all posts here, but did not found that someone face same issue too.
I have a wide range of CCR1016 routers and routerOS based virtual routers.
The issue what i faced now is:
my cload core CCR1016-12G was able to be upgraded to newest 6.27 version with out any problems.
The upgrade was done from v6.24 to v6.27 on CCR1016
But now on virtual machines the upgrade fail.
My virtual routerOS are running v6.24 and v6.21.1.
When i go to system>packages>check for updates>download and upgrade, it tries to get latest v6.27 version, but during download it says it failed to download
isdn package.
Well this package i do not need, so i uninstalled it from mine virtual routers.
Then i repeat upgraded, download is successfull, it reboots for upgrade to be installed.
In console it writes it does the update.
No errors are given out by command line GUI.
But once router loads, and i log in to it, i see my old version v6.21.1 or v6.24
So it does not upgrade, and does not give any error.
How much time you use same SoftwareID?
You use Software ID downloaded from Internet?

Did you pay for license for each individual copy?

infernoltu · Sat Feb 21, 2015 4:39 pm

Problem solved.
Its not licensing or smth like that.
Its smth wrong with system>packages updater.
I upgraded manually from 6.21.1 to 6.26 and to 6.27 successfully.

Hello.

I read all posts here, but did not found that someone face same issue too.
I have a wide range of CCR1016 routers and routerOS based virtual routers.
The issue what i faced now is:
my cload core CCR1016-12G was able to be upgraded to newest 6.27 version with out any problems.
The upgrade was done from v6.24 to v6.27 on CCR1016
But now on virtual machines the upgrade fail.
My virtual routerOS are running v6.24 and v6.21.1.
When i go to system>packages>check for updates>download and upgrade, it tries to get latest v6.27 version, but during download it says it failed to download
isdn package.
Well this package i do not need, so i uninstalled it from mine virtual routers.
Then i repeat upgraded, download is successfull, it reboots for upgrade to be installed.
In console it writes it does the update.
No errors are given out by command line GUI.
But once router loads, and i log in to it, i see my old version v6.21.1 or v6.24
So it does not upgrade, and does not give any error.
How much time you use same SoftwareID?
You use Software ID downloaded from Internet?

yvhitxcel · Sun Feb 22, 2015 5:45 am

ccr1036 12G-4s v6.27 hotspot not working.i didn't look the login web. my email 2338953@qq.com
Do not simply leave email, this is not one direct support service, open new thread and post your config.
If someone want help you, you get help.
All users must benefit from helping you.

interface,warning 3_WIFI: bridge port received packet with own address as source address, probably loop

why i got a lot of the warming message?how to fix

my ccr1036-12g-4s and a lot of other hardware buy only one week,,how to got Technical Support?

Spirch · Sun Feb 22, 2015 6:09 am

I have a RB951G-2HnD with v6.13 and firmware v3.14

is there any reason for me to update to 6.27 if I currently have no issue?

this is a simple home router setup

Sun Feb 22, 2015 8:11 am

If you are happy with your setup, don't touch it.

rextended · Sun Feb 22, 2015 1:17 pm

If you are happy with your setup, don't touch it.

+100

docmarius · Sun Feb 22, 2015 2:16 pm

There is a saying: Better is good's worst enemy.

vortex · Sun Feb 22, 2015 5:16 pm

Upgrading from 5.26 to 6.25 or 6.27 enabled ppp, wireless, and hotspot (these last two very bad).

deanMKD1 · Mon Feb 23, 2015 2:48 am

@vortex what is very bad with wireless and hotspot?

vortex · Mon Feb 23, 2015 3:19 am

That I had them disabled and the upgrade silently activated them, and I don't know if that results in a wide open network.

Mon Feb 23, 2015 9:41 am

A loop [or bridge loop] occurs in computer networks when there is more than one Layer 2 (OSI model) path between two endpoints (e.g. multiple connections between two network hosts). Examine your network topology and find duplicate connection and remove it from your network.

ccr1036 12G-4s v6.27 hotspot not working.i didn't look the login web. my email 2338953@qq.com
Do not simply leave email, this is not one direct support service, open new thread and post your config.
If someone want help you, you get help.
All users must benefit from helping you.
interface,warning 3_WIFI: bridge port received packet with own address as source address, probably loop

why i got a lot of the warming message?how to fix

my ccr1036-12g-4s and a lot of other hardware buy only one week,,how to got Technical Support?

Mon Feb 23, 2015 10:08 am

I just upgraded to 6.27 on my RB711-5HnD and upgraded the routerboard to 3.22.
It looked good at the start so I ran a speed test at http://www.speedtest.net/.
The router disconnected, then I ran a wireless scan it shows no ap's at all.
Rebooting makes it reconnect but it disconnects as soon as I try a speed test.
Downgrading back to 6.23 make everything work again.

0 R name="wlan1" mtu=1500 mac-address=XX:XX:XX:XX:XX:XX arp=enabled interface-type=Atheros AR92xx mode=station-pseudobridge ssid="" frequency=5300
band=5ghz-a/n channel-width=20/40mhz-ht-below scan-list=default wireless-protocol=any wds-mode=disabled wds-default-bridge=none wds-ignore-ssid=no
bridge-mode=enabled default-authentication=yes default-forwarding=yes default-ap-tx-limit=0 default-client-tx-limit=0 hide-ssid=no
security-profile=default compression=no

Please provide us more information about your setup. The AP or this Client router stopped working?
Also send the support output files to support@mikrotik.com

simaskkk · Mon Feb 23, 2015 12:23 pm

Queue Tree queues does not work in 6.27 (all counters stays on 0) (at least for GRE tunnel interfaces)

Very poor performance for single TCP flow over GRE tunnel.

zyzelis · Mon Feb 23, 2015 1:38 pm

Queue Tree queues does not work in 6.27 (all counters stays on 0) (at least for GRE tunnel interfaces)
Very poor performance for single TCP flow over GRE tunnel.

If queue type is "default" Try to change default queue type to another eg from pfifo to RED. and write here if it helps.

Mon Feb 23, 2015 1:53 pm

simaskkk - Does problem persist if you disable/enable queues? Do you have scripts/schedulers or something else which might change queue settings while they are working?

simaskkk · Mon Feb 23, 2015 4:15 pm

I will do some testing to figure out where the problem is and will open the case soon.

simaskkk - Does problem persist if you disable/enable queues? Do you have scripts/schedulers or something else which might change queue settings while they are working?

Mon Feb 23, 2015 4:35 pm

It seems that SPF status is broken on CRS-125, with no info shown except 'module present' (S-31DLC20D).
Module works correctly nevertheless.

It's possible that system didn't manage to get correct info or get anything at all from eeprom/ddmi on transceiver. In cases like that after several attempts system will give up and leave those fields empty. Replugging the module, reboot or power cycle might help.

docmarius · Mon Feb 23, 2015 11:12 pm

Tnx krisjanis,
Replugging the module did solve the issue - all info is in its place

Tue Feb 24, 2015 8:23 am

rextended - We finally managed to fix crash when PPPoE was being configured over EoIP. Fix should be included in 6.28rc5 and later versions of RouterOS.

rextended · Tue Feb 24, 2015 10:41 am

rextended - We finally managed to fix crash when PPPoE was being configured over EoIP. Fix should be included in 6.28rc5 and later versions of RouterOS.

YES! YES! YES!
Thanks!

sparrow · Tue Feb 24, 2015 1:24 pm

What's new in 6.7 (2013-Nov-29 13:37):
*) fixed l2mtu changing on CCRs - could cause port flapping;

Changing l2mtu on any interface of my ccr 1036-12G-4S cause port flapping, shutting down all interface, someone had same problem?
This behaviour still persist on 6.27!

Tue Feb 24, 2015 3:03 pm

What's new in 6.7 (2013-Nov-29 13:37):
*) fixed l2mtu changing on CCRs - could cause port flapping;
Changing l2mtu on any interface of my ccr 1036-12G-4S cause port flapping, shutting down all interface, someone had same problem?
This behaviour still persist on 6.27!

Although similar, this behaviour (one all interface reload after L2MTU changes) is not related to the problem in v6.7.
Users are now warned in wiki about such behaviour.
Warning: L2MTU configuration changes on Cloud Core Routers evoke all interface reload (link down - link up) due to necessary internal processes.
It is recommended to configure L2MTU with caution by keeping in mind that it can cause short interruption with connected devices.

wotoni · Tue Feb 24, 2015 5:27 pm

Hey, can we please have the .torrent files back for ALL RouterOS. I don't believe that I am the only one that uses the .torrent to download RouterOS. I myself support multiple different hardware flavors and to download each file separately can be a pain.

Thanks!

bax · Tue Feb 24, 2015 7:27 pm

Well last night i was try to upgrade my x86 ROS to v6.27 ...
Userman is give error like "radius server not responding" so i must fast downgrade to v6.26.
On other routerboard devices it looks that all is fine.
Can someone try to upgrade device with userman ?

micromaxi · Tue Feb 24, 2015 7:34 pm

Funny i just noticed on the download package from this site that the 6.27 software has been updated (release date is now 23-02-2015 where it was 11-02-2015) however i just cant find any changes in the changelog. And why hasnt the version number not been altered ?

Normis ?

Tue Feb 24, 2015 8:08 pm

Funny i just noticed on the download package from this site that the 6.27 software has been updated (release date is now 23-02-2015 where it was 11-02-2015) however i just cant find any changes in the changelog. And why hasnt the version number not been altered ?

Normis ?

The release date changed because we added "smips" RouterOS version for the hAP lite boards in the website. There are no other changes.

hossain2004a · Tue Feb 24, 2015 9:14 pm

Well last night i was try to upgrade my x86 ROS to v6.27 ...
Userman is give error like "radius server not responding" so i must fast downgrade to v6.26.
On other routerboard devices it looks that all is fine.
Can someone try to upgrade device with userman ?

It's been month, I've upgrade router with userman package, but no luck. Still have that error "not responding...." searched the forums and found no solution.
But it works fine except sometimes

finalcutroot · Tue Feb 24, 2015 9:39 pm

This is the third time
when i open winbox and goto the Interfaces
the router crash
i use simple script/scheduler to turn off interfaces on specific time

hapi · Tue Feb 24, 2015 11:01 pm

This is the third time
when i open winbox and goto the Interfaces
the router crash
i use simple script/scheduler to turn off interfaces on specific time

same problem on two x86 routers. Local access is ok but print anything go to crash or not print. Router is not function. Same is fresh install 6.27 is same problem on same router.

Ljubo · Wed Feb 25, 2015 11:12 am

An error, which I don't know the meaning of, occasionally appears in the log.
I would be greateful if you could tell me if this error occurs due to a configuration fault or if someone is trying to connect but I am unable to see the IP from which it is coming from.
This started happening after upgrade 6.27, but before the update I didn't see the error.

Wed Feb 25, 2015 12:19 pm

Having three mipsbe routers connected to internet:

A: running SSTP server accepting SSTP conections from B and C
B: running SSTP server and client, connecting to A and accepting connections from C
C: running SSTP client and connecting to A and B

A had 6.25, B had 6.18, C had 6.25 and everything worked fine.

Decided to update A from 6.25 to 6.27. Result: Connection from B was fine. C was not able to establish connection.

Decided to update C from 6.25 to 6.27. Result: C is not able to establish connections both to A and B. The disk1 that was working in 6.25 was renamed to disk3 and new disk1 appeared – this should not happen!
And what is more: not running SSTP clients show incoming packets and data in interface overview. How to? Torch is blank…

Reverting both A and C to 6.25 and waiting a correction. After downgrade both A and C to 6.25 everything works correctly like before.

Supout was sent to support, ticket nr. [Ticket#2015021466000104]

To this ticket. I received today info from Mikrotik support that I should have all involved ros devices at the same level (6.27). But the ticket was also about the SSTP not working between two 6.27 devices. So the advice was false.

I found the solution myself: it is the PFS option that is not documented. Correct settings allows communication between both 6.27 as between different versions (for example 6.27-6.18 or 6.27-6.25 in my case).

Mikrotik should take care about the documentation if changing/adding anything!

siavashblade · Wed Feb 25, 2015 1:07 pm

hi guys I have a problem with this can you help me?
I didn't know how to make topic nor did I fine an appropriate place to post it so if you can help me or direct me to the best location I would appreciate it. thanks
first of all after I enable DDNS, in the status section it tells me that:
"DDNS server received request from ip ...(the public ip adress)... but your local ip was 192.168.1.6 (which is my gateway ip). DDNS service might not work."
and I can't ping the DNS name it gives me 100% timeout then I've added this command:"/ip firewall filter add action=accept chain=input disabled=no dst-port=8291 protocol=tcp place-before=0"
but this didnt help either!

what should I do?
I have ip cameras in my work place and I want to watch them from home via this feature.
can you help me?

mars · Wed Feb 25, 2015 2:44 pm

anybody having a problem with simple queues and mangle rules in ros 6.27
the mangle rules are not marking the traffic properly so simple queues are not working
in ros 6.26 it works with no problems

deanMKD1 · Thu Feb 26, 2015 1:35 am

hi guys I have a problem with this can you help me?
I didn't know how to make topic nor did I fine an appropriate place to post it so if you can help me or direct me to the best location I would appreciate it. thanks
first of all after I enable DDNS, in the status section it tells me that:
"DDNS server received request from ip ...(the public ip adress)... but your local ip was 192.168.1.6 (which is my gateway ip). DDNS service might not work."
and I can't ping the DNS name it gives me 100% timeout then I've added this command:"/ip firewall filter add action=accept chain=input disabled=no dst-port=8291 protocol=tcp place-before=0"
but this didnt help either!
what should I do?
I have ip cameras in my work place and I want to watch them from home via this feature.
can you help me?

You dont need to add filters in firewall to gain access to your cameras.! In what LAN port is connected your camera? Are you sure that port is properly forwarded?

Farhadgh · Thu Feb 26, 2015 2:36 am

Hello normis. I wanted to inform you of this bug in case of you didn't read that:
http://forum.mikrotik.com/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=94415
It's making me a lot of effort.

ofca · Thu Feb 26, 2015 4:42 am

so when all_packages torrent/zip will be back?

siavashblade · Thu Feb 26, 2015 7:37 am

hi guys I have a problem with this can you help me?
I didn't know how to make topic nor did I fine an appropriate place to post it so if you can help me or direct me to the best location I would appreciate it. thanks
first of all after I enable DDNS, in the status section it tells me that:
"DDNS server received request from ip ...(the public ip adress)... but your local ip was 192.168.1.6 (which is my gateway ip). DDNS service might not work."
and I can't ping the DNS name it gives me 100% timeout then I've added this command:"/ip firewall filter add action=accept chain=input disabled=no dst-port=8291 protocol=tcp place-before=0"
but this didnt help either!
what should I do?
I have ip cameras in my work place and I want to watch them from home via this feature.
can you help me?
You dont need to add filters in firewall to gain access to your cameras.! In what LAN port is connected your camera? Are you sure that port is properly forwarded?

all cameras plus computers and server are attached to a switch and one cable from switch is attached to ether 2 of my mikrotik and one cable from the dsl modem is attached to the ether1 of my mikrotik.
my internet is working on mikrotik gateway and I can ping 8.8.8.8 from winbox plus I've enabled ip cloud and it gave me the dns but I cant use it, it gave me 100% timeout. so I dont know what to do!

VagnerBecker · Thu Feb 26, 2015 3:22 pm

I'm having trouble with IPv6, the interface I try to add an ip starting from a pool is in red and does not work until you restart the equipment, is an example

ipv6 pool add prefix=2001:db8::/56 prefix-length=64 name=pool1
ipv6 address add interface=ether1 address=::1/64 from-pool=pool1

karina · Thu Feb 26, 2015 3:29 pm

MikroTik 951G-2HnD.

RouterOS v6.23

RouterOS v6.27

Awesome improvement MikroTik!
For me it works faster...
305mbit to 345mbit...
Are you sure your speedtest.net server gives full speed?

I can confirm that I also had a speed hit on V 6.27. BAck to 6.19 all good again. I also noticed a degrading of voip quality. This was on a 1100AH. Personally for me with the config I use 6.19 is still the most stable. It is possibe the upgrade is not taking properly somewhere and a fresh install would be fine but I have not tested this

deanMKD1 · Thu Feb 26, 2015 3:57 pm

hi guys I have a problem with this can you help me?
I didn't know how to make topic nor did I fine an appropriate place to post it so if you can help me or direct me to the best location I would appreciate it. thanks
first of all after I enable DDNS, in the status section it tells me that:
"DDNS server received request from ip ...(the public ip adress)... but your local ip was 192.168.1.6 (which is my gateway ip). DDNS service might not work."
and I can't ping the DNS name it gives me 100% timeout then I've added this command:"/ip firewall filter add action=accept chain=input disabled=no dst-port=8291 protocol=tcp place-before=0"
but this didnt help either!
what should I do?
I have ip cameras in my work place and I want to watch them from home via this feature.
can you help me?
You dont need to add filters in firewall to gain access to your cameras.! In what LAN port is connected your camera? Are you sure that port is properly forwarded?
all cameras plus computers and server are attached to a switch and one cable from switch is attached to ether 2 of my mikrotik and one cable from the dsl modem is attached to the ether1 of my mikrotik.
my internet is working on mikrotik gateway and I can ping 8.8.8.8 from winbox plus I've enabled ip cloud and it gave me the dns but I cant use it, it gave me 100% timeout. so I dont know what to do!

Dude open a new thread, and will found the solution for your problem. This is not right thread for this problem.

LaZyLion · Fri Feb 27, 2015 11:43 pm

LaZyLion - Since 6.27 "/system package update check-for-updates" is dynamic and gives output to console. That has caused changes.

You can use command like this:
:put ([/system package update check-for-updates once as-value ] -> "current-version")

Great, that gives me the current version, which I can also get using

 :put [/system resource get version ]

But when I attempt to get the latest-version, it just returns a blank.

:put ([/system package update check-for-updates once as-value ] -> "latest-version")

Status isn't very helpful either:

:put ([/system package update check-for-updates once as-value ] -> "status")

resolving upgrade.mikrotik.com

Obviously the command needs time to go online and get the information,
so how do I get it to wait?

Any suggestions on how to get the latest-version without doing

/tool fetch url="something.mikrotik.com/something"

Basdno · Sat Feb 28, 2015 3:02 pm

hi guys I have a problem with this can you help me?
I didn't know how to make topic nor did I fine an appropriate place to post it so if you can help me or direct me to the best location I would appreciate it. thanks
first of all after I enable DDNS, in the status section it tells me that:
"DDNS server received request from ip ...(the public ip adress)... but your local ip was 192.168.1.6 (which is my gateway ip). DDNS service might not work."
and I can't ping the DNS name it gives me 100% timeout then I've added this command:"/ip firewall filter add action=accept chain=input disabled=no dst-port=8291 protocol=tcp place-before=0"
but this didnt help either!
what should I do?
I have ip cameras in my work place and I want to watch them from home via this feature.
can you help me?

You dont need to add filters in firewall to gain access to your cameras.! In what LAN port is connected your camera? Are you sure that port is properly forwarded?

all cameras plus computers and server are attached to a switch and one cable from switch is attached to ether 2 of my mikrotik and one cable from the dsl modem is attached to the ether1 of my mikrotik.
my internet is working on mikrotik gateway and I can ping 8.8.8.8 from winbox plus I've enabled ip cloud and it gave me the dns but I cant use it, it gave me 100% timeout. so I dont know what to do!

Dude open a new thread, and will found the solution for your problem. This is not right thread for this problem.

This is clearly the wrong topic for this, a new topic under GENERAL f.ex. would probably have been a lot better place for this!
BUT:
The problem is clearly stated in the error message in Mikrotik winbox, and translated it says your Mikrotik router that recieved the dns adress is BEHIND a Firewalled/NATted gateway. Meaning it is not possible to directly connect to that mikrotik-router from the internett.
This again means if you want to use that DNS adress via the internett, I think you will have to make a NAT RULE(s) in your GATEWAY-ROUTER(Probably your DSL modem or something) that sends all requests the gateway recieves from the internet for that dns-adress to be forwarded directly to your Mikrotik router.
This feature works best and easiest if your Mikrotik router IS the Gateway, since it then has direct contact with the internet.
Hope that helps you understand the problem and how to solve it a little better.

Cheers

rextended · Sat Feb 28, 2015 3:24 pm

MikroTik 951G-2HnD.

RouterOS v6.23

RouterOS v6.27

Awesome improvement MikroTik!
For me it works faster...
305mbit to 345mbit...
Are you sure your speedtest.net server gives full speed?

I can confirm that I also had a speed hit on V 6.27. BAck to 6.19 all good again. I also noticed a degrading of voip quality. This was on a 1100AH. Personally for me with the config I use 6.19 is still the most stable. It is possibe the upgrade is not taking properly somewhere and a fresh install would be fine but I have not tested this

For me 6.27 work faster than 6.24 and previous version used (USED, not only TESTED) on all my network infrastructure
(except for CPE for the huge amount of time to update it all, actually all the CPE are 6.20)

BUT...

the strange thing on pictures:
no one notice the differencies on minutes between the two images?
reboot the machine to start new RouterOS, and start and complete the test again after only 3 minutes???
Or I have misunderstand the images?
I save the picture for not be removed or altered:

4138062096.png

4138069907.png

P.S.
FOR ALL USERS:
I suggest to STOP TO USE SPEEDTEST FOR DO THE TEST (if you not are the owner of the other side...)
Use two other machine to do the test properly. On this way you can also test different packet size and tipology of traffic.
You have never the warranty than the service, on the other side, are overcharged from other users...
I do not think than the various "speedtest" servers have unlimited & warranted bandwidth for you and the all the other users.

Sat Feb 28, 2015 9:13 pm

Where are the seconds? I see 3 minutes difference...

Awax · Sun Mar 01, 2015 10:55 am

Hi, ceased to work at my RB750G service port PPTP, for resumption of work it is necessary to add the rule:

chain=input action=accept protocol=tcp in-interface=WAN dst-port=1723 log=no log-prefix=""

worked without it earlier

Second question or wish, as you wish. You can write "torrent client" as it is realized in other routers, for installation by a separate package? I would think it very much increased appeal of your product.

galaxynet · Sun Mar 01, 2015 12:49 pm

For anyone with the same issues. I have contacted support. I expect to hear from them soon. Below is an excerpt of what was sent.

I have a RB912UAG-5HPnD w/a Mikrotik 802.ac card with ROS 6.27 installed with the wireless-fp package active.

I have attached the autosupout.rif file.

1) After a ping watchdog timeout, the unit will try to reboot, it never makes it. I can only assume from the log that it is a kernel panic that causes the lockup during the reboot process, i.e., shows rebooting because of ping watchdop timeout, logs a few other items then kernel panic during the boot process and stops there.

2) After 3 bandwidth test runs I can no longer access this board from winbox or any other method, telnet/mac-telnet, ssh, it must be powered off/on in order to regain control. It will however pass data through during this time.

3) In the log there are references to kernel panic and script errors. After this last reboot, all files are gone. It will not create a backup file from the file menu in winbox.

I have another board exactly the same except it does not have your 802.11ac card in it. It does however have the wireless-fp package installed and active.

I included the script error message from the log here: 08:57:15 script, error script error: error - contact MikroTik support and send a supout file (2)

dada · Sun Mar 01, 2015 1:35 pm

For anyone with the same issues. I have contacted support. I expect to hear from them soon. Below is an excerpt of what was sent.

I have a RB912UAG-5HPnD w/a Mikrotik 802.ac card with ROS 6.27 installed with the wireless-fp package active.

Hi,
do you lose connection to the board through WLAN or through ethernet?

Maggiore81 · Sun Mar 01, 2015 11:22 pm

One bug discovered from6.25.

in the routes list, I have set a route, with "check gateway" option enabled, so if the router is unreachable, it disables the route.
With 6.25 works, with 6.27 doesnt work. Even if the router is unreachable, the route is still up.

rextended · Mon Mar 02, 2015 12:59 pm

Where are the seconds? I see 3 minutes difference...

Ok, misspelled and fixed, thanks

JackANSI · Mon Mar 02, 2015 9:37 pm

the strange thing on pictures:
no one notice the differencies on minutes between the two images?
reboot the machine to start new RouterOS, and start and complete the test again after only 3 minutes???
Or I have misunderstand the images?
I save the picture for not be removed or altered:
4138062096.png

4138069907.png
P.S.
FOR ALL USERS:
I suggest to STOP TO USE SPEEDTEST FOR DO THE TEST (if you not are the owner of the other side...)
Use two other machine to do the test properly. On this way you can also test different packet size and tipology of traffic.
You have never the warranty than the service, on the other side, are overcharged from other users...
I do not think than the various "speedtest" servers have unlimited & warranted bandwidth for you and the all the other users.

So you're saying that he couldn't possibly have two devices and just swapped the devices?

Even with one device, 3 minutes for something as simple as a firmware upgrade is quite feasible. Do speed test, click upgrade & reboot, do speed test. Very easy to do in 3 minutes (could also be as much as 3 minutes, 59 seconds since we don't have seconds to refer to).

Two, 3-minute-spaced speedtest.net readings are a little more realistic than a lab/bench test in my opinion. A lab test will only be more consistent over a long time period (i.e. months or years or comparing old generation hardware to new gen without re-benchmarking the old).

I couldn't even push 30% throughput of what the MikroTik benchmarks says my device could do. I put the old Cisco equipment back in place with upgraded interface modules and it handles the load like a champ. The MikroTik boxes are just wireless AP/hotspot for visitors now.

rextended · Mon Mar 02, 2015 10:42 pm

So you're saying that he couldn't possibly have two devices and just swapped the devices?

Yes is possible, but the test must be done also crossing version and routeboards, or the test are incomplete...

Mon Mar 02, 2015 11:52 pm

3 minutes are perfectly enough for running test, upgrade and test again. I don't see any problem with it.

galaxynet · Tue Mar 03, 2015 5:57 am

Support -
Just as a follow-up to my ticket, I reverted to just the wireless package (disabled the wireless-fp package) no issues with running bandwidth tests or having the RB get rebooted by the ping watchdog. So it is definitely something with either the .AC card and/or the wireless-fp package.

Thanks.

Thom

sparrow · Tue Mar 03, 2015 11:08 am

Hi guys, is it normal that over a pppoe-client tunnel using mppe128 encoding I have a lot of rx errors?This on every fw I use
If I disable encoding (mschap1 and mschap2) all goes well without tx/rx errors...I see this behaviour on all client that use MPPE encoding.

error.JPG

Tue Mar 03, 2015 11:35 am

LaZyLion - We fixed print function for "/system package update" in latest 6.28rcX versions. Now something like this might work for you:
{
/system package update check-for-updates once
delay 5
:put [/system package update get latest-version ]
}

First function will force RouterOS to check for a latest version. Delay can be reduced but must be longer than time needed to find out latest version. Last function will give latest available version of RouterOS.

PastuhMedvedey · Thu Mar 05, 2015 3:18 pm

1. Perform the upgrade RB SXT 5HPnD to version 6.27
2. When you try to create a file - Supout.rif CPU usage becomes 100 percent.
3. After creating the file - Supout.rif CPU usage is 100 percent.

1.png

finalcutroot · Sun Mar 08, 2015 2:21 am

this script on (rb750 , os 6.27 , winbox Winbox 3.0rc5) with hotspot cause crash after a while

the crash occur when you go to interface menu

/system scheduler
add interval=1d name=Start on-event=Start policy=ftp,reboot,read,write,policy,test,password,sniff,sensitive start-date=dec/07/2014 start-time=07:00:00
add interval=1d name=Stop on-event=Stop policy=ftp,reboot,read,write,policy,test,password,sniff,sensitive start-date=dec/07/2014 start-time=16:00:00

/system script
add name=Start policy=ftp,reboot,read,write,policy,test,password,sniff,sensitive source="interface ethernet enable ether3-slave-local"
add name=Stop policy=ftp,reboot,read,write,policy,test,password,sniff,sensitive source="interface ethernet disable ether3-slave-local"

LaZyLion · Sun Mar 08, 2015 9:14 am

Strods

LaZyLion - We fixed print function for "/system package update" in latest 6.28rcX versions. Now something like this might work for you:
{
/system package update check-for-updates once
delay 5
:put [/system package update get latest-version ]
}

First function will force RouterOS to check for a latest version. Delay can be reduced but must be longer than time needed to find out latest version. Last function will give latest available version of RouterOS.

Your suggestion works in 6.26; that's what I've been using. But in 6.27:

[admin@my-router] > /system package update check-for-updates once
  current-version: 6.27
           status: resolving upgrade.mikrotik.com
[admin@my-router] > :put [/system package update get latest-version ]
input does not match any value of value-name

I guess I will wait for 6.28 unless there is another way.

Maybe I can wireshark where routeros pulls the data from then use /tool fetch to get it myself via script. Hmmmm...

conecting · Sun Mar 08, 2015 9:55 pm

deleted becouse it can not be repeated

Sun Mar 08, 2015 10:12 pm

I see no problem with upnp at 6.27. It works fine with automatic port redirection.

conecting · Sun Mar 08, 2015 10:41 pm

deleted becouse it can not be repeated

conecting · Sun Mar 08, 2015 10:50 pm

deleted becouse it can not be repeated

rkau045 · Mon Mar 09, 2015 1:29 am

I fail to see the problem here. The rules are processed in order from top to bottom.

Sent from my LG-D800 using Tapatalk

Kadafi · Wed Mar 11, 2015 9:06 am

Upgraded CCR-1016 6.12 -> 6.27 (clean configuration) = Dead brick, reboot loop.

Wed Mar 11, 2015 10:04 am

Please attach Null Modem cable to your router and provide us with console output that you get from router.

Kadafi · Wed Mar 11, 2015 10:13 am

Console was non-functional, we tried several cables com@9600/8/1 and com@115200/8/1
Restored with netboot. Clean install 6.27 is ok.

ruudux · Wed Mar 11, 2015 10:53 pm

Hi,
I ran the upgrade from routeros 5.24 to 6.27. After the reboot, i am only able to login using telnet/ssh but cann't login anymore using the webfig. Allready changed the password, deleted browser cache. Any idea's? Error message after filling in the login form: internal server error. In the log i do not see a login entree using http (ssh is showed normally)

finalcutroot · Sat Mar 14, 2015 11:00 pm

There is abug drive me crazy

when i add static ip address for int eth1 its gone after tow or three day

and when i add static ip address then goto quick set up , just click apply the added static rout also gone

win9x · Sun Mar 15, 2015 2:01 am

whats better

upgrading directly from 6.24 to 6.27

or upgrade virsion next version

6.25 then 6.26 -- 6.27

poizzon · Mon Mar 16, 2015 12:19 am

[poi@HotSpotAs] > sys resource print
uptime: 1h48m46s
version: 6.27
build-time: Feb/11/2015 13:24:13
free-memory: 3784.0KiB
total-memory: 32.0MiB
cpu: MIPS 24Kc V7.4
cpu-count: 1
cpu-frequency: 300MHz
cpu-load: 19%
free-hdd-space: 43.6MiB
total-hdd-space: 64.0MiB
write-sect-since-reboot: 21992
write-sect-total: 62832584
bad-blocks: 0.8%
architecture-name: mipsbe
board-name: RB450
platform: MikroTik
[poi@HotSpotAs] >
[poi@HotSpotAs] >
[poi@HotSpotAs] >
[poi@HotSpotAs] > tool profile
action timed out - try again, if error continues contact MikroTik support and send a supout file (13)
[poi@HotSpotAs] >

Mon Mar 16, 2015 9:05 am

poizzon, did you do what this log line asked?

ATROX · Mon Mar 16, 2015 9:41 am

I use about 15 IPsec tunnels
Sometimes IPsec is down. Reboot, kill connetctions and flush SAs do not help. Rarely identify problems. Developers - Check the IPsec please!
Router OS v6.27
CCR1036-12G-4S and RB951G-2HnD

noyo · Mon Mar 16, 2015 5:36 pm

Why 6.28rc13 has been removed?

pbr3000 · Mon Mar 16, 2015 6:34 pm

Why 6.28rc13 has been removed?

+1. Good question...

honzam · Mon Mar 16, 2015 7:22 pm

Why 6.28rc13 has been removed?
+1. Good question...

Good question, but bad topic:
http://forum.mikrotik.com/viewtopic.php?f=21&t=94352

poizzon · Mon Mar 16, 2015 11:49 pm

poizzon, did you do what this log line asked?

nop, i can't connet...

after disconnecting access point's and reeboting, i can connect, cleared user manager logs, it seems working for now.

JanezFord · Tue Mar 17, 2015 11:43 am

interface,warning 3_WIFI: bridge port received packet with own address as source address, probably loop

why i got a lot of the warming message?how to fix

my ccr1036-12g-4s and a lot of other hardware buy only one week,,how to got Technical Support?

I get lots of this messages on my setup ... I use capsmanv2 with multiple APs configured to provide same said over a building ... this warning pops up when client goes from one AP to another ... sometimes RSTP disables the port long enough to make CAP drop connection due to timeout and loose all of its clients which is annoying.

JF.

hzdrus · Tue Mar 17, 2015 3:17 pm

We found EoIP on 6.27 to be very buggy on CCRs and RB750.

Frames passing through bridge would randomly get corrupted. Removing and adding interface to the bridge may temporarily fix the problem.

Tue Mar 17, 2015 3:48 pm

Having three mipsbe routers connected to internet:

A: running SSTP server accepting SSTP conections from B and C
B: running SSTP server and client, connecting to A and accepting connections from C
C: running SSTP client and connecting to A and B

A had 6.25, B had 6.18, C had 6.25 and everything worked fine.

Decided to update A from 6.25 to 6.27. Result: Connection from B was fine. C was not able to establish connection.

Decided to update C from 6.25 to 6.27. Result: C is not able to establish connections both to A and B. The disk1 that was working in 6.25 was renamed to disk3 and new disk1 appeared – this should not happen!
And what is more: not running SSTP clients show incoming packets and data in interface overview. How to? Torch is blank…

Reverting both A and C to 6.25 and waiting a correction. After downgrade both A and C to 6.25 everything works correctly like before.

Supout was sent to support, ticket nr. [Ticket#2015021466000104]

To this ticket. I received today info from Mikrotik support that I should have all involved ros devices at the same level (6.27). But the ticket was also about the SSTP not working between two 6.27 devices. So the advice was false.

I found the solution myself: it is the PFS option that is not documented. Correct settings allows communication between both 6.27 as between different versions (for example 6.27-6.18 or 6.27-6.25 in my case).

Mikrotik should take care about the documentation if changing/adding anything!

Just to let you know. This problem was confirmed by mikrotik to be an error finally.
After my further investigation, it is not linked to PFS nor to ros versions mismatch nor to SSTP only, as it also happens to L2TP. The basic of the problem lies in the dynamically assigned IP to the client device that suddenly becomes ivalid without any obvious reason at the clients ip address list.

For those who suffer by this problem like me, you can switch off the sstp/l2tp client, remove the invalid addresses from address lists, reboot the client and switch on the sstp/l2tp client. Then it should behave good at least for some time...

I have got a message that it was passed to programmers for correction. Hope it will be included in 6.28.

hossain2004a · Tue Mar 17, 2015 7:56 pm

I'd like to know when will you correct the bug in UM?

which is after you add new langauge and open new windows (e.g. session list) you can not close the new window.
already supports tell me they are working on it.

gabrielpike · Thu Mar 19, 2015 3:10 pm

I am not really complaining about 6.27 but after upgrading my core routers I did notice a spike in CPU usage. My reason for updating was to fix the outdated NTP issue. Both routers were running 6.7. In winbox under tools->profile the routers show a higher CPU for both routing and firewall. Again not a complaint just an observation.

SQx · Thu Mar 19, 2015 7:45 pm

Hello,
On RB751u-2HnD with v6.27 not work Health Status and Ethernet 5 error with auto-negotiate, no cable but led is on, (temporary solution - clear option auto-negotiate).

brauser · Thu Mar 19, 2015 11:41 pm

so when all_packages torrent/zip will be back?

+1 for this.
and please, dont repeat this again =]

cheers

Fri Mar 20, 2015 8:26 am

hossain2004a - Fix for testing is available starting since RouterOS 6.28rc14 version. It will be included in next full release of RouterOS 6.28.

Fri Mar 20, 2015 8:40 am

SQx - We are not being able to reproduce your issue. Could you please send supout file from your device to support@mikrotik.com? Seems like it depends on your configuration. As for a System/Health problem - there is nothing to show in Health for this device. It should be empty.

SQx · Fri Mar 20, 2015 11:36 am

strods, please see [Ticket#2015032066000252]

Fri Mar 20, 2015 1:50 pm

SQx - reply to this ticket is already sent to you

SQx · Fri Mar 20, 2015 1:51 pm

strods, added new supout.rif, autosupout.rif

diode · Sat Mar 21, 2015 2:00 pm

hi,

I have a problem starting nstream to be unusable with ac hardware. I have swapped a RB912 with a netbox5 on a place were nstream was working really good (uptimes of clients ofthen 10-20 days before getting a not polled for too long), now it disconnects ALL clients simultainously every hour or so (not polled for too long).

wireless-fp package
a/n mode

please make nstream working stable again, for most of my sites it gives AT LEAST double tcp performace at the client side than NV2. I'm worried now about using the newest hardware as this is even less usable with nstreme than old hardware.
I can't simply downgrade all my clients to just 50% of the bandwidth just for using another protocol.

thanks

ps.: btw I have around 450 mikrotiks in use here, and I'm doing wisp since 2000

Mon Mar 23, 2015 10:53 am

hi,

I have a problem starting nstream to be unusable with ac hardware. I have swapped a RB912 with a netbox5 on a place were nstream was working really good (uptimes of clients ofthen 10-20 days before getting a not polled for too long), now it disconnects ALL clients simultainously every hour or so (not polled for too long).

wireless-fp package
a/n mode

please make nstream working stable again, for most of my sites it gives AT LEAST double tcp performace at the client side than NV2. I'm worried now about using the newest hardware as this is even less usable with nstreme than old hardware.
I can't simply downgrade all my clients to just 50% of the bandwidth just for using another protocol.

thanks

ps.: btw I have around 450 mikrotiks in use here, and I'm doing wisp since 2000

Please contact support@mikrotik.com so we could check the configuration of the board and setup environment. Then we could try to reproduce this problem in the lab with the AC boards.

Mon Mar 23, 2015 12:33 pm

interface,warning 3_WIFI: bridge port received packet with own address as source address, probably loop

why i got a lot of the warming message?how to fix

my ccr1036-12g-4s and a lot of other hardware buy only one week,,how to got Technical Support?

What ports do you have on bridge?
It seems that there is a loop in your network, that is caused by bridged interfaces.

mangust · Mon Mar 23, 2015 8:31 pm

An error, which I don't know the meaning of, occasionally appears in the log.
I would be greateful if you could tell me if this error occurs due to a configuration fault or if someone is trying to connect but I am unable to see the IP from which it is coming from.
This started happening after upgrade 6.27, but before the update I didn't see the error.

20:32:31 ipsec,error failed to get valid proposal. 
20:32:31 ipsec,error failed to pre-process ph1 packet (side: 1, status 1). 
20:32:31 ipsec,error phase1 negotiation failed. 
20:32:41 ipsec,error failed to get valid proposal. 
20:32:41 ipsec,error failed to pre-process ph1 packet (side: 1, status 1). 
20:32:41 ipsec,error phase1 negotiation failed. 
20:32:51 ipsec,error failed to get valid proposal. 
20:32:51 ipsec,error failed to pre-process ph1 packet (side: 1, status 1). 
20:32:51 ipsec,error phase1 negotiation failed. 
20:33:01 ipsec,error failed to get valid proposal. 
20:33:01 ipsec,error failed to pre-process ph1 packet (side: 1, status 1). 
20:33:01 ipsec,error phase1 negotiation failed.
20:33:05 ipsec,error phase1 negotiation failed due to time up X.X.X.X[500]<=>Z.Z.Z.Z[500] 5654bdb3a0805b43:00000000000000 
20:33:05 ipsec,error failed to get valid proposal. 
20:33:05 ipsec,error failed to pre-process ph1 packet (side: 1, status 1). 
20:33:05 ipsec,error phase1 negotiation failed.

I have exactly the same issue with IPSEC tunnel between 6.25 & 6.27.
IS it me , or i shoud try to downgrade to 6.25 ?

DjM · Tue Mar 24, 2015 9:02 am

Just to let you know. This problem was confirmed by mikrotik to be an error finally.
After my further investigation, it is not linked to PFS nor to ros versions mismatch nor to SSTP only, as it also happens to L2TP. The basic of the problem lies in the dynamically assigned IP to the client device that suddenly becomes ivalid without any obvious reason at the clients ip address list.

For those who suffer by this problem like me, you can switch off the sstp/l2tp client, remove the invalid addresses from address lists, reboot the client and switch on the sstp/l2tp client. Then it should behave good at least for some time...

I have got a message that it was passed to programmers for correction. Hope it will be included in 6.28.

Do you have any SNAT on the network path from SSTP client to SSTP server which is configured out of SSTP client?

SSTP client ---> some router with SNAT ---> SSTP server

I have the same issue and instead of disable/remove/reboot I have found another workaround:

1) disable SSTP client interface
2) remove invalid IP address (if there is still any)
3) wait around 30s when the connection is removed from IP conntrack or manually remove it
4) enable the SSTP client interface and it is working

Please let me know if this workaround working also for you.

tgyula · Wed Mar 25, 2015 7:28 pm

Hey, can we please have the .torrent files back for ALL RouterOS. I don't believe that I am the only one that uses the .torrent to download RouterOS. I myself support multiple different hardware flavors and to download each file separately can be a pain.

Thanks!

Not only are you! Mikrotik: please come back torrent download!

mars · Fri Mar 27, 2015 5:58 pm

Hey, can we please have the .torrent files back for ALL RouterOS. I don't believe that I am the only one that uses the .torrent to download RouterOS. I myself support multiple different hardware flavors and to download each file separately can be a pain.

Thanks!

Not only are you! Mikrotik: please come back torrent download!

+10000.....

alobci · Mon Apr 06, 2015 12:04 am

I cannot access to user manager on mikrotik after i turn off the router bord i turn it on then its not working maybe its damage what can i do ?

steen · Mon Apr 06, 2015 9:23 am

Hello Folks!

Trying to upgrade CCR1016 from 6.24 to 6.27 failed due to kernel panic, and it reverted back to 6.24 again and support was generated. I put up a support case to MT with support file.

Anyone who have seen this and or know how to mitigate it ?

TomosRider · Tue Apr 07, 2015 10:03 am

Steen, did you try Netinstall or just copying .npk files?
For me, 6.27 is a good release. I have it running on couple of routerboards and on those never had kernel panics, sudden reboots or resets. Everything that i have set on earlier releases (5.x) working like a charm. Big plus from me!

rextended · Tue Apr 07, 2015 2:58 pm

Please put a disclaimer inside 6.27/6.28:

"ac" models wlan work only with "wireless-fp" package enabled.
using "wireless" package on ac models cause wlan to not be recognized from the system.

RB922UAGS-5HPacD S.N.:5F820473960B

steen · Tue Apr 07, 2015 9:14 pm

Steen, did you try Netinstall or just copying .npk files?
For me, 6.27 is a good release. I have it running on couple of routerboards and on those never had kernel panics, sudden reboots or resets. Everything that i have set on earlier releases (5.x) working like a charm. Big plus from me!

I did copying the .npk file as always, I have no way to do netinstall from remote location where I am some 500km from the device.

TomosRider · Wed Apr 08, 2015 10:26 am

I had cases where i copy .npk files and then after reboot, device simply wont upgrade.Copy again in files dir and then copy to packages directorium...worked for me once. First mark old npk's for uninstall, ofc

Chupaka · Wed Apr 08, 2015 12:20 pm

I had cases where i copy .npk files and then after reboot, device simply wont upgrade

And the reason is in Log, isn't it?

TomosRider · Wed Apr 08, 2015 11:47 pm

Well, yes, but im always on hurry so i skipped checking log..

locodog · Sun Apr 12, 2015 4:10 am

There seems to be a problem with RB1100AHx when running hotspot and PPPoE at the same time. Users are unable to reach certain websites. On every other version and model of RB with same settings everything works good. Also, when RB1100AHx is running hotspot OR PPPoE, works good, but when it has both there is problem.

StubArea51 · Sun Apr 12, 2015 8:45 am

Hello Folks!

Trying to upgrade CCR1016 from 6.24 to 6.27 failed due to kernel panic, and it reverted back to 6.24 again and support was generated. I put up a support case to MT with support file.

Anyone who have seen this and or know how to mitigate it ?

If you can netinstall the router I would do that. If not, you might try upgrading to 6.25 and then go to 6.27.

ennnot · Tue Apr 14, 2015 12:02 pm

Hi!
I'm using MRTG (RB450G) with 6.27. The are some L2TP-servers. Edit comment for L2TP-interface cause a restart of L2TP-server. Is it normal process?

TomosRider · Tue Apr 14, 2015 12:42 pm

Simple...no.

killersoft · Sat Apr 18, 2015 3:47 pm

Just wondering if anyone else is suffering a failure of the "Reset Counters" in the Interface/Traffic TAB.
By where as an example in the Tx/Rx Bytes( and in my instance this interface connections to my cable modem ) and in my case shows 32Gb TX and 31Gb Rx respectively. But when I click on "Reset Counters" this does not clear to 0 as I would expect it to..

I am running a RB750G with 6.27 and v3.22 Firmware... Anyone else noticing this ?

0ldman · Sun Apr 19, 2015 3:22 am

I've got the same network loop error. There is no loop. The network has been in operation in this config for nearly 4 years, then 2PM this afternoon it just stopped.

0ldman · Mon Apr 20, 2015 5:21 pm

I figured it out. DDoS attack was spoofing MAC addresses in the network causing the equipment to falsely detect a loop.

Habib89 · Fri Apr 24, 2015 1:59 am

hi
after updating to 6.27 the internet connection become very slow and some websites doesn't even open after 10 or 20 minutes,
it was working fine in 6.14 version.

is there any solution?

Chupaka · Tue Apr 28, 2015 4:08 pm

it depends on your setup, I think

sattlink · Mon Jun 08, 2015 6:17 am

please help me, someone can tell me where I find the download version 6.27 parael npk ccr1036-12G -4S

jebz · Mon Jun 08, 2015 1:58 pm

please help me, someone can tell me where I find the download version 6.27 parael npk ccr1036-12G -4S

Try -
http://download2.mikrotik.com/routeros/ ... e-6.27.npk

tapsin · Mon Jul 27, 2015 11:04 am

6.23 Very nice 1036 version

http://download2.mikrotik.com/routeros/ ... e-6.23.npk

Royalsaleh1 · Mon Sep 21, 2015 10:09 pm

loop probably problems i need help thanks

Royalsaleh1 · Mon Sep 21, 2015 10:23 pm

hello !
I have a problem
router rb 1100
internet in
broadband
out
hotspot
output ip 10.10.10.10
i have bridge
i have ip back
10.0.0.1 on bridge client dhcp
log : ether 6 loop probably

Who is online