Hi,For anyone with the same issues. I have contacted support. I expect to hear from them soon. Below is an excerpt of what was sent.
I have a RB912UAG-5HPnD w/a Mikrotik 802.ac card with ROS 6.27 installed with the wireless-fp package active.
Ok, misspelled and fixed, thanksWhere are the seconds? I see 3 minutes difference...
So you're saying that he couldn't possibly have two devices and just swapped the devices?
the strange thing on pictures:
no one notice the differencies on minutes between the two images?
reboot the machine to start new RouterOS, and start and complete the test again after only 3 minutes???
Or I have misunderstand the images?
I save the picture for not be removed or altered: P.S.
FOR ALL USERS:
I suggest to STOP TO USE SPEEDTEST FOR DO THE TEST (if you not are the owner of the other side...)
Use two other machine to do the test properly. On this way you can also test different packet size and tipology of traffic.
You have never the warranty than the service, on the other side, are overcharged from other users...
I do not think than the various "speedtest" servers have unlimited & warranted bandwidth for you and the all the other users.
Yes is possible, but the test must be done also crossing version and routeboards, or the test are incomplete...So you're saying that he couldn't possibly have two devices and just swapped the devices?
LaZyLion - We fixed print function for "/system package update" in latest 6.28rcX versions. Now something like this might work for you:
{
/system package update check-for-updates once
delay 5
:put [/system package update get latest-version ]
}
First function will force RouterOS to check for a latest version. Delay can be reduced but must be longer than time needed to find out latest version. Last function will give latest available version of RouterOS.
[admin@my-router] > /system package update check-for-updates once
current-version: 6.27
status: resolving upgrade.mikrotik.com
[admin@my-router] > :put [/system package update get latest-version ]
input does not match any value of value-name
[poi@HotSpotAs] > sys resource print
uptime: 1h48m46s
version: 6.27
build-time: Feb/11/2015 13:24:13
free-memory: 3784.0KiB
total-memory: 32.0MiB
cpu: MIPS 24Kc V7.4
cpu-count: 1
cpu-frequency: 300MHz
cpu-load: 19%
free-hdd-space: 43.6MiB
total-hdd-space: 64.0MiB
write-sect-since-reboot: 21992
write-sect-total: 62832584
bad-blocks: 0.8%
architecture-name: mipsbe
board-name: RB450
platform: MikroTik
[poi@HotSpotAs] >
[poi@HotSpotAs] >
[poi@HotSpotAs] >
[poi@HotSpotAs] > tool profile
action timed out - try again, if error continues contact MikroTik support and send a supout file (13)
[poi@HotSpotAs] >
+1. Good question...Why 6.28rc13 has been removed?
Good question, but bad topic:+1. Good question...Why 6.28rc13 has been removed?
nop, i can't connet...poizzon, did you do what this log line asked?
I get lots of this messages on my setup ... I use capsmanv2 with multiple APs configured to provide same said over a building ... this warning pops up when client goes from one AP to another ... sometimes RSTP disables the port long enough to make CAP drop connection due to timeout and loose all of its clients which is annoying.interface,warning 3_WIFI: bridge port received packet with own address as source address, probably loop
why i got a lot of the warming message?how to fix
my ccr1036-12g-4s and a lot of other hardware buy only one week,,how to got Technical Support?
Just to let you know. This problem was confirmed by mikrotik to be an error finally.Having three mipsbe routers connected to internet:
A: running SSTP server accepting SSTP conections from B and C
B: running SSTP server and client, connecting to A and accepting connections from C
C: running SSTP client and connecting to A and B
A had 6.25, B had 6.18, C had 6.25 and everything worked fine.
Decided to update A from 6.25 to 6.27. Result: Connection from B was fine. C was not able to establish connection.
Decided to update C from 6.25 to 6.27. Result: C is not able to establish connections both to A and B. The disk1 that was working in 6.25 was renamed to disk3 and new disk1 appeared – this should not happen!
And what is more: not running SSTP clients show incoming packets and data in interface overview. How to? Torch is blank…
Reverting both A and C to 6.25 and waiting a correction. After downgrade both A and C to 6.25 everything works correctly like before.
Supout was sent to support, ticket nr. [Ticket#2015021466000104]
To this ticket. I received today info from Mikrotik support that I should have all involved ros devices at the same level (6.27). But the ticket was also about the SSTP not working between two 6.27 devices. So the advice was false.
I found the solution myself: it is the PFS option that is not documented. Correct settings allows communication between both 6.27 as between different versions (for example 6.27-6.18 or 6.27-6.25 in my case).
Mikrotik should take care about the documentation if changing/adding anything!
+1 for this.so when all_packages torrent/zip will be back?
Please contact support@mikrotik.com so we could check the configuration of the board and setup environment. Then we could try to reproduce this problem in the lab with the AC boards.hi,
I have a problem starting nstream to be unusable with ac hardware. I have swapped a RB912 with a netbox5 on a place were nstream was working really good (uptimes of clients ofthen 10-20 days before getting a not polled for too long), now it disconnects ALL clients simultainously every hour or so (not polled for too long).
wireless-fp package
a/n mode
please make nstream working stable again, for most of my sites it gives AT LEAST double tcp performace at the client side than NV2. I'm worried now about using the newest hardware as this is even less usable with nstreme than old hardware.
I can't simply downgrade all my clients to just 50% of the bandwidth just for using another protocol.
thanks
ps.: btw I have around 450 mikrotiks in use here, and I'm doing wisp since 2000
What ports do you have on bridge?interface,warning 3_WIFI: bridge port received packet with own address as source address, probably loop
why i got a lot of the warming message?how to fix
my ccr1036-12g-4s and a lot of other hardware buy only one week,,how to got Technical Support?
An error, which I don't know the meaning of, occasionally appears in the log.
I would be greateful if you could tell me if this error occurs due to a configuration fault or if someone is trying to connect but I am unable to see the IP from which it is coming from.
This started happening after upgrade 6.27, but before the update I didn't see the error.
20:32:31 ipsec,error failed to get valid proposal.
20:32:31 ipsec,error failed to pre-process ph1 packet (side: 1, status 1).
20:32:31 ipsec,error phase1 negotiation failed.
20:32:41 ipsec,error failed to get valid proposal.
20:32:41 ipsec,error failed to pre-process ph1 packet (side: 1, status 1).
20:32:41 ipsec,error phase1 negotiation failed.
20:32:51 ipsec,error failed to get valid proposal.
20:32:51 ipsec,error failed to pre-process ph1 packet (side: 1, status 1).
20:32:51 ipsec,error phase1 negotiation failed.
20:33:01 ipsec,error failed to get valid proposal.
20:33:01 ipsec,error failed to pre-process ph1 packet (side: 1, status 1).
20:33:01 ipsec,error phase1 negotiation failed.
20:33:05 ipsec,error phase1 negotiation failed due to time up X.X.X.X[500]<=>Z.Z.Z.Z[500] 5654bdb3a0805b43:00000000000000
20:33:05 ipsec,error failed to get valid proposal.
20:33:05 ipsec,error failed to pre-process ph1 packet (side: 1, status 1).
20:33:05 ipsec,error phase1 negotiation failed.
Do you have any SNAT on the network path from SSTP client to SSTP server which is configured out of SSTP client?Just to let you know. This problem was confirmed by mikrotik to be an error finally.
After my further investigation, it is not linked to PFS nor to ros versions mismatch nor to SSTP only, as it also happens to L2TP. The basic of the problem lies in the dynamically assigned IP to the client device that suddenly becomes ivalid without any obvious reason at the clients ip address list.
For those who suffer by this problem like me, you can switch off the sstp/l2tp client, remove the invalid addresses from address lists, reboot the client and switch on the sstp/l2tp client. Then it should behave good at least for some time...
I have got a message that it was passed to programmers for correction. Hope it will be included in 6.28.
Hey, can we please have the .torrent files back for ALL RouterOS. I don't believe that I am the only one that uses the .torrent to download RouterOS. I myself support multiple different hardware flavors and to download each file separately can be a pain.
Thanks!
Hey, can we please have the .torrent files back for ALL RouterOS. I don't believe that I am the only one that uses the .torrent to download RouterOS. I myself support multiple different hardware flavors and to download each file separately can be a pain.
Thanks!
Not only are you! Mikrotik: please come back torrent download!
I did copying the .npk file as always, I have no way to do netinstall from remote location where I am some 500km from the device.Steen, did you try Netinstall or just copying .npk files?
For me, 6.27 is a good release. I have it running on couple of routerboards and on those never had kernel panics, sudden reboots or resets. Everything that i have set on earlier releases (5.x) working like a charm. Big plus from me!
And the reason is in Log, isn't it?I had cases where i copy .npk files and then after reboot, device simply wont upgrade
If you can netinstall the router I would do that. If not, you might try upgrading to 6.25 and then go to 6.27.Hello Folks!
Trying to upgrade CCR1016 from 6.24 to 6.27 failed due to kernel panic, and it reverted back to 6.24 again and support was generated. I put up a support case to MT with support file.
Anyone who have seen this and or know how to mitigate it ?
Try -please help me, someone can tell me where I find the download version 6.27 parael npk ccr1036-12G -4S