A-1km-B-14km-C-34km-D

A-have no image

This is on point B 2x2 Panels 2x2 UB5
Dual Polarization Dish B-->C

This is on Point C 2x2 Dual Polarization Dish

Antenna with dual converter From The Ground Inside the Box 4xXR5 Intel 2400Mhz - If u want call me crazy Point D and point A have no image.....

Back To the test
10.10.1.5 Point D
10.10.1.1 Point A
TCP UDP
On heavy traffic link is about 90-95 Mbit
I really want to know if I implement N can get more speed ?
On forum I can see n can go up to 80mbit TCP 200Mbit UDP
Mt 4 is still beta hmm.. Mt 4.x is Mt 3.x+n but still beta
have anyone tested N with dual Dual polarized antenna?
I want to rid off from pc's but I can't find any RB with a lot of Horse Power that can Handle 4xXR5.

anyway MT is super extra OS ))

perfect work ...

high light link

Look's really nice...
Can you try and post your ping times?

A->B
B->C
C->D
A->D

And was the bandwidth test from D->A?

Yes I also think the link was perfect but I run in some problems with interference between wlan's
When TCP traffic From D->A was about 100-105 or when the traffic was about Rx50Mbit/Tx15Mbit On Point B and C TX/RX Rate will fall to Tx54Mbit/RX18Mbit or TX48/RX12M or 48/6 etc.... - than the throughput from A->D was disaster (2-4%Packed lost). Sometimes Ping just jump from 3-5 to 30-40 (than throughput was 40Mbit ) Than I have to disable/enable wlan's , change channel (10Mhz up/down) All problems were between Point B and C - 4xWlans on B/C

This week I made some changes
On point B have 2xUB5 2XR5 - change with 4xUB5
On point C have 4xXR5 - change with 2xUB5 2xXR5
Point A - 2xUB5
Point D - 2xXR5
A(2xUB5)-1km-B(4xUB5)-14km-C(2xUB5,2xXR5)-34km-D(2xXR5)
New TCP Test A->D I have a lower data rate but the link is much more stable (2 days with no problems)
Now problem is between Point B<->C like I said I change 4xXR5 (600mW) with 4xUB5(200mW)
signals were -57/-60 now with UB5 signals are -65/-67 Tx/Rx rate is 36mbit/36Mbit--48mbit/36mbit so the throughput is
B<-90 up to 95Mbit->C
I think I can fix it with bigger dishes I hope I'll get better signals like -60 and >105mbit but 90mbit is fine for now.

QpoX This is TCP test from A->D
A-10.10.1.1
B-10.10.1.3
C-10.10.1.4
D-10.10.1.5
Point D Point C Point B I hope this is what u looking for..

can you post a drawing of the lmbs on your dishes with the dimentions on so i can see how close my lmbs are

as i have had no luck with dual lmbs



thansk for the help

As u can see up on the post on Neta-Dish lmbs are about 0.65-0.75m from the dish
On the biggest dish on point C lmb-horn is about 0.4-0.5m But I m not sure I'll make new pic. I'll post them tomorrow
I use this limbs - @irLAN 5000 - DP (one is 130$+shipping)
http://videomaxavs.com/en/store/Scripts ... uct=188897

Also I m wondering if RB600 is powerful as they say to handle 2xbonding 4xnstreem and >100mbit TCP traffic???

Good morning lakis, me you can pass the configuration of bonding so that I am forming one with eoiptunnel:
2 RB532A
4 XR5
2 dual Antenna polarization

and duplex gives to a bandwidth of 15MB full me.

Can you post antenna gain and TX Power used in longest link?
Can you post link path profile?

Inside the Box 4xXR5 Intel 2400Mhz - If u want call me crazy

Are you sure? You have an AMD cpu

antoniogc I dont use eoiptunnel just ApBridge - Station wds, form bonding and put slaves
with eoiptunnel I think u cant use nstreme with no nstreme u cant get 120mbit TCP
magnavox yes its Intel 2400Mhz Mb Asrock Prescott 82801 Intel chipset
Last link is the longest 34km
On 3 Point dish is about 1.2-1.3m (not shure dish is old never measured) @irLAN 5000 - DP lmb (should be 32db)
On the last point dish is (Like pick.. up on the post Neta-Dish) 90sm (should be 28-29db)
Tx-Power XR5 (should be 600mw )- Tx Power is on default

Tx-Power XR5 (should be 600mw )- Tx Power is on default

I don't know defaulkt value for XR5. Can you check it and report here?

magnavox yes its Intel 2400Mhz Mb Asrock Prescott 82801 Intel chipset

Strange... RouterOS show AMD in your resource TAB

hoho yes there it is
there are 4 pc's 2 AMD 2 Intel (what does it meter I use what I can find)

and Default tx Power for XR5

hoho yes there it is
there are 4 pc's 2 AMD 2 Intel (what does it meter I use what I can find)

and Default tx Power for XR5

defaultp.JPG

That's strange, mine XR looks like this:
Does it have something to do with country and 'frequency mode' settings ?

Good good!

Can you detail your config?

How have you configured WLANs on Bridge and Bonding?

hoho yes there it is
there are 4 pc's 2 AMD 2 Intel (what does it meter I use what I can find)

and Default tx Power for XR5

defaultp.JPG

That's strange, mine XR looks like this:

Clipboard02.png

Does it have something to do with country and 'frequency mode' settings ?

SR5 or XR5?

good morning, I use apbridge-station, with two eoiptunnel and bounding balance rr. The antennas are double polarization of 32dbi.

I follow this instruction
http://forum.mikrotik.com/viewtopic.php ... ghput+best

---------------
KimC:
Add a bridge to each router
Add ether1 to the bridge on each router
Add one ip (i.e. 192.168.10.71/24) to bridge1 on R1 and one ip (i.e. 192.168.10.72/24) to bridge1 on R2
R1: wlan1 and wlan2 in bridge mode, 5ghzTurbo, good channel separation, dynamic WDS, no default WDS bridge
R2: wlan1 and wlan2 in bridge mode, 5ghzTurbo, good channel separation, dynamic WDS, no default WDS bridge
Remember to set wlan1 on R1 on same ssid/freq as wlan1 on R2
Remember to set wlan2 on R1 on same ssid/freq as wlan2 on R2

Again on each router, add a bonding interface (balance rr), and add the two static wds interfaces to it as slaves. Add arp-link monitoring on each with the opposite ip
Finally, add the bonding interface to the bridge on each router and check connectivity. Everything should be fine - we now have a bonded wds-link in transparent bridge mode!
------------------
Just wlan1 in Ap bridge wlan2 in station wds ....
+ add Nstreme

antoniogc what is the benefit of using eoiptunnel?

taduikis sry u are right
I have 4xwlan in pc 2xXR5 2xUB5
I made wrong copy paste pic..... lol

This is default XR5 This is UB5

Well yeah, but this get me confused even more, unless someone can jump in here and explain the difference between the tx power values those inside and outside the brackets.. As far as I can see they are 'reversed' here for XR5 and UB5: the true max tx-pwr of XR5 are outside the brackets and for UB5 - inside. Does this have something to do with AP/Station mode?

And as for quad XR5 setup, why don't you consider RB600 with RB604 daughterboard? I'm currently running 6 interfaces in it and it works perfectly.. And wifi nic's are: 2 x XR5, 1 x R5H, 3 x R52H.. I'm using directly connected 20V/3.25A 65W laptop power supply. No power issues whatsoever, I believe it should also work with four XR5s.

Well, it's been almost a year since I wanted to make this setup working. I tried it before with no success. Left the link working in single radio turbo mode, providing me about 50mbps. Today I tried again, got the setup working, but unfortunately, I cannot get satisfying results. Everything works even better if I disable one radio (out of two), I can then get almost 3 times higher thoroughput. With both wlan's enabled - link is worse.

Does anybody have any experience in such situation?

My setup is as follows: two points, each with RB433AH and 2xR5H. Wireless links are up and successfuly running in 5GHz turbo mode, using bridge (on one side) and station-wds (on another), signals are -38 - -48, CCQs are practically 100/100, nstreme enabled. The bonding setup is identical to yours.

So long story short: both interfaces configured in turbo mode perform better in alone than when bonded. Same story if I disable one of the wireless interfaces when bonded. Pings are not so pretty either when bonded.