Good day!

I need to used this card R5SHPn with rb433 and sector ubnt 120' any one try this card with sector
I need good traffic and good ping

Do you have a question with this post ? I see no problem to achieve what you describe. Good luck!

Dear
I not try with this material I ask if some one try it ؟؟؟؟
I ask about performance

R5SHPn is a very specific equipment.
It has only one chain and very high power.
One chain limits rate to a 150Mbps and high power can be superfluous for the short-range CPE.
As a result: R5SHpn isn't best choice for creation of WiFi sector.
Try R52nM or R52Hn if you need more power.

I think R5HSPN is a very good choice, in my case, I had pannel with vertical polarization only, then I just repace old r52 and imediaty my wireless network was converted to MINO one chain, the only problems was that in rb433 does not possible install 3 units, to install two units due invest heatsink, and power up with 2 amps the RB433, the perfomance is 4 times using R52.
Using UBNT pannel you waste money, for this you can try with SR715, or R52Hn.

best regars

ARIEL

Good day!

I need to used this card R5SHPn with rb433 and sector ubnt 120' any one try this card with sector
I need good traffic and good ping

u can do that, but u only can work under the 11a with 20Mhz channel width...

I have just installed 2 R5SHPn cards to upgrade 2 long range p2p links (23km each).
One link showed great increase in performance and ccq due to the extra db but on the second link I saw degradation. I normally see tx of -79 and rx of -76. (card on the other side is a R52Hn).

My first thought was that the card on the other side is going "deaf". So I replaced the R5SHPn with a R52Hn and signal strength fluctuates around -76 on both rt/tx.

So I really cant understand this, cause it seems that this particular has a weaker voice than a R52Hn.


and for some extra information of the problematic card:
mac: 00:0C:42:6F:AB:E2
Chip Info mac:0x80/0x2, phy:0xd0, a5:0xc0, a2:0x0, eeprom:0x0