Community discussions

MikroTik App
 
User avatar
samsoft08
Long time Member
Long time Member
Topic Author
Posts: 613
Joined: Sat Nov 26, 2005 10:52 pm

Large WISP network design ..

Tue Jan 15, 2008 12:42 am

I have a plan to a very big WISP , its for a big city , some millions of population , 1000's of clients , I should install 10's of towers , but i have many options of what would be the network design ..
the prefered design is to make a centeral everything ; hotspot , radius , billing server , etc .. in the centeral location all these servers connected to the main tower which has the points of backhaul , other towers will be connected to this tower , it will be a tree of towers ..
is it a good idea to make it central network ? the user may connect to a tower is far by >15km from the centeral tower , he will connect to a tower which may the tower number 4 or 5 after the centeral ..
all nodes on towers are only bridges , no firewall , just passing the traffic ..
is there better idea ? any modification to this idea ? suggestions ?
 
ste
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Posts: 1924
Joined: Sun Feb 13, 2005 11:21 pm

Re: Large WISP network design ..

Tue Jan 15, 2008 8:02 am

I would build a routed ring topology with 2 exitpoints
and avoid single points of failure.

Stefan
 
User avatar
j2sw
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 131
Joined: Mon Sep 04, 2006 5:42 am
Location: Indiana
Contact:

Re: Large WISP network design ..

Tue Jan 15, 2008 4:35 pm

My thoughts:
-Route as many locations as possible. This will make your backhauls much more efficient.
-Use /29 or similiar small subnets for the backhauls. This will help with broadcast traffic.
-Have redundant links into each POP as you can. You can take advantage of OSPF. In essence you have two rings around your network. Not always practical, but where you can it's worth it.

Why no firewall? Traffic shaping and priority can make a healthy network.

Justin
 
User avatar
jp
Long time Member
Long time Member
Posts: 609
Joined: Wed Mar 02, 2005 5:06 am
Location: Maine
Contact:

Re: Large WISP network design ..

Tue Jan 15, 2008 5:01 pm

Something that big, it is impossible to have the reliable hardware to centralize hotspot. As others have said, route traffic to the towers. Thousands of users on a bridged network is real close to disaster and you'd be lucky if it worked. You'd probably want a subnet per AP. You probably want commercial ISP specific radio equipment (Alvarion, Canopy, Trango, and others..) Otherwise you will spend all your time tinkering or tending to a small number of customers instead of hooking more up.
 
User avatar
samsoft08
Long time Member
Long time Member
Topic Author
Posts: 613
Joined: Sat Nov 26, 2005 10:52 pm

Re: Large WISP network design ..

Tue Jan 15, 2008 10:01 pm

good replys thank to all , as a conclusion from wht has been said , a central hotspot is a bad idea if using mikrotik !!!
 
User avatar
j2sw
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 131
Joined: Mon Sep 04, 2006 5:42 am
Location: Indiana
Contact:

Re: Large WISP network design ..

Tue Jan 15, 2008 10:13 pm

an all bridged network is also bad, especially once you get above a couple of hundred customers. Central point of failure is bad too.
 
El-Emin
newbie
Posts: 47
Joined: Fri Jun 08, 2007 3:47 pm

Re: Large WISP network design ..

Tue Jan 15, 2008 10:48 pm

Hi everyone.
Thanks for very good answers. Last few weeks I am braking my brain how to design make the best toplogy. One of my ideas was to make somethink like samsoft08 said: make all bridge MT-s with one central point where users will authenticate. And now that ideas is definitly off my topic.

Now I wonder, will radius work good with all that routet network because every user will authenticate at his access point and every router will have same ip of radius server?

Regards
 
User avatar
samsoft08
Long time Member
Long time Member
Topic Author
Posts: 613
Joined: Sat Nov 26, 2005 10:52 pm

Re: Large WISP network design ..

Wed Jan 16, 2008 2:09 am

is the only disadvantage of bridged network is that we depend on a single central point , when it failed all network failed ?
or there are other disadvantages ?
ok , lets say we just bridge the nodes AP , installing at every node a x86-RouterOs which will work as a hotspot , cache server and firewall for this node ,but this hotspot must authinticate the users (connected to this node) through the central radius/billing server ..
so , each node will be like this :
from central (or another node ) =====AP client ----- x86-RouterOs------AP===users
how is this ?
regarding that we are talking about > 2000 online users !!!!
 
User avatar
omega-00
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Posts: 1167
Joined: Sat Jun 06, 2009 4:54 am
Location: Australia
Contact:

Re: Large WISP network design ..

Wed Jan 16, 2008 6:36 am

If you're going >2000 clients then a backup/secondary radius server is a good idea also.

Why not do some internal bgp to 2 central points both with links back to your datacentre/office where the radius+database server are located.
That way you aren't relying on a single link to your servers, nor relying on a single server.
 
EgyCom
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 123
Joined: Thu May 31, 2007 9:47 pm

Re: Large WISP network design ..

Wed Jan 16, 2008 12:19 pm

there is presentation on this topic in last MUM (Egypt MUM)
i think it will be very helpful
here is PDF link http://mum.mikrotik.com/presentations/E ... leeman.pdf
and this is video version http://www.tiktube.com/2007/11/30/mum-e ... isp-in-de/
 
User avatar
samsoft08
Long time Member
Long time Member
Topic Author
Posts: 613
Joined: Sat Nov 26, 2005 10:52 pm

Re: Large WISP network design ..

Sun Jan 20, 2008 12:41 am

from your replys , i found that is the most important isuue for you is the redundancy ..ok i agree ..
about EOIP as I read , its less than wds in speed , so thats mean i'll loose more throughput when my network will be large with many nodes ..
how can I route the backhaul ? i need to use centeral hotspot server , is it possible ?
wht about if i use a hotspot server at each node ? can all these servers get authontication by the centeral radius server ?
 
User avatar
omega-00
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Posts: 1167
Joined: Sat Jun 06, 2009 4:54 am
Location: Australia
Contact:

Re: Large WISP network design ..

Tue Jan 22, 2008 5:06 pm

so long as the hotspots have their correct routes or routing setup (be it static or dynamic via ospf, bgp or mme) then they'll be able to find the central server (and provided you've set it up correctly) authenticate against it.

whether you then put public or private ranges behind each hotspot device is up to you.

If I were you I wouldn't even attempt to use EOIP or WDS on the links (apart from at an actuall location) all links that make up your backbone network should be bridged or point to mutipoint connections. If the backhaul points aren't moving then theres no reason WDS would be any better. If you're using WDS on the client side then that would help them move around as needed.
 
bergynator
just joined
Posts: 3
Joined: Wed Jul 30, 2014 12:00 am

Re: Large WISP network design ..

Wed Oct 28, 2015 10:03 pm

there is presentation on this topic in last MUM (Egypt MUM)
i think it will be very helpful
here is PDF link http://mum.mikrotik.com/presentations/E ... leeman.pdf
and this is video version http://www.tiktube.com/2007/11/30/mum-e ... isp-in-de/

I'm very interested in this video but it's online anymore. Anyone have another link please???
 
User avatar
chechito
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Posts: 2990
Joined: Sun Aug 24, 2014 3:14 am
Location: Bogota Colombia
Contact:

Re: Large WISP network design ..

Thu Oct 29, 2015 2:22 am

good replys thank to all , as a conclusion from wht has been said , a central hotspot is a bad idea if using mikrotik !!!

central point of failure its bad idea with any vendor

distributed models are scalable and more economical the only centralized resource will be the radius for authentication (redundant of course)
 
User avatar
chechito
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Posts: 2990
Joined: Sun Aug 24, 2014 3:14 am
Location: Bogota Colombia
Contact:

Re: Large WISP network design ..

Thu Oct 29, 2015 2:25 am

is the only disadvantage of bridged network is that we depend on a single central point , when it failed all network failed ?
or there are other disadvantages ?
ok , lets say we just bridge the nodes AP , installing at every node a x86-RouterOs which will work as a hotspot , cache server and firewall for this node ,but this hotspot must authinticate the users (connected to this node) through the central radius/billing server ..
so , each node will be like this :
from central (or another node ) =====AP client ----- x86-RouterOs------AP===users
how is this ?
regarding that we are talking about > 2000 online users !!!!

bridging is layer 2, routing is layer 3

layer2 troubleshooting its harder than layer 3
 
User avatar
chechito
Forum Guru
Forum Guru
Posts: 2990
Joined: Sun Aug 24, 2014 3:14 am
Location: Bogota Colombia
Contact:

Re: Large WISP network design ..

Thu Oct 29, 2015 2:26 am

there is presentation on this topic in last MUM (Egypt MUM)
i think it will be very helpful
here is PDF link http://mum.mikrotik.com/presentations/E ... leeman.pdf
and this is video version http://www.tiktube.com/2007/11/30/mum-e ... isp-in-de/

I'm very interested in this video but it's online anymore. Anyone have another link please???
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCwFW0Z ... AYN_zVxQ-Q

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: CGGXANNX, jamesperks, tjr and 80 guests