Community discussions

MikroTik App
 
ropebih
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Topic Author
Posts: 113
Joined: Tue May 22, 2007 5:35 pm

Dual xeon or P4 for PPPoE concetrator?

Thu Nov 20, 2008 8:09 pm

Hi all, I have a question.
I have athlon3200+ (2,2GHz) which is CORE router on which is PPPoE concetrator and right now there's constantly around 500 active PPPoE connections(25 Mbit). Processor goes up to 80-90% and I think it's time for me to buy new machine for that. I hesitate between p4 3,2 GHz and poweredge 2650 2x xeon 2,8 GHz. Which one can someone recommend? I have my doubts on this one with 2 processors since I saw in some posts that mikrotik OS is not very stabile with dual processor machine.
 
thadem
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Posts: 115
Joined: Fri Apr 18, 2008 1:40 am

Re: Dual xeon or P4 for PPPoE concetrator?

Fri Nov 21, 2008 1:33 am

don't think too much about the processor speed, both are enough for 500 pppoe-connections.
but if the p4 3ghz is a self built one take the poweredge, its built for lasting and not only for speed, the board has better capacitors than any soho-mainboard and so on.
if the p4 3ghz is not selfbuilt and has good hardware in it, take it, as it is maybe cheaper.
 
ropebih
Member Candidate
Member Candidate
Topic Author
Posts: 113
Joined: Tue May 22, 2007 5:35 pm

Re: Dual xeon or P4 for PPPoE concetrator?

Fri Nov 21, 2008 5:39 am

hi, i don't need cheaper machine, I need beter!
now it is 500 PPPoE connections but in a few months it will be 1000 or 2000..., so I need hardware for it. Thanks
 
User avatar
normis
MikroTik Support
MikroTik Support
Posts: 26436
Joined: Fri May 28, 2004 11:04 am
Location: Riga, Latvia

Re: Dual xeon or P4 for PPPoE concetrator?

Fri Nov 21, 2008 9:56 am

We tested a Intel Q9550 Quad Core PC and the performance was just astonishing by just using a single core. Get that one or something newer :)
 
iam8up
Member
Member
Posts: 333
Joined: Sun Oct 28, 2007 10:58 pm
Location: Troy, OH
Contact:

Re: Dual xeon or P4 for PPPoE concetrator?

Sat Nov 22, 2008 8:50 am

We tested a Intel Q9550 Quad Core PC and the performance was just astonishing by just using a single core. Get that one or something newer :)
What version of RouterOS?
 
User avatar
gustkiller
Member
Member
Posts: 419
Joined: Sat Jan 07, 2006 5:15 am
Location: Brazil
Contact:

Re: Dual xeon or P4 for PPPoE concetrator?

Sat Nov 22, 2008 11:26 pm

Hi!

I recommend for you using intel core platforme and more than one core the version 3.7 , its working here with all 4 cores enabled as a pppoe concentrator and working perfectly :). Here a /sys resou pri.. never crashed or needed to reboot. and with avarege of 500 simultaneous connections.
[admin@PPPOE_SERVER] > sys resou pri
uptime: 15w3d1h32m47s
version: "3.7"
free-memory: 1621112kB
total-memory: 1945852kB
cpu: "Intel(R)"
cpu-count: 4
cpu-frequency: 2400MHz
cpu-load: 4
free-hdd-space: 76729516kB
total-hdd-space: 76904380kB
write-sect-since-reboot: 198767298
write-sect-total: 198767298
 
User avatar
normis
MikroTik Support
MikroTik Support
Posts: 26436
Joined: Fri May 28, 2004 11:04 am
Location: Riga, Latvia

Re: Dual xeon or P4 for PPPoE concetrator?

Mon Nov 24, 2008 9:04 am

version 3.xx
 
cartes
newbie
Posts: 41
Joined: Fri Oct 12, 2007 12:23 am

Re: Dual xeon or P4 for PPPoE concetrator?

Tue Nov 25, 2008 8:24 am

Thank you normis for your answer.

We have an MT router (Core 2 Quad 2.33 GHz and 2 GB RAM) running as BW Manager, and also doing NAT using http://wiki.mikrotik.com/wiki/Load_Balancing_Persistent as a guideline to src-nat our home users of over 4,000 to 250+ real IPs. Our total backbone is 70 Mbps and users' BW is managed using PCQ. We are having the same problems as others have reported about 3.15 becoming unstable after a while. In our case, it happens every 3 - 4 hours. We went back to 3.7 and it's working properly again, except that, occassionally some (around 5 - 10) customers would not be able to "ping" anything that goes through our router.

Since you've had luck in running 3.15 in your lab running on 1 core, would you suggest us to do it? Do you think the MT can take the load using only 1 processor core?

Regards
HASSAN

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: fje, Google [Bot], ivicask and 51 guests