Hi mmigoro , MTK have noted that certain SFP+ routers are backwards compatible with SFP but requires it to be hard set on both sides to 1GB iirc.Does anybody know if SFP+ port supports also SFP modules (1,25gbps).
I would like to replace actual config (RB1100AHx2 + 2 gigabit media converters) with 1 CCR1009-8G-1S-1S+ and 2 SFP modules.
You are paying for the link right? Just ask them to set it to the specified settings and they should?Thanks for info.
I only have access to my side of the link, the other ends are at provider PoP's. So I guess I'm stuck with 1100AHx2...
If you're currently using 1100AHx2 with fiber-to-copper media converter, why not use that with the CCR1009 too ?I only have access to my side of the link, the other ends are at provider PoP's. So I guess I'm stuck with 1100AHx2...
Perhaps this answer from @janisk will matching best this question.Does anybody know if SFP+ port supports also SFP modules (1,25gbps).
I would like to replace actual config (RB1100AHx2 + 2 gigabit media converters) with 1 CCR1009-8G-1S-1S+ and 2 SFP modules.
Monitoring of PSU has already been implemented?starting from RouterOS 6.13 PSU monitoring will be possible. Due to some technical difficulties this feature was delayed. Same will be true for CCR1016-12S-1S+
/system healt print
fan-mode: auto
use-fan: main
active-fan: main
cpu-overtemp-check: yes
cpu-overtemp-threshold: 100C
cpu-overtemp-startup-delay: 1m
voltage: 23.7V
current: 763mA
fan-speed: 5081RPM
temperature: 36C
cpu-temperature: 54C
power-consumption: 18.1W
psu1-state: ok
psu2-state: ok
Have you tried to upgrade the CCR1009 to the newest version and see what that does?I just got my first Mikrotik (CCR1009-8G-1S-1S+). Have some previous experience with a cheaper device.
First issue, the Quicket menu via WebFig doesn't show any settings, all fields are empty. When I login via winbox, the quickset shows me the current configuration.
Second issue, the quickset menu in WebFig is showing Wireless settings although the wireless package is disabled.
Yes I believe that is correct! Nice drawing too, but, euhm, Mikrotik released their block diagram a while ago : http://i.mt.lv/routerboard/files/CCR100 ... 151432.pdf maybe you missed it.Is this how the architecture looks?
Combining the various datasheets this is what I have come up with.
MT could you please confirm?
Hi all,Related to the fans inside I found this one here, perhaps you would take a short overview
if this can be interesting for you. Noiseblocker BlackSilent Pro Fan PM2
Thanks for sharing this! i ordered two of them. Did they fit perfectly or do you have to made some changes to the case?Hi all,Related to the fans inside I found this one here, perhaps you would take a short overview
if this can be interesting for you. Noiseblocker BlackSilent Pro Fan PM2
I justed registered to let you know, that I've installed these fans today. They seem to work perfectly - I don't see any differences in temperature and I don't hear a thing
Thanks for all the information you guys provided in this thread, helped a lot!
They fit perfectly. No changes to the case or fans necessary. The package contains a gasket for vibration-free mounting - I didn't try to install them.Thanks for sharing this! i ordered two of them. Did they fit perfectly or do you have to made some changes to the case?
Do you have Mangle rules? Queues? What are you firewall rules?Hi, can I ask - I have CCR1009 as edge router with NAT.
I used Eth5 as WAN and Eth6 as LAN. But in high data load from customers - above 300Mbps, occurs high cpu usage of CCR up to 100% and traffic decerase to forexample 110Mbps and latency to internet is 100ms and higher. This is during 3-6s, then CPU goues back to 20%. And for a minute -two that repeats. Is my device bad or that config is wrong?
Thanks.
Simple Q cca 30x, firewall cca 70x, NaT 240xDo you have Mangle rules? Queues? What are you firewall rules?Hi, can I ask - I have CCR1009 as edge router with NAT.
I used Eth5 as WAN and Eth6 as LAN. But in high data load from customers - above 300Mbps, occurs high cpu usage of CCR up to 100% and traffic decerase to forexample 110Mbps and latency to internet is 100ms and higher. This is during 3-6s, then CPU goues back to 20%. And for a minute -two that repeats. Is my device bad or that config is wrong?
Thanks.
Could be as simple as the order of your rules.Simple Q cca 30x, firewall cca 70x, NaT 240x
Post your filter and mangle, when we can see what could be causing it.Previous PC router goes permanently on 70% on CPU load (dual-core 2200MHz Pentium. And it has lower latency to internet and no such issue, during 4 years.
I agree 100% with Normis, these products are ISP grade products.the CCR1009 has the power to run a medium sized ISP, so, I don't agree to the above.at max it is small office and Home-office (where noise is big problem
My main office is 500/500 fiber, feeding three bunch offices each with 100/100 fiber. Each office has a CCR1009 with 2GB. They have no issue sustaining 95~100mbps throughput, saturating the branch fiber. The main office routinely sustains 300mbps out to the offices.I am not sure they are small business grade in the VPN area, with users frequently referring to slower performance compared to RB1100AH.
With what VPN configuration?My main office is 500/500 fiber, feeding three bunch offices each with 100/100 fiber. Each office has a CCR1009 with 2GB. They have no issue sustaining 95~100mbps throughput, saturating the branch fiber. The main office routinely sustains 300mbps out to the offices.I am not sure they are small business grade in the VPN area, with users frequently referring to slower performance compared to RB1100AH.
Well they are saying that it can handle a "lot more than 500Mbps" with the correct VPN config:I am not sure they are small business grade in the VPN area, with users frequently referring to slower performance compared to RB1100AH.
MikroTik can confirm or deny this, but I believe the CCRs use the same IPSEC hardware chip which means the CCR1009 performance ought to be close to the other CCRs.Well they are saying that it can handle a "lot more than 500Mbps" with the correct VPN config:I am not sure they are small business grade in the VPN area, with users frequently referring to slower performance compared to RB1100AH.
http://forum.mikrotik.com/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=87892
according ezchip website the MiCA™ acceleration engines responsible for crypto acceleration have the following theoretical performance:MikroTik can confirm or deny this, but I believe the CCRs use the same IPSEC hardware chip which means the CCR1009 performance ought to be close to the other CCRs.Well they are saying that it can handle a "lot more than 500Mbps" with the correct VPN config:I am not sure they are small business grade in the VPN area, with users frequently referring to slower performance compared to RB1100AH.
http://forum.mikrotik.com/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=87892
We were able to get a max of 7.5 Gbps of encrypted throughput using EoIP over IPSEC in our testing of the CCR1036s.
http://www.stubarea51.net/2015/10/16/10 ... ip-tunnel/
Very helpful info! I've looked several times but never saw which chip was being used for IPSEC offload on the CCR. Just out of curiosity, where did you find the info on what chip is in the CCRs?according ezchip website the MiCA™ acceleration engines responsible for crypto acceleration have the following theoretical performance:
tilegx9 (ccr1009) 10Gbps of crypto and 5Gbps of compression
tilegx16 (ccr1016) 20Gbps of crypto and 10Gbps of compression
tilegx36 (ccr1036) 40Gbps of crypto and 20Gbps of compression
tilegx72 (ccr1072) 40Gbps of crypto and 20Gbps of compression
off course we have to take in count cpu and memory performance and the complexity of configuration
this are the chip manufacturer linksVery helpful info! I've looked several times but never saw which chip was being used for IPSEC offload on the CCR. Just out of curiosity, where did you find the info on what chip is in the CCRs?according ezchip website the MiCA™ acceleration engines responsible for crypto acceleration have the following theoretical performance:
tilegx9 (ccr1009) 10Gbps of crypto and 5Gbps of compression
tilegx16 (ccr1016) 20Gbps of crypto and 10Gbps of compression
tilegx36 (ccr1036) 40Gbps of crypto and 20Gbps of compression
tilegx72 (ccr1072) 40Gbps of crypto and 20Gbps of compression
off course we have to take in count cpu and memory performance and the complexity of configuration
Funny story, since purchasing the CCR1009 I've only used it as a testing router and temporary router where I needed it. Today I ported my configuration from the RB2011 I was using to my CCR1009 and am using it as my home "production" router!
I did set the CPU down to 600Mhz which has made it so that the stock fans just turn off. Performance is still miles and leagues ahead of the RB2011.
The reason for the switching the routers? I've started using a PPTP VPN tunnel to redirect some traffic to another site and anything more then 40Mbit would cause the RB2011 CPU to hit max CPU load and it became noticeable with other stuff I was running through it. With the CCR1009, even using 600Mhz, no problems whatsoever and I've seen it hit 60MBit to 80Mbit without problem!
Awesome device!
See for yourself. This was downloading about 16GB of data, I saw peaks up to 110Mbit but average was more around 60MBit. I have included a bandwith graph and 2 CPU graphs. One is of each CPU individually, one of them averaged together.what cpu usage when hitting 80mbit of pptp?? in tool profile you see cores evenly charged??