I've several 133Cs and I won't let any v.3 OS anywhere near any of them yet. In my experience they just can't cope with it.we need some other user with rb133c and ros 3.11 installed to verify if also in his routerboard logs,
I've several 133Cs and I won't let any v.3 OS anywhere near any of them yet. In my experience they just can't cope with it.we need some other user with rb133c and ros 3.11 installed to verify if also in his routerboard logs,
Cheque-book still out and pen still poised....Cheque-book out and pen poised...
I'd vote for that.by default to take time from router and when different timezone is necessary, then configure it with timezone option.
I can't speak for levis but I've just spend four hours downgrading a 112 from 3.10 to 2.9.51 because however many problems that version causes it does at least give me a working router again.and WHY do you have to do that? you will have plenty of problems using an old version.
Doh!Write '/dude' after the ip adress/hostname in browser
Yes. Both ends are 532s. The AP is running OS 2.9.49. Firmware is 2.11. The station is running OS 2.9.51, Firmware 2.12.Does all your MikroTik stuff have Routerboard package enabled in the packages list?
If the device is an RB333 you won't be the first with this problem.addendum: this board doesn't do this all the time, it will boot properly perhaps 1 out of 10 times on applied power.
Or in my case adding an extra one, giving all the customers 1GB instead of 100MB!Is there any way to add the transfer limit in anything but bytes?
I have made several mistakes by omitting a '0',
Haven't seen them. Not sure I'd be enthusiastic about a manufacturer that sticks a paper label on a heat-sink as a matter of course.
I'm guessing too that a proxy would get around the TTL problem, as it initiates a new request.Another option, set up a proxy,
I have the space but as the links are limited by the DSL's speed anyway (6.5MBps down and 750kBps up) how relevant is wireless speed?If you have the tower space use two PTP's. You'll get better speeds and more resilience to noise.
That's good news.Documentation is under development. When it's done, we will publish it.
That sounds very impressive. 200km?I established some QSO's at 2m at distance of more than 200 km using one of the forest covered hill as passive reflector. I had about 10 watts TX and small yagi.
Normis I've just downloaded "all_packages-ns-2.9.51.zip". Unzipped it contains packages like "ntp-2.9.51-ns.npk"look at the package names. they correspond to the CPU type.
Thank you Ahmed, you did.Hi ;
I think i told you to create more than security profile to use them with VAP .
with best regards.
Hi Kijomabb,hi,
i suspect if you use PPPOE on each line and let the RB do the client end then apply load balancing via the usual ways at the router.
cheers
OK. Thanks. I'll have to work on the WDS approach.It's the way wireless works.
Ah well. The quick and easy usually can't.Makes sense. Can't be done.
Well?
Would you like me to submit the supout file?
Sorry, sergejs, that's as clear as mud.You have to use the particular link http://router_ip_address/user?=...
instead of http://router_ip_address/user?tony?=....