Appearently there is a memory leak since changelog 6.44beta17 (2018-Oct-04 09:42) states: "*) bridge - fixed possible memory leak when VLAN filtering is used;" I had VLAN filtering turned on... on my hap ac The ones who monitored stable memory usage, did you have VLAN filtering on? 6.42.7 ...

I got mem leak reboot again on 6.42.9. 6.42.7 was fine. Also see "ipsec phase1 negotiation failed due to time up" multiple times right before reboot with "out of memory condition". Anybody else having this issue on hap ac?

As it looks like I have again mem leak reboots on hap ac with RouterOS 6.42.9. Just before reboot IPSEC failure show up in logs. 6.42.7 seemed to be ok, but 6.42.9 is again bad even on bugfix!

My hap ac has still memory leak and crashes even in 6.43.2 not really stable kernel failure in previous boot out of memory condition was detected I also have instabilities with my hap AC, crashing every week, although I wasn't graphing memory usage before so I can't be sure there is a leak on mine....

My hap ac has still memory leak and crashes even in 6.43.2 not really stable

kernel failure in previous boot
out of memory condition was detected

I have slow speed with LTAP mini kit too. It seems to be related to the LTE board, which is the same in wap and ltap kit. MikroTik seems not to be good at LTE and GPS devices yet.

Did you remove the external GPS antenna before changing to internal one? Some people claim once external GPS antenna is attached you can switch to internal or external and it always works, i.e. it always takes external even if displayed internal.

Can anybody from MikroTik confirm that? Release notes?

The device is too big for my purpose with external antenna. I bought it because you (Mikrotik) claimed it supports GPS out of the box with internal antenna initially! My mobile phone has LTE and GPS working both together with no interference. Is this really Mikrotik's support policy? 1) Changing the...

Hello,

why is GPS support still advertised by Mikrotik? Can it be fixed by firmware update? Should the devices be recalled and exchanged? First time disappointed by Mikrotik's QA.....

Thanks for a reply!

This setup works for me to achieve load balancing. How can I additionally have failover? I cannot duplicate dynamic gateway entries provided by dhcp-clients on wan interfaces with different distances, can I?