Community discussions

MikroTik App

Search found 112 matches

by Rfulton
Tue Dec 12, 2023 4:33 pm
Forum: General
Topic: TX drops on CCR-2116
Replies: 4
Views: 2561

Re: TX drops on CCR-2116

same issue here, 13 RS ;;; LivingRoom name="ether11-LivingRoom" driver-rx-byte=724 719 959 657 driver-rx-packet=567 322 636 driver-tx-byte=281 251 050 275 driver-tx-packet=289 718 722 rx-bytes=727 007 009 723 rx-too-short=0 rx-too-long=0 rx-unicast=567 289 029 rx-broadcast=27 213 rx-pause=...
by Rfulton
Sat Nov 04, 2023 5:47 pm
Forum: General
Topic: Out of order Packets
Replies: 1
Views: 531

Re: Out of order Packets

If i hook two computers to the ccr2004 and do an iperf i get literally 5-10 out of order packets in a 10 second iperf test. If i test between the ccr2116 the same method i get the same. If i test from a computer hooked to ccr2116 and iperf to a computer hooked to the ccr2004 i get massive out of ord...
by Rfulton
Sat Nov 04, 2023 3:47 pm
Forum: General
Topic: Out of order Packets
Replies: 1
Views: 531

Out of order Packets

Hello, Doing a few iperf tests through my equipment. I get tons of out of order packets doing iperf from Computer => ccr2116 =>ccr2004 => to another computer if i test Computer => ccr2116 => computer I get no out of order packets if i do Computer =>ccr2004 => computer I get no out of order packets I...
by Rfulton
Wed Aug 16, 2023 4:09 am
Forum: RouterOS beta
Topic: Bridge Vlan with QinQ
Replies: 27
Views: 4655

Re: Bridge Vlan with QinQ

bump
by Rfulton
Tue Aug 01, 2023 6:22 pm
Forum: RouterOS beta
Topic: Bridge Vlan with QinQ
Replies: 27
Views: 4655

Re: Bridge Vlan with QinQ

bump
by Rfulton
Fri Jul 28, 2023 9:59 pm
Forum: RouterOS beta
Topic: Bridge Vlan with QinQ
Replies: 27
Views: 4655

Re: Bridge Vlan with QinQ

Where is Janis? Hes on lunch maybe?
by Rfulton
Fri Jul 28, 2023 8:34 pm
Forum: RouterOS beta
Topic: Bridge Vlan with QinQ
Replies: 27
Views: 4655

Re: Bridge Vlan with QinQ

Right now I'm just pretending eth1 is the provider networking and doing svlan2100 (outer) and cvlan20(inner) and just trying to make that work first.

They are directly connected.
by Rfulton
Fri Jul 28, 2023 7:07 pm
Forum: RouterOS beta
Topic: Bridge Vlan with QinQ
Replies: 27
Views: 4655

Re: Bridge Vlan with QinQ

A computer hooked to either Tik on ethernet2 can reach the default gateway (main-vlan20) and login to winbox
by Rfulton
Fri Jul 28, 2023 6:41 pm
Forum: RouterOS beta
Topic: Bridge Vlan with QinQ
Replies: 27
Views: 4655

Re: Bridge Vlan with QinQ

Mac-telnet and Mac-ping do not work.

Very weird.
by Rfulton
Fri Jul 28, 2023 6:14 pm
Forum: RouterOS beta
Topic: Bridge Vlan with QinQ
Replies: 27
Views: 4655

Re: Bridge Vlan with QinQ

" 21:51:19 and 21:51:46 (time span of 27 seconds) while pcapB.pcap fiel shows times between 22:13:40 and 22:14:18 (time span of 38 seconds)."

NTP is off on the devices since they don't have network connectivity. good find at least.
by Rfulton
Fri Jul 28, 2023 6:00 pm
Forum: RouterOS beta
Topic: Bridge Vlan with QinQ
Replies: 27
Views: 4655

Re: Bridge Vlan with QinQ

I'm still not getting network connectivity though. something is not working as intended i believe.

I can get more pcaps for you, but they were running at the same time perhaps not the same length of time.
by Rfulton
Fri Jul 28, 2023 4:49 pm
Forum: RouterOS beta
Topic: Bridge Vlan with QinQ
Replies: 27
Views: 4655

Re: Bridge Vlan with QinQ

Anyone else want to try and load the config and take a look?

I swear this should work with vlan2100 tagged as 20 in bridge>vlan.

It works when you tag vlan2100-QinQ20 as 20 in bridge>vlan, but this results in a double stack of cvlan.
by Rfulton
Fri Jul 28, 2023 3:43 pm
Forum: RouterOS beta
Topic: Bridge Vlan with QinQ
Replies: 27
Views: 4655

Re: Bridge Vlan with QinQ

These are lined up, check this.
Pcap3.7z
by Rfulton
Fri Jul 28, 2023 3:27 pm
Forum: RouterOS beta
Topic: Bridge Vlan with QinQ
Replies: 27
Views: 4655

Re: Bridge Vlan with QinQ

Here's some more though.
Pcap2.7z
by Rfulton
Fri Jul 28, 2023 3:21 pm
Forum: RouterOS beta
Topic: Bridge Vlan with QinQ
Replies: 27
Views: 4655

Re: Bridge Vlan with QinQ

Look above. I must have uploaded during your reply.
by Rfulton
Fri Jul 28, 2023 3:17 pm
Forum: RouterOS beta
Topic: Bridge Vlan with QinQ
Replies: 27
Views: 4655

Re: Bridge Vlan with QinQ

I made the suggestion again either way to show pcaps and config.
tag20vlan2100.7z
by Rfulton
Fri Jul 28, 2023 2:43 pm
Forum: RouterOS beta
Topic: Bridge Vlan with QinQ
Replies: 27
Views: 4655

Re: Bridge Vlan with QinQ

"I'm pretty sure that if they were both correctly configured (so that they would work with single CVID), then everything would work as well." Wow amazing analysis. Turns out though no other configuration works. Let me clarify for the third time. TAGGED VLAN 20 down VLAN2100-QinQ works Unta...
by Rfulton
Fri Jul 28, 2023 1:49 pm
Forum: RouterOS beta
Topic: Bridge Vlan with QinQ
Replies: 27
Views: 4655

Re: Bridge Vlan with QinQ

Hello,

The provider does require an s-vlan across their network.

Attached is the packet captures when its working.
by Rfulton
Fri Jul 28, 2023 12:28 am
Forum: RouterOS beta
Topic: Bridge Vlan with QinQ
Replies: 27
Views: 4655

Re: Bridge Vlan with QinQ

Let me clarify, I also set pvid to 20 on vlan2100-QinQ20 and set it to untagged in bridge > vlan and the headers are correct but it doesn't work either.

only the tagged vlan2100-QinQ20 works, but gives me svlan 2100, cvlan 20, cvlan 20.
by Rfulton
Thu Jul 27, 2023 11:54 pm
Forum: RouterOS beta
Topic: Bridge Vlan with QinQ
Replies: 27
Views: 4655

Re: Bridge Vlan with QinQ

I did set pvid to 1 on vlan2100-QinQ20 which results in unchanged behavior.

"instead you could use eth1-vlan2100 as bridge port, tagged with VID 20."

I did do this, which gives you the correct headers but doesn't work.

Any ideas?
by Rfulton
Thu Jul 27, 2023 10:45 pm
Forum: RouterOS beta
Topic: Bridge Vlan with QinQ
Replies: 27
Views: 4655

Bridge Vlan with QinQ

Like the subject says. I have one cvlan Vlan20 and one svlan 2100(outer) https://imgur.com/a/DBcuEu8 https://imgur.com/a/DBcuEu8 Vlan 20 gives out 192.168.20.x at both locations (no overlap) The currently uploaded config works, but I'm seeing 1svlan and 2cvlans come across the provider network. If I...
by Rfulton
Wed Mar 29, 2023 2:21 pm
Forum: RouterOS beta
Topic: Wireguard use Hostname in endpoint
Replies: 63
Views: 19869

Re: Wireguard use Hostname in endpoint

Same issue on restart.
Wireguard won't initiate unless disable and re-enable the peer.
by Rfulton
Wed Dec 21, 2022 1:38 pm
Forum: Announcements
Topic: v7.7rc is released!
Replies: 259
Views: 90196

Re: v7.7rc is released!

if you are unhappy you can buy diffrent brand :) hihi
>don't like society? make your own!

Why does society tolerate people like this?
by Rfulton
Tue Nov 08, 2022 7:53 pm
Forum: RouterOS beta
Topic: Cake and Queue Trees
Replies: 3
Views: 5250

Re: Cake and Queue Trees

Running on CCR2004
by Rfulton
Sat Nov 05, 2022 9:53 pm
Forum: RouterOS beta
Topic: Cake and Queue Trees
Replies: 3
Views: 5250

Cake and Queue Trees

I've read about 20 different threads on this subject, some people say you can't use HTB with Cake, some say you can. Some are telling me you can only use Cake as an interface queue with the built in Shaper. I want to know is, Can you use HTB with Cake, if you can, is it even worth it? Does cake work...
by Rfulton
Tue Jun 07, 2022 7:05 pm
Forum: RouterOS beta
Topic: some quick comments on configuring cake
Replies: 285
Views: 103649

Re: some quick comments on configuring cake

I have lost track... can an interface queue also shape inbound?
Seems to be egress only.
by Rfulton
Wed Jun 01, 2022 1:53 pm
Forum: Announcements
Topic: v7.3rc [testing] is released!
Replies: 452
Views: 104086

Re: v7.3rc [testing] is released!

It's clear the developers for Mikrotik and CAKE refuse to communicate, and I can kinda tell who's end it's on.

Reminds me of PFSENSE and wireguard where they both got so mad at each other they made entire blogs telling each other how wrong they were lmao.
by Rfulton
Wed May 18, 2022 2:02 pm
Forum: RouterOS beta
Topic: some quick comments on configuring cake
Replies: 285
Views: 103649

Re: some quick comments on configuring cake

Looks like it's back to TP-Link
by Rfulton
Tue May 17, 2022 4:41 am
Forum: RouterOS beta
Topic: some quick comments on configuring cake
Replies: 285
Views: 103649

Re: some quick comments on configuring cake

Hi! Can somebody take a look at my CAKE config and tell me if there's anything I can do to get as close to line-speed as possible. Some background: Zen VDSL2 connection (80/20) into Vigor 130 modem (VLAN 101); PPPoE connection established via RB4011 on ether1. Jumbo packets enabled (ether1 MTU 1508...
by Rfulton
Sat May 14, 2022 1:42 pm
Forum: RouterOS beta
Topic: some quick comments on configuring cake
Replies: 285
Views: 103649

Re: some quick comments on configuring cake

What are you talking about? It's been working over here just fine?

A developer is me. Things were looking good.
Then maybe you should read the latest patch notes?
by Rfulton
Sat May 14, 2022 1:42 am
Forum: RouterOS beta
Topic: some quick comments on configuring cake
Replies: 285
Views: 103649

Re: some quick comments on configuring cake

!) queue - do not allow using CAKE type in simple and tree setups (already configured queues will be disabled);

Cake confirmed dead for Mikrotik.

I assume Mikrotik has never tried to contact the developer?
by Rfulton
Fri May 13, 2022 7:34 pm
Forum: Announcements
Topic: v7.3rc [testing] is released!
Replies: 452
Views: 104086

Re: v7.3beta [testing] is released!

the cake was a lie all along bros....
by Rfulton
Fri May 13, 2022 6:02 pm
Forum: Announcements
Topic: v7.3rc [testing] is released!
Replies: 452
Views: 104086

Re: v7.3beta [testing] is released!

CAKE type was always meant only for interface queue, it had no effect when used in simple queue.
so my queue trees are worthless? I can only use cake with interface queue? is it always going to be like this?
by Rfulton
Fri May 13, 2022 4:57 pm
Forum: Announcements
Topic: v7.3rc [testing] is released!
Replies: 452
Views: 104086

Re: v7.3beta [testing] is released!

!) queue - do not allow using CAKE type in simple and tree setups (already configured queues will be disabled);

WTFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF
by Rfulton
Tue May 10, 2022 4:48 pm
Forum: RouterOS beta
Topic: Does PIM work AT ALL on 7.1?
Replies: 12
Views: 6680

Re: Does PIM work AT ALL on 7.1?

No, still not working.

Interfaces exist for a couple minutes after bootup but then disappear and cannot bring them back without another reboot.
by Rfulton
Mon May 02, 2022 4:17 pm
Forum: Announcements
Topic: v7.2.2 [stable] and v7.2.3 [stable] are released!
Replies: 401
Views: 81948

Re: v7.2.2 [stable] is released!

PIM-SM still broken.
by Rfulton
Wed Apr 27, 2022 1:42 am
Forum: RouterBOARD hardware
Topic: CRS317-1G-16S+ Multiple SFP not working
Replies: 0
Views: 585

CRS317-1G-16S+ Multiple SFP not working

The on brand Copper 1gb SFP work from mikrotik.
Working.PNG

The Cisco AFP are not working.
not working.PNG

Even if i force non negotiate and set manually it does not receive any packets, only sends.
by Rfulton
Tue Apr 26, 2022 5:38 am
Forum: Announcements
Topic: v7.2.1 [stable] is released!
Replies: 240
Views: 46828

Re: v7.2.1 [stable] is released!

PIM-SM still not working on CCR2004-1G-12S+2XS
by Rfulton
Tue Apr 26, 2022 5:36 am
Forum: RouterOS beta
Topic: PIM-SM not working at all
Replies: 5
Views: 4341

Re: PIM-SM not working at all

Not working still. FBI has been notified.
by Rfulton
Mon Apr 11, 2022 11:38 pm
Forum: Announcements
Topic: v7.2 is released!
Replies: 359
Views: 61825

Re: v7.2 is released!

7.2 on CCR2004-1G-12S+2XS

PIM-SM still does not work.

I will be submitting an FBI tip.
by Rfulton
Sun Feb 27, 2022 2:25 am
Forum: RouterOS beta
Topic: Does PIM work AT ALL on 7.1?
Replies: 12
Views: 6680

Re: Does PIM work AT ALL on 7.1?

Maybe not so stable from invasion like I first speculated. I wonder if ruskis would fix PIM first?
by Rfulton
Tue Feb 22, 2022 4:26 am
Forum: Announcements
Topic: v7.1.3 is released!
Replies: 251
Views: 56918

Re: v7.1.3 is released!

PIM on ccr2004 still not working. no interface shows up as dynamic after making template.
by Rfulton
Tue Feb 22, 2022 4:16 am
Forum: RouterOS beta
Topic: PIM-SM not working at all
Replies: 5
Views: 4341

Re: PIM-SM not working at all

still not working in 7.1.3
by Rfulton
Fri Jan 07, 2022 4:13 pm
Forum: RouterOS beta
Topic: DNS DST-NAT to adguard Intermittent Issue [SOLVED]
Replies: 16
Views: 6687

Re: DNS DST-NAT to adguard Intermittent Issue [SOLVED]

When I do a packet capture on the CCR2004 *BEFORE NAT*

I can see 10 requests for purple.com on both the 9200 and ccr2004.

It appears to be an intermittent issue with NAT
by Rfulton
Fri Jan 07, 2022 4:04 pm
Forum: RouterOS beta
Topic: DNS DST-NAT to adguard Intermittent Issue [SOLVED]
Replies: 16
Views: 6687

Re: DNS DST-NAT to adguard Intermittent Issue [SOLVED]

Here's the captures, my cisco 9200 gets 100% of the DNS requests on the packet capture.

The ccr2004 only services about 25% of them i can tell in the packet capture.

0x0072 was serviced,
0x0073-77 wasn't
0x0078 was serviced
by Rfulton
Fri Jan 07, 2022 3:08 am
Forum: RouterOS beta
Topic: DNS DST-NAT to adguard Intermittent Issue [SOLVED]
Replies: 16
Views: 6687

Re: DNS DST-NAT to adguard Intermittent Issue [SOLVED]

I disabled IPV6 for testing.
by Rfulton
Fri Jan 07, 2022 1:11 am
Forum: RouterOS beta
Topic: DNS DST-NAT to adguard Intermittent Issue [SOLVED]
Replies: 16
Views: 6687

Re: DNS DST-NAT to adguard Intermittent Issue [SOLVED]

The requests reach the adguard 100% of the time. the response reaches the client maybe 25% of the time. Let me actually correct this, It's only NATing to the Adguard around 25% of the time. If i do a packet capture with these parameters. I can see the successes. On the failures I have no entry from...
by Rfulton
Fri Jan 07, 2022 12:45 am
Forum: RouterOS beta
Topic: DNS DST-NAT to adguard Intermittent Issue [SOLVED]
Replies: 16
Views: 6687

Re: DNS DST-NAT to adguard Intermittent Issue [SOLVED]

Sob, you have a great point. I've tracked it back to the CCR2004 which is why I've made this forum post.

If it was having issues on my cisco 9200, I'd be on the cisco forums and not here.
by Rfulton
Fri Jan 07, 2022 12:24 am
Forum: Announcements
Topic: v7.1.1 is released!
Replies: 443
Views: 225783

Re: v7.1.1 is released!

Atom 270N does not work Hairpin Nat Broken. It definitely would help if you provide more details to describe problems. Do you ask your doctor for help saying "I'm feeling ill"? :) I typically only report problems anymore because I'm around 0-10 of getting a fix, but here is the forum post...
by Rfulton
Fri Jan 07, 2022 12:23 am
Forum: RouterOS beta
Topic: DNS DST-NAT to adguard Intermittent Issue [SOLVED]
Replies: 16
Views: 6687

Re: DNS DST-NAT to adguard Intermittent Issue [SOLVED]

The requests reach the adguard 100% of the time.

the response reaches the client maybe 25% of the time.
by Rfulton
Thu Jan 06, 2022 9:23 pm
Forum: Announcements
Topic: v7.1.1 is released!
Replies: 443
Views: 225783

Re: v7.1.1 is released!

Hairpin Nat Broken.
by Rfulton
Thu Jan 06, 2022 8:57 pm
Forum: RouterOS beta
Topic: DNS DST-NAT to adguard Intermittent Issue [SOLVED]
Replies: 16
Views: 6687

Re: DNS DST-NAT to adguard Intermittent Issue [SOLVED]

# jan/06/2022 13:54:52 by RouterOS 7.1.1 # software id = BB3F-L5VJ # # model = CCR2004-1G-12S+2XS # serial number = D4F10D99618F /interface bridge add name=VPN-Bridge /interface ethernet set [ find default-name=sfp-sfpplus12 ] name=SFP12-WAN set [ find default-name=sfp-sfpplus1 ] advertise=\ 10M-ha...
by Rfulton
Thu Jan 06, 2022 8:39 pm
Forum: RouterOS beta
Topic: DNS DST-NAT to adguard Intermittent Issue [SOLVED]
Replies: 16
Views: 6687

Re: DNS DST-NAT to adguard Intermittent Issue [SOLVED]

Could you please point out the rule that is having the issue? # serial number = D4F10D99618F /ip firewall nat add action=masquerade chain=srcnat comment="defconf: masquerade" ipsec-policy=out,none out-interface-list=WAN /ip firewall nat add action=dst-nat chain=dstnat comment=Plex dst-port...
by Rfulton
Thu Jan 06, 2022 8:14 pm
Forum: RouterOS beta
Topic: DNS DST-NAT to adguard Intermittent Issue [SOLVED]
Replies: 16
Views: 6687

Re: DNS DST-NAT to adguard Intermittent Issue [SOLVED]

Forgot to attach image
by Rfulton
Thu Jan 06, 2022 7:55 pm
Forum: RouterOS beta
Topic: DNS DST-NAT to adguard Intermittent Issue [SOLVED]
Replies: 16
Views: 6687

DNS DST-NAT to adguard Intermittent Issue [SOLVED]

Having an issue where my DNS redirection isn’t working correctly. my client at 192.168.91.5 asks for a dns request from 1.1.1.1 when it finally reaches 192.168.255.1 (ccr2004) it should be DST-NAT to the adguard server at 192.168.90.38. The rules should be correct, when it comes in from anything !Ad...
by Rfulton
Tue Dec 21, 2021 7:15 pm
Forum: Announcements
Topic: v7.2rc1 is released!
Replies: 240
Views: 161273

Re: v7.2rc1 is released!

OSPF 100% broken after update.

Not seeing neighbors anymore.
by Rfulton
Mon Dec 06, 2021 3:06 pm
Forum: RouterOS beta
Topic: Does PIM work AT ALL on 7.1?
Replies: 12
Views: 6680

Re: Does PIM work AT ALL on 7.1?

No it's not working.

Frankly at this point stable probably means "stable from invasion from Russia" Hopefully Putin can change management when he finally invades this failed former soviet state.
by Rfulton
Fri Dec 03, 2021 5:08 pm
Forum: Announcements
Topic: v7.1 is released!
Replies: 785
Views: 226804

Re: v7.1 [testing] is released!

PIM-SM interface not showing up on CCR2004. Works fine on 4011. _________________________________________________________________ [admin@MikroTik] /routing/pimsm> export # dec/03/2021 10:06:09 by RouterOS 7.1rc7 # software id = S813-IYL4 # # model = RB4011iGS+ # serial number = D1270BEDA968 /routing...
by Rfulton
Mon Oct 11, 2021 1:51 am
Forum: RouterOS beta
Topic: v7.1rc4 [development] is released!
Replies: 276
Views: 83173

Re: v7.1rc4 [development] is released!

I've worried, for example, that BQL support didn't make several mikrotik device drivers, and thus running fq_codel or cake at line rate (which is way less cpu intensive than shaping) won't work as well as it could. Do you think it will ever be fixed? Is it possible someone can translate your fixes ...
by Rfulton
Mon Sep 27, 2021 2:51 pm
Forum: RouterOS beta
Topic: CCR2004 High CPU Usage ROS7 [SOLVED]
Replies: 12
Views: 15791

Re: CCR2004 High CPU Usage ROS7 [SOLVED]

I want to get as much of this in writing as I can. Just to clarify, you claim that the CCR2004, which was built FOR ROS7 which all 25, and 10gb SFP+ ports, can't to 2gb because of route caching, something that you didn't expect to exist on ROS7. To be clear, my ccr2004 won't reach 2gb without Cake, ...
by Rfulton
Mon Sep 27, 2021 1:54 am
Forum: RouterOS beta
Topic: CCR2004 High CPU Usage ROS7 [SOLVED]
Replies: 12
Views: 15791

CCR2004 High CPU Usage ROS7 [SOLVED]

Just like the title says.

900mbps on ros6 ~5-10% cpu usage.

Same config on ros7 ~35% cpu usage.

With Cake I'm at ~60% cpu usage.

Can we expect improvements in the future? Or will I need a more powerful model to get 2gb consistently with Cake.
by Rfulton
Mon Sep 20, 2021 4:07 pm
Forum: RouterOS beta
Topic: IPv6 response connection state new,invalid
Replies: 16
Views: 6444

Re: IPv6 response connection state new,invalid

Ive reported IPV6 connection tracking being broken with queues for a long time now.

They repeatedly told me they can't recreate the issue, buy a TP-Link instead.
by Rfulton
Sat Sep 18, 2021 4:28 am
Forum: RouterOS beta
Topic: v7.1rc3 [development] is released!
Replies: 172
Views: 50696

Re: v7.1rc3 [development] is released!

CCR2004 rebooted after 8 days of uptime. It's over.

I've contacted my bank to conduct a chargeback on my purchase. I'm not paying for shipping.
by Rfulton
Tue Sep 07, 2021 1:37 am
Forum: RouterOS beta
Topic: v7.1rc2 [development] is released!
Replies: 194
Views: 44495

Re: v7.1rc2 [development] is released!

Rfulton, what do you expect from us on the forum? Nobody here can help you - please create a supout.rif after the crash and send it to support.
Ain't that the absolute 100% truth. Nobody can fix my kernal panics or it would be fixed already.
by Rfulton
Mon Sep 06, 2021 4:07 pm
Forum: RouterOS beta
Topic: v7.1rc2 [development] is released!
Replies: 194
Views: 44495

Re: v7.1rc2 [development] is released!

KERNAL panic after 3 days on rc2. ccr2004. no i won't log a ticket
by Rfulton
Thu Sep 02, 2021 2:43 pm
Forum: RouterOS beta
Topic: v7.1rc2 [development] is released!
Replies: 194
Views: 44495

Re: v7.1rc2 [development] is released!

CCR2004 Still crashes when a cap tries to register, but not provision. I want a formal apology. Currently there are no known issues with CAPsMAN in v7. Please open a formal bug report through support@mikrotik.com "Currently there are no known issues with CAPsMAN in v7." I just found it, a...
by Rfulton
Thu Sep 02, 2021 4:06 am
Forum: RouterOS beta
Topic: v7.1rc2 [development] is released!
Replies: 194
Views: 44495

Re: v7.1rc2 [development] is released!

CCR2004 Still crashes when a cap tries to register, but not provision.

I want a formal apology.
by Rfulton
Wed Sep 01, 2021 9:53 pm
Forum: RouterOS beta
Topic: v7.1rc2 [development] is released!
Replies: 194
Views: 44495

Re: v7.1rc2 [development] is released!

Does CCR2004 still crash using capsman?
I will ask daily, no worries.
by Rfulton
Wed Sep 01, 2021 5:04 pm
Forum: RouterOS beta
Topic: v7.1rc2 [development] is released!
Replies: 194
Views: 44495

Re: v7.1rc2 [development] is released!

"?" has been replaced by F1
Hi Raimonds,

Why was this changed?
My first guess based on history is change quotas. ROS7 is the star citizen of networking.
by Rfulton
Tue Aug 31, 2021 4:21 pm
Forum: RouterOS beta
Topic: v7.1rc2 [development] is released!
Replies: 194
Views: 44495

Re: v7.1rc2 [development] is released!

Does CCR2004 still crash using capsman?
by Rfulton
Mon Aug 30, 2021 6:10 pm
Forum: RouterOS beta
Topic: v7.1rc1 [development] is released!
Replies: 344
Views: 78111

Re: v7.1rc1 [development] is released!

Will wifiwave2 ever be supported via capsman? Running it on my Audience and the speeds are awesome in comparison to regular wireless, but missing capsman.
capsman doesn't work at all in ros7 so it might be a long while.
by Rfulton
Sat Aug 28, 2021 6:54 pm
Forum: RouterOS beta
Topic: v7.1rc1 [development] is released!
Replies: 344
Views: 78111

Re: v7.1rc1 [development] is released!

I don't think any of "stable" let alone "long-term" releases ever had any CLI-only item.
https://mikrotik.com/download/changelogs
Stable > Expand > Search "CLI Only"
Screenshot_3.png
You didn't have to embarrass him in front of everyone, but I'm glad you did.
by Rfulton
Sat Aug 28, 2021 3:50 pm
Forum: RouterOS beta
Topic: v7.1rc1 [development] is released!
Replies: 344
Views: 78111

Re: v7.1rc1 [development] is released!

"Only available from commandline" has been around for years. It's not v7 specific.
You think they would have fixed it for V7. I don't have to jump out of ASDM for cisco just to manage my ASA.
by Rfulton
Sat Aug 28, 2021 12:40 am
Forum: RouterOS beta
Topic: v7.1rc1 [development] is released!
Replies: 344
Views: 78111

Re: v7.1rc1 [development] is released!

So people that get RC2 early will have to update to RC2?

There will be two different RC2 floating around with the same version number? Are you sure you are making sense?
by Rfulton
Sat Aug 28, 2021 12:16 am
Forum: RouterOS beta
Topic: v7.1rc1 [development] is released!
Replies: 344
Views: 78111

Re: v7.1rc1 [development] is released!

why isn't RC2 posted on the main page so we can tear it apart?
by Rfulton
Fri Aug 27, 2021 9:30 pm
Forum: RouterOS beta
Topic: v7.1rc1 [development] is released!
Replies: 344
Views: 78111

Re: v7.1rc1 [development] is released!

Can someone confirm enabling capsman does not cause it to crash on ccr2004?

You don't have to configure it whatsoever, simply enabling capsman on ccr2004 rc1 causes it to reboot every minute or so.
by Rfulton
Fri Aug 27, 2021 7:32 pm
Forum: RouterOS beta
Topic: v7.1rc1 [development] is released!
Replies: 344
Views: 78111

Re: v7.1rc1 [development] is released!

Is the CCR2004 stable on RC2?

Does capsman work?
by Rfulton
Fri Aug 27, 2021 2:58 am
Forum: RouterOS beta
Topic: v7.1rc1 [development] is released!
Replies: 344
Views: 78111

Re: v7.1rc1 [development] is released!

You are welcome for Alpha testing this new product, when can we expect the Beta version?
by Rfulton
Wed Aug 25, 2021 3:20 pm
Forum: RouterOS beta
Topic: v7.1rc1 [development] is released!
Replies: 344
Views: 78111

Re: v7.1rc1 [development] is released!

Creating a new WIFI Wave 2 interface and assigning the same country code as the physical interfaces reports "Country not allowed"


I cannot create a sub interface whatsoever.
by Rfulton
Tue Aug 24, 2021 5:43 pm
Forum: RouterOS beta
Topic: v7.1rc1 [development] is released!
Replies: 344
Views: 78111

Re: v7.1rc1 [development] is released!

CCR2004 rebooted after 12 hours.

Reverting back to stable.
by Rfulton
Tue Aug 24, 2021 4:08 am
Forum: RouterOS beta
Topic: v7.1rc1 [development] is released!
Replies: 344
Views: 78111

Re: v7.1rc1 [development] is released!

Wave 2 on audience can't do vlan tagging. srsly.....
by Rfulton
Tue Aug 24, 2021 3:47 am
Forum: RouterOS beta
Topic: v7.1rc1 [development] is released!
Replies: 344
Views: 78111

Re: v7.1rc1 [development] is released!

capsman crashes immediately on ccr2004
by Rfulton
Mon Aug 23, 2021 4:58 pm
Forum: RouterOS beta
Topic: v7.1rc1 [development] is released!
Replies: 344
Views: 78111

Re: v7.1rc1 [development] is released!

Can someone confirm that GRE Keepalive timers are working?
by Rfulton
Wed Jun 30, 2021 4:30 pm
Forum: RouterOS beta
Topic: CCR2004 Mangle/Prerouting Queue Tree Upload Broken [SOLVED]
Replies: 1
Views: 1867

Re: CCR2004 Mangle/Prerouting Queue Tree Upload Broken [SOLVED]

Might have resolved it, you might have to use passthrough on the connection mark so it will get to the packet mark.
by Rfulton
Thu May 20, 2021 10:32 pm
Forum: RouterOS beta
Topic: v7.1beta6 [development] is released!
Replies: 377
Views: 243571

Re: v7.1beta6 [development] is released!

Anyone who has some problems with OSPF please contact support with attached supout files and brief description on what exactly is not working. "OSPF not work" doesn't help much.
So they can tell you "Sorry works on my machine" lmao alright fam.
by Rfulton
Thu May 20, 2021 3:46 pm
Forum: RouterOS beta
Topic: v7.1beta6 [development] is released!
Replies: 377
Views: 243571

Re: v7.1beta6 [development] is released!

OSPF doesn't work on CCR2004.

Simple queues targeting an interface makes all ipv6 traffic marked as invalid in firewall filter.
by Rfulton
Sat May 08, 2021 7:16 pm
Forum: RouterOS beta
Topic: v7.1beta5 [development] is released!
Replies: 292
Views: 86480

Re: v7.1beta5 [development] is released!

My issue was resolved by disabling queues that target 0.0.0.0/0.
by Rfulton
Sat May 08, 2021 6:43 pm
Forum: RouterOS beta
Topic: v7.1beta5 [development] is released!
Replies: 292
Views: 86480

Re: v7.1beta5 [development] is released!

Can you post the rules? Ive seen 3 others post about ipv6 connection tracking being broken. Another one is in this exact same thread. Hi, you can get the rules from your own device easily: /system default-configuration print Make sure your window is wide enough first or the ends of the lines will b...
by Rfulton
Sat May 08, 2021 2:05 am
Forum: RouterOS beta
Topic: v7.1beta5 [development] is released!
Replies: 292
Views: 86480

Re: v7.1beta5 [development] is released!

It appears IPV6 connection tracking does not work on 7.5Beta5? It works fine for me, but I am using the factory default MikroTik IPv6 firewall config and not the one from help.mikrotik.com that you pasted. Can you post the rules? Ive seen 3 others post about ipv6 connection tracking being broken. A...
by Rfulton
Tue May 04, 2021 8:00 pm
Forum: RouterOS beta
Topic: v7.1beta5 [development] is released!
Replies: 292
Views: 86480

Re: v7.1beta5 [development] is released!

It appears IPV6 connection tracking does not work on 7.5Beta5?
by Rfulton
Tue May 04, 2021 1:54 am
Forum: RouterOS beta
Topic: v7.1beta5 [development] is released!
Replies: 292
Views: 86480

Re: v7.1beta5 [development] is released!

My drop invalid rule is dropping pings on the return from internal on IPV6 Drop Invalid forward: in:UplinkToCisco-LAN out:ETH1-WAN, src-mac 7c:21:0e:d9:cc:c0, proto ICMP (type 129, code 0), 2600:ccc0->2604:2001, len 64 9 ;;; defconf: drop invalid chain=forward action=drop connection-state=invalid lo...
by Rfulton
Thu Apr 15, 2021 9:01 pm
Forum: RouterOS beta
Topic: v7.1beta5 [development] is released!
Replies: 292
Views: 86480

Re: v7.1beta5 [development] is released!

Fix GRE keepalive please.
by Rfulton
Sat Apr 10, 2021 4:59 am
Forum: RouterOS beta
Topic: v7.1beta5 [development] is released!
Replies: 292
Views: 86480

Re: v7.1beta5 [development] is released!

Is there no way to redistribute default route 0.0.0.0/0 to WAN using new OSPF? my other routers aren't getting it.
by Rfulton
Fri Apr 09, 2021 2:02 am
Forum: RouterOS beta
Topic: v7.1beta5 [development] is released!
Replies: 292
Views: 86480

Re: v7.1beta5 [development] is released!

on my 4011, it's stuck "calculating download size"

Image

https://imgur.com/a/uO2Oaju
by Rfulton
Fri Jul 31, 2020 11:18 pm
Forum: General
Topic: OVPN TLS handshake failed
Replies: 11
Views: 8873

Re: OVPN TLS handshake failed

"If you want anyone to learn a lesson or something, you should probably direct this to someone from MikroTik" Let's be serious, of course I want them to learn a lesson, the same lesson I want my dog to learn when I leave steaks on the floor and he eats them when he shouldn't. Do you think ...
by Rfulton
Fri Jul 31, 2020 8:23 pm
Forum: General
Topic: OVPN TLS handshake failed
Replies: 11
Views: 8873

Re: OVPN TLS handshake failed

Yall have me so impressed with your support, I went ahead and bought 153k worth of cisco devices https://imgur.com/a/AXtvX44 Comes with 3 year good support :) https://imgur.com/a/lOPPDwC Maybe next year mikro-whatever. Also, if you manage to get routerOS install on an X86 without a cd-rom, please sh...
by Rfulton
Thu Jul 30, 2020 1:35 pm
Forum: General
Topic: OVPN TLS handshake failed
Replies: 11
Views: 8873

Re: OVPN TLS handshake failed

Daily bump.
by Rfulton
Thu Jul 30, 2020 4:42 am
Forum: General
Topic: OVPN TLS handshake failed
Replies: 11
Views: 8873

Re: OVPN TLS handshake failed

I made the common name the WAN address of the OVPN as well. I've spent roughly 4 hours doing every variation of tutorial and option. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LxxF7YFL3Ds https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ssrRrY8bDiA https://www.medo64.com/2016/12/simple-openvpn-server-on-mikrotik/ https://suppo...
by Rfulton
Thu Jul 30, 2020 4:07 am
Forum: General
Topic: OVPN TLS handshake failed
Replies: 11
Views: 8873

OVPN TLS handshake failed

Hello, I'm having an issue where I'm using a Mikrotik Device as an OVPN Server https://imgur.com/a/wbJU0xf The CA certificate(CA CRL host as WAN IP) and the Client Certificate(with password) was exported, and then imported into a Mikrotik device to be the OVPN Client. https://imgur.com/HFw7ZG0 Any h...
by Rfulton
Fri Apr 24, 2020 5:23 pm
Forum: Forwarding Protocols
Topic: OSPF over GRE
Replies: 1
Views: 1725

Re: OSPF over GRE

Here's what my LSA with the Pfsense over GRE looks like. instance=default area=backbone type=router id=3.3.3.3 originator=3.3.3.3 sequence-number=0x8000003D age=289 checksum=0x6872 options="E" body= flags=EXTERNAL link-type=Point-To-Point id=1.1.1.1 data=0.0.0.16 metric=10 link-type=Stub i...
by Rfulton
Fri Apr 24, 2020 5:00 pm
Forum: Forwarding Protocols
Topic: OSPF over GRE
Replies: 1
Views: 1725

OSPF over GRE

Hello, I have a GRE tunnel build with a pfsense box across a wan link, That is working great. When setting up OSPF between the two, I get a dynamic link as such. 1 D interface=GRE cost=10 priority=1 authentication=none authentication-key="" authentication-key-id=1 network-type=point-to-poi...
by Rfulton
Mon Apr 06, 2020 3:11 pm
Forum: General
Topic: L2tp Road Warrior Issue
Replies: 3
Views: 1571

Re: L2tp Road Warrior Issue

Yes, it works on every other computer. Client worked after a reformat. Not even reinstalling the WAN L2TP adapter fixed it.

Thanks for the look though.
by Rfulton
Sun Apr 05, 2020 6:33 pm
Forum: General
Topic: L2tp Road Warrior Issue
Replies: 3
Views: 1571

Re: L2tp Road Warrior Issue

Most likely a broken l2tp in windows installation.

I installed checkpoint ssl vpn client and it hasn't worked since, even after uninstall. Lesson learned!
by Rfulton
Sun Apr 05, 2020 4:41 pm
Forum: General
Topic: L2tp Road Warrior Issue
Replies: 3
Views: 1571

L2tp Road Warrior Issue

Getting this when authenticating, works on every other computer but a single one.

Error logs not showing a whole lot, or I can't interpret them good enough.

Not sure where to go from here to be honest.
by Rfulton
Fri Dec 28, 2018 1:07 am
Forum: General
Topic: Vlan on Hex device
Replies: 8
Views: 3143

Re: Vlan on Hex device

nah doesn't work.

I literally removed eth5 from the bridge.

I simple create a new vlan interface on eth 5.

I assign the addresses and the dhcp server to the vlan interface on eth5,

It just gives no ip address whatsoever.
by Rfulton
Thu Dec 27, 2018 11:57 pm
Forum: General
Topic: Vlan on Hex device
Replies: 8
Views: 3143

Re: Vlan on Hex device

So keep the ethernet 5 interface,

Make a vlan on it,

then remove the port from all bridges?

That should be all it takes besides assigning address and DHCP to the new vlan interface?
by Rfulton
Thu Dec 27, 2018 7:59 pm
Forum: General
Topic: Vlan on Hex device
Replies: 8
Views: 3143

Re: Vlan on Hex device

I just want any traffic on port 5 to get a vlan tag of 500.

I also want my DHCP to assign addresses based on that VLAN tag as well.

No luck in implementing it though.
by Rfulton
Thu Dec 27, 2018 7:39 pm
Forum: General
Topic: Vlan on Hex device
Replies: 8
Views: 3143

Vlan on Hex device

Scoured the internet 3 days on this. I literally just want to setup a vlan on a single port on my Hex router. Diagram as follow Modem -----------RD750GR3 Port 1 off router = WAN Port 2 = Switch Port 5 = Port i want a vlan of 500, from what i understand this is a vlan access port where all traffic is...
by Rfulton
Wed Aug 09, 2017 1:43 am
Forum: Beginner Basics
Topic: Hairpin NAT as usual;
Replies: 2
Views: 1094

Re: Hairpin NAT as usual;

"Make sure your port forward/dstnat does NOT use an in-interface filter from WAN otherwise hairpin will not work as you are comming from bridge-local (or whatever your LAN is)."

For anyone wondering what the issue was.
by Rfulton
Tue Aug 08, 2017 2:26 am
Forum: Beginner Basics
Topic: Hairpin NAT as usual;
Replies: 2
Views: 1094

Hairpin NAT as usual;

Hello, before I send my mikrotik back i wanted to consult the forums one last time. I can access my terraria server externally using my domain name and the port. 5 ;;; Hairpin Terraria chain=srcnat action=masquerade protocol=tcp src-address=192.168.1.0/24 dst-address=192.168.1.100 dst-address-type=l...