Is this feature enough to automatically assign IP Phones to specific VLAN (ie configuring a VoiceVLAN per port) ?Version 6.48beta35 has been released.
*) discovery - added "lldp-med-net-policy-vlan" property for assigning VLAN ID (CLI only);
For curiosity's sake, which current AP (any brand or model) do comply with this "802.3bt daisy chain" ?- cAP ax
- 802.3BT switches
Yes, an official statement about mUPS Pro plans, if such still exists, would be very welcome.yes, there is another thread, it's over 6 months old so time for new!
Is this product going to see the light of day?
May I add that, if my understanding is correct, 802.3bt also brings multi-gigabit (2.5, 5 or 10Gb/s).- 802.3BT switches
I've never heard about EVPN before.EVPN multihoming is better than MC-LAG
MC-LAG is dead.
@Reinis:We are researching ways how to implement MC-LAG
+1 for outdoor switches availability predictionThough I'm also really interested in the new outdoor switches (CSS610-8P-2S+, CRS318-16P-2S+, CRS318-16Fi-2S), is there any prediction as to when they'll be released?
Yes, I agree, TR069 and Zero-touch configuration are not to be confused.For ISP - it is not a problem. For ex. you have 30000 rb951ui and tr-069. But some of them - under the NAT. So, you have 2 options - vpn and stun. I prefer stun. Clear?
To keep plug-n-play feature of TR069-Annex G-enabled router, a public STUN server address or hostname should, by default, be configured in Mikrotik router default config, right ?+1 for STUN
What are the technical downsides of using a Dish instead of a Wire ?With 60m clear LOS you van espect 1GBit with Wireless Wire you don’t need the dish
Am I correct this only involves one DUT interface ?This will send traffic from TG, through DUT and back to TG.
I'm currently doing load testing with CRSXXX devices....
For self-switch test:
How did you exactly do this ?I waste so many hours and finally found this thread. @2frogs solution works for me - just disabled RSTP!
Not exactly: after searching in Winbox GUI, I couldn't find a way to do it.Huh, I've always though you can transfer a file also when using MAC winbox connection. Are you saying it doesn't work?
What is it meant by "single session" ?There is an upper limit to the speed you can achieve with a single session.
I ordered one CCR1009, this morning.CRS112 is definitely not for you unless you want to start a thread now asking why it won't route at the correct speeds! With that kind of connectivity I would strongly suggest looking at something like a CCR1009.