In previous 7.1rcX, adding verbose to the export used to make it work - have you tried that?Export started at oct/12/2021 10:40:20 by RouterOS 7.1rc4, and it's been stuck on this for 14 minutes so far
A post on the forum is not sufficient for this. You have to open a support ticket. Officially, it should even be raised via your reseller. But it can only succeed if the switch chip used supports such functionality.Developers need to read this post and respond plz
@iegg, please have a look at this post and tell me whether it helps remove some of that confusion.I really wish Mikrotik wouldn't have chosen the name bridge for the switch-like grouping of ports AND for the Layer 3 (CPU-Port) capabilities. It is very confusing.
So to contribute - if I remember right, I had this problem when CHR was at one end and RB1000AHx4 at the other one.Meanwhile I opened a case with Mikrotik and I sent this thread... let's see what happen
There is - https://wiki.mikrotik.com/wiki/Manual:I ... P_Bindings . But it is an additional management burden as compared to splitting the networks.I was just thinking there has to be a way to make an address list for IoTs and make them all static will solve it!!
Yes, both of us came to the same conclusion/solution, let's wait for the OP's reactionSomething like this?