I did not ask for a screenshot, I do believe you when you say it is red, no need to prove it to me by a screenshot. I asked for an export to see what is wrong in the configuration.heres a screenshot
Exactly. It's just that the official name is so meaningless that I cannot remember it.Do you mean the new endpoint NAT function?
I don't like open ends, so yes, it isIs this the correct info that i should provide ?
Here you go: viewtopic.php?p=902082#p902082 (and the three posts after just in case).If we can setup a teamviewer/remote session that we could work through it the mikrotik config part in order for it to push a static ip for the sonicwall i would really be grateful.
You seem to have been lucky so far to only meet customers that are small enough and/or competent enough that setting up remote access for contractors is a fast process. Believe me or not, it is not always the caseyour question description is too obvious that the company simply don't trust you
Of course it can, I've just got too distracted by the ESP in UDP thing and forgot to explicitly mention that.why cannot Cisco R1 initiate an IPsec connection to Cisco R2, so Mikrotik R1 will see it as a regular IP traffic?