Community discussions

Search found 12 matches

by Zloy2452
Fri Oct 25, 2019 10:08 am
Forum: RouterOS v7 BETA
Topic: CHR 7.0 Beta 3 CPU load on one core goes to 100%
Replies: 5
Views: 1152

Re: CHR 7.0 Beta 3 CPU load on one core goes to 100%

I had the same issue. After update from stable to v7.0b3 the CPU load on my RB951G-2HnD were hitting 100% without any reason. Downgrade back to stable version fixed the issue.
by Zloy2452
Tue Nov 13, 2018 8:31 pm
Forum: General
Topic: Webfig remote access from WAN
Replies: 18
Views: 5773

Re: Webfig remote access from WAN

OK, I'll think about it. Thank you guys!
by Zloy2452
Tue Nov 13, 2018 12:02 pm
Forum: General
Topic: Webfig remote access from WAN
Replies: 18
Views: 5773

Re: Webfig remote access from WAN

It seems my ISP is blocking port 80. I have changed port number and now all works fine! The problem is solved! Thanks to all!
by Zloy2452
Sun Nov 11, 2018 10:44 pm
Forum: General
Topic: Webfig remote access from WAN
Replies: 18
Views: 5773

Re: Webfig remote access from WAN

Jotne, thanks, but I have already tried this and it's not working! Firewall shows no input packets when I'm trying to connect from WAN. Only LAN connection works fine. Any ideas why?
by Zloy2452
Sun Nov 11, 2018 11:53 am
Forum: General
Topic: Webfig remote access from WAN
Replies: 18
Views: 5773

Re: Webfig remote access from WAN

OK, here is my config in attachment. Please, help!
by Zloy2452
Sat Nov 10, 2018 7:39 pm
Forum: General
Topic: Webfig remote access from WAN
Replies: 18
Views: 5773

Re: Webfig remote access from WAN

Config? Do you mean Supout.rif?
by Zloy2452
Sat Nov 10, 2018 6:43 pm
Forum: General
Topic: Webfig remote access from WAN
Replies: 18
Views: 5773

Webfig remote access from WAN

Hello! I need a remote acces to my router over Webfig. I have enabled DDNS in IP - Cloud. When I open http://XXXXXXXXXXXX.sn.mynetname.net/ in browser, it works fine, but only from my home network. From WAN it doesn't work! I have no firewall rules which may block remote access. I have also port 80 ...
by Zloy2452
Fri Jul 06, 2018 5:15 pm
Forum: General
Topic: Pushing static routes to Mikrotik over dnsmasq
Replies: 2
Views: 408

Re: Pushing static routes to Mikrotik over dnsmasq

Very disappointing news ;( I hoped there is a way to solve this problem in OpenVPN style. OpenVPN server pushes static routes to Mikrotik with no issues. But OVPN is too slow for me. SoftEther VPN is much better. But I should forget about split tunneling with it I guess ;( It's very sad. Thank you f...
by Zloy2452
Fri Jul 06, 2018 4:29 pm
Forum: General
Topic: Pushing static routes to Mikrotik over dnsmasq
Replies: 2
Views: 408

Pushing static routes to Mikrotik over dnsmasq

Hello! I need help! I have rb951g-2hnd router and SoftEther VPN server, connected to my router over L2TP protocol. I want to config split tunneling with my VPN. I have configured dnsmasq on my VPN to push static routes with 121 option (for example: "dhcp-option=121,175.25.32.0/24,10.100.0.1"). But i...
by Zloy2452
Mon Dec 18, 2017 8:44 pm
Forum: Announcements
Topic: v6.41rc [release candidate] is released! New bridge implementation!
Replies: 561
Views: 124719

Re: v6.41rc [release candidate] is released! New bridge implementation!

RafGan, thank you for posting this! I have mailed Mikrotik about this issue today, but have not received any answer from them by now. If so, I will not upgrade from rc56, until they add an option to disable this new "mega-useful" feature. It's very pity that they have broken a thing, which had been ...
by Zloy2452
Sun Dec 17, 2017 3:31 am
Forum: Announcements
Topic: v6.41rc [release candidate] is released! New bridge implementation!
Replies: 561
Views: 124719

Re: v6.41rc [release candidate] is released! New bridge implementation!

I have to stick with rc56 until DNS issue got fixed. Please, Mikrotik, we need a fix as soon as it possible!
by Zloy2452
Fri Dec 08, 2017 4:19 pm
Forum: General
Topic: 6.41rc61: DHCP server ignores dns-servers?
Replies: 9
Views: 1987

Re: 6.41rc61: DHCP server ignores dns-servers?

Hi! I can confirm this issue too. I have choosen the simplest solution and have reverted back to v6.41rc56 which works fine. I hope this issue will be fixed in the next RC.