And i' ve seen the packet flow diagram a hundred times... but i missed it... why why ....The queues in RouterOS only limit egress traffic
Ok my mistake...That's the whole point - the line is not 50/50 symmetric
Yes i know, am asking in general, how do we make the choice of an interface to be the upload or download one...We did not choose an interface but global - that's not an interface
I reproduced it as well and it gave me the expected result...I have just reproduced the error again. i will post details in a moment please bear with me. i am not going insane after all
No it does not solve the issue...why does creating a bogus default route on the main routing table otherwise solve my issue?
I wonder that too...Where is this super simple magical VPN tick box.
Isn't ESP encapsulated inside the UDP packet ?ESP need not be forwarded as if there is NAT at at least one end, it cannot be used.
@sindy could you remind me why this happens ?it will work with IKEv2 (for IKE(v1), you would need to forward also UDP port 500).
It is 2402-2407-2412 ...etc...2404-2408-2412-2417-2422 for C
/ip address
add address=192.168.2.1/24 comment=defconf interface=bridge network=\
192.168.2.0I can confirm that as well...And double click on an input field does not select the text.I guess most of you have already noticed that <TAB> key does not move focus from one input field to another.
Not really...has anyone heard anything from Mikrotik yet, shell we hope for ROS 7?
Yes...I guess most of you have already noticed that <TAB> key does not move focus from one input field to another.
Am not really sure how that would make sense...so even if the cable works with the PC, it may not with the Mikrotik
How sure are you of that command ?/system interface
If you did let the DHCP-Client on the slave interface (wlan) obviously it did...the dhcp client went red
Wrong is only something that makes our configuration not to work ?I've never found any issue to be actually fixed by moving the IP settings from the slave port to the bridge.
System -> Packages -> Check for Updates -> Download and InstallHow do I upgrade to 6.x? Net install?
Did you click the Link i posted ? That answer is from Mikrotik Support member...I'll remove fasttrack from the input chain when I see a verification in an official MT document.
Exactly, i did not go any further, i stopped when i saw that rule...This is just the beginning, not the end
It is on the back side i think...does not have one. Checked the board carefully
Chill out @acidsas, people here dedicate some of their time to help you...Please read carefully before reply.
Why are they ON? And why temporarily?IM posts are temporarily ON,,,,,, just click on the users name on the left hand margin to send message
Nice to clarify that @mkx...As others mentioned, switch shouldn't be doing that.
Correct...and that enables the auto 20/40 mode.
A multi Layer switch is just a Switch with Layer 3 capabilities...Yes, Multi-layer-switches can route at wire speed - MLS ....
I am not sure why this was the problem, switch1-cpu just gives access to CPU, needed or not i don't see why it caused a problem...I removed switch1-cpu from switch vlan and everything is working as expected.
Blocking others from doing what ?Blocking other based on dynamic address list
There are hundreds of reasons why a port could go Down/Up or a Router Reboots...I also faced this issue. Maybe last messages of the following post can help you.
Route at wire speed on the Switch ?If you want to route at wire speed on the switch YOU will need to look at other brands.
Well, exactly, if you are not sure of the Bandwidth the ISP gave you at the moment you can't blame the queues...One obvious cause may be that we do not get the 1 Gbps from our provider
The Bridge MTU must be set to 1500Byte...- change MTU to 1492 both in PPOE connection and in Bridge
Did they actually needed more Bandwidth and they could not have it ?During these periods the other groups have less than 330 Mbps.
Those problems are caused when there is no communication with the CPU, thats why we add the Bridge as Tagged member...The problem I see is why I CAPS master is unable to get an IP from the DCHP
Not you, not them, so who has access ?I have no access to the ISP modem, and neither does their useless tech support.
Why isn't your trunk post added in the tagged ports? bridge-oam,yourTrunkPort/interface bridge vlan
add bridge=bridge-oam tagged=bridge-oam untagged=KKHOME_VLAN_100 vlan-ids=100
Then sorry but you don't know what double NAT is...I don’t see this condition in my setup.
This is a Modem/Router....Cable modem is a Technicolor TC4400-AM
If you wonder if the rule is working, yes...So, do you believe my NAT rule will otherwise have the intended effects?
About 2 months ago that i made a lab for recursive routes and failover, as far as i remember the recursive routes were recalculated... version was 6.4x.y something...recursive routes are not recalculated (or something) and all traffic still goes via another uplink
You can already find and purchase this product...Mikrotik are supposed to be bringing out a Netpower 16P
Indeed, why is that ?and not a single word on routerboard.com.
With VPLS i guess......or MPLS if you prefer.
Ok that makes it clear to me now...this requirement is relevant for the bridges on the active network path between the two devices running LACP
Ναί
Where are you from? if i may ask...You mean disable RSTP on the Bridge ?on the radios, protocol-mode on the bridge between the Ethernet port and the wireless one must be set to none
There is no network equipment without vulnerabilities from any Vendor...something that MikroTik, with its RouterOS firmware, seems not to do too well.
You can always do an update to the latest ROS 6.46.5 ...So I think it is some bug in firmware...
If you test it in the future let us know how it goes...Not risking
haha @anav we are just trying our best...All we have is one modem and three APs, but hey you guys are the experts... ;-P
even though I am the admin there and I know that nothing would happen
That is always by far the Best...Run cables...always.
Yes that would be bad am sureI am at the moment to ill to go up to the mast to fix if I screw up.
Just a more tidy configuration... I never said there is a problem, relax @mkxI don't see where's the problem?@mkx am trying to think how we could avoid the creation of 2 Bridges but i can't find something...
Help on what ?I turned off my simple QoS queue so I could get fast track back on. I thought that would help.
So do you still believe they forgot to put paste on the CPU ?but, unfortunately after closing the case the CPU-temp has now risen to 63C
That is correct...anav says it can't work if dhcp is enabled on the bridge and associating a vlan with the bridge. Well I'm just saying that I saw her on a router in production and it works.
so I too am confused