Community discussions

MikroTik App

Search found 5 matches

by jwischka
Wed Jul 22, 2020 9:47 pm
Forum: RouterOS v7 BETA
Topic: Feature Request - Wireguard Protocol
Replies: 165
Views: 55077

Re: Feature Request - Wireguard Protocol

It's not an argument, how would something this large be implemented? Presumably the same way you implement anything on an embedded environment - through a lot of compile optimization and stripping out parts that aren't fully necessary for the actual CPU you are targeting or functionality you're not...
by jwischka
Wed Jul 22, 2020 8:02 pm
Forum: RouterOS v7 BETA
Topic: Feature Request - Wireguard Protocol
Replies: 165
Views: 55077

Re: Feature Request - Wireguard Protocol

How large is the Nebula codebase? Wireguard is compact, this is needed in devices that are already pushing the limits of what can fit into the limited remaining memory. Look, I'm not interested in escalating a bad-faith argument. I posted the link to the github above, if you're interested in checki...
by jwischka
Wed Jul 22, 2020 7:18 pm
Forum: RouterOS v7 BETA
Topic: Feature Request - Wireguard Protocol
Replies: 165
Views: 55077

Re: Feature Request - Wireguard Protocol

Personally I would much rather see vanilla Wireguard, simplicity and speed is all I need. Which Nebula also offers. In fact, Nebula offers basically all of the benefits of Wireguard with almost none of its drawbacks. It is, essentially, an administration framework that makes Wireguard functional at...
by jwischka
Mon Jul 20, 2020 5:56 pm
Forum: RouterOS v7 BETA
Topic: Feature Request - Wireguard Protocol
Replies: 165
Views: 55077

Re: Feature Request - Wireguard Protocol

Personally, I'd prefer to see Slack's nebula VPN (which is based on Wireguard) included instead of stock Wireguard. Nebula's three key benefits, as I see it are: 1) the mesh topology 2) the ability to choose different ciphers, if you want and most importantly 3) a much more robust PKI solution for d...
by jwischka
Sun Dec 17, 2017 11:25 pm
Forum: General
Topic: Feature Req: IKEv2 server and client
Replies: 291
Views: 98585

Re: Feature Req: IKEv2 server and client

Configuration question: I am trying to connect a RB450G to a pfSense 2.4.2 firewall as an IKEv2 client and tunnel all traffic over the tunnel. The IPSec connection itself is working properly: I connect to the remote peer with the "request only" config, the strongswan server gives me an IP ...