+1 for 464XLAT / CLAT support !

Hello, 3 CCR2004 Here, we are experiencing packet loss issues :

What speeds are going through it...what protocols are you running?

Less than 1gbps per router, with OSPF and 200k routes v4+v6 BGP.

Hello, 3 CCR2004 Here, we are experiencing packet loss issues : https://pix.milkywan.fr/tI6I1ha6.png We do have another issue related to OSPF and neighbors getting down for no reason : https://pix.milkywan.fr/By9dPBcr.png i tried woth both 6.49 Beta and 6.48.2 stable, but i didn't see any difference...

No, sorry, my 2004 is in production now

My 2004 is already in production, but i still have the CCR100X and the 4011 to lab the v7... For the moment, i'm trying to understand the new CLI...

So, you need BGP into ROS7 to peer to a virtual IXP (a bit useless to me) behind NAT ? You are running a multihomed network behind NAT ? That's crappy !

Btw VxLAN in ROS7 only supports Multicast IIRC, so, it will not work, even with BGP.

A basic ibgp configuration :

/routing bgp template
add as=65534 name=lab
/routing bgp connection
add local.role=ibgp remote.address=10.X.X.X template=lab

Or you can read the test results on the MikroTik Website and see that the switch is benched for ~1Gbit/s of L3 traffic.

Huh, no. The selection is done in random if all the other attributes used by the bgp path selection are the same or does not exist !

Same here, around 30 CCRs 1072&1036 in production, around 5Gbps in peak, no reboot issues...

You can reach 80gbps of unrealistic traffic with a 1072, but with real traffic, it begins to lost packets with a fraction of the max throughput.

I simulated a big bgp flap (2 sessions reset + 1 added). It is better than a Tilera, but still miles above a decent router : it took about 40 minutes to process all the routes to the CCR2004 it took about 1h23 to process all the routes to the CCR1016 It took about 2 minutes to process all the routes...

BGP Benchmarks are much better with a lower amount of routes : 1 Full (800k routes): * Insertion : 47 seconds * Removal : 7 seconds 2 Full (1,6M routes): * Insertion : 1 minute 9 seconds * Removal : 39 seconds 3 Full (2,4M routes) : * Insertion : 1 minute 29 seconds * Removal : 3 minutes 4 Full (3,2...

I didn't run any bandwith tests for now, i trust the Mikrotik's Datasheet

A bit better with 6.46.6 :

BGP Insertion (4xFullviews, ~3,2M routes) :
CCR2004 : 1m50s

BGP Removal (4xFullviews, ~3,2M routes) :
CCR2004 : 7m30s

But still slower than a 1009

Yes, i am aware of it, i am the author of this topic. You can also see that this current topic is earlier than the answers in the other topic

Hello, I just received my new CCR2004 and I couldn't wait to put it in the grill For the record, i also tested few other devices : - CCR1009 (7g-1c-1s+) v6.47b60 - CCR1016 (12s-1s+) v6.47b60 - RB4011 (igs-rm) v6.47b60 The CCR2004 runs its factory version 6.46.3 since there is no other package availa...

i don't want to risk to brick my new router since the factory version is not downloadable neither

The problem is that the router is now available since almost 2 weeks, and in 2 weeks, we should have access to stable or even testing !

Hello,

i just received my new fancy CCR2004, but there is a little problem :



You can't download any image, except long term, which is prior to the factory version (wtf ?)

Same thing on the Mikrotik Downloads page...

Hugues

+1 for vxlan, it's a must have in 2019 ! (but it was in 2017 too...)

Don't hope any BGP Multithreading, because it is useless (bgp is slow because of Tilera cores, and multithreading route injection in FIB is a mess), i just hope for better routing filters, i have sooooo many problems with the current implementation...

BGP4-MIB support on SNMP would be great too...