What you need is VRF.
Divide your ports into two separate VRF instances and each one will use it's own routing table.
Yes it is.Can you confirm that this is the correct setting for a XXX.128/25 subnet?
No it's not.but for anything that starts with a 0/XX, the Network Address get set to 1/XX.
Yes, that is the best solution.What if I changed the IP of the DNS Server to a different range?
Either move these entries to your server at .33, or you have to live with what you have now.I can't do that there are some specific static DNS entries available on the router, required to be available.
Probably 8-port switch + 10Gb combo-port.Interestingly only 9 wired ports..
It has nothing to do with the ROS version, this was always the case for 5GHz ac cards.Is this a bug, but I can't see 5GHz Current Tx Power? It is working fine and devices are connected, but just can't see anywhere the transmit power.
The tab is just empty. in 2.4GHz it's filled with numbers.
Nope.ISSUE FIXED !!!
I'm now on MacOS 11.0.1 Big Sur.
But i assume the solution is the same on previous MacOS Versions
Well, you kind of do...Should i paid HALF of price?
It is. Always forget about such limitations in newer macOS.I guess this is because netinstall is compiled for win32.
Can't find any info on that one.Not the wap ac LTE Kit (QCA9531).
And you are sure that you tried to connect by MAC, not by IP?I've been trying to login from winbox for Win, but no luck.
Try ading src-address=127.0.0.1 to this rule as well.I doubt the CAPsMAN rule ,,,,, possible ?
echo 1 > /proc/sys/kernel/sysrq
echo b > /proc/sysrq-trigger
Just answered the same question in a similar topic: viewtopic.php?f=2&t=168221&p=825432#p825432No problem,
but i'm curious. What are the benefits or downsides to each of those methods.
I could not find any definite answer on it in the mikrotik documentation.
Why bother reading the thread two messages up from your own...@mikrotik ... how to use VLANs correctly on CSS610-8G-2S+ ??
Indeed...@xvo's remark would make sense if you used 1.1.1.1 and 1.1.1.2 as GRE's local-address and remote-address; in your setup, you do need the tunnel=yes mode.
I’m not sure: this setting is needed to prevent mikrotik from writing into console port on startup.when i set slient-boot do i need rebootthe router?
As already stated - It's not a bug, but a misinterpretation of router's config options.
It doesn't. You need to use pair of /32 addresses with network specified as the "opposite" one.I'm not sure if Mikrotik supports /31 but I thought I'd mention it.
Have you seen this in the latest 6.48beta48?that there are no additional GPIO pins
viewtopic.php?f=21&t=163308#p822721*) m33g - added support for "/system gpio" menu (CLI only);
Are you sure they were in /flash folder, not in the root directory that is mounted to RAM?including wiping the file storage...where I had stored a couple backup configs
If all ports need to have the same set of tagged vlans, then there is no point really.This is an all wireless network with the AP's UN-tagging VLAN traffic. In this scenario, is there any advantage to tagging all the switch ports? Thanks again.
If you are talking about "special dummy rules", the will be deleted on first reboot once you delete the fasttrack rule in filter forard chain.Thanks for your reply, there are some default rule under the filter rules tab NAT tab or Mangle Which I am not able to delete.
And also (as a separate item) a kit that will make possible to mount two units in one 19" space.It would be really nice if for smaller devices like this CSS610-8G-2S+IN switch MikroTik bundles second ear for 10" racks mount that are increasingly popular ...
Only wAP ac LTE is IPQ-4018.Think about some of the devices built around the IPQ-4018/9 SoC, such as hAP ac², wAP ac, or cAP ac.
You can, but it might potentially break applications that rely on multiple parallel connections.also , can i use both-addresses-and-ports rather than both-addresses ?
Search field on the forum too? :)Antenna Gain doesn't show up on my settings
It is there, announced in May/2020:CCR 2004 is not longer listed in newsleter
and caralog ;) https://download2.mikrotik.com/catalog_2020.pdf
any idea why?
Yes, exactly.I assume the concern is throughput and CPU impact rather than function.
You mean proposals, right?but it fails on phase 2 i have double checked the policy's and they match
Just disable both wlan interfaces and don't change anything else in Home AP Dual setup.Tryed disabling both wlans, but when I did the config change to CAP
Public IP at one side is enough.but both office and home needs public ip address
802.3af / 802.3at is 48V (actually can be between 36-57V), so it is too much for RB260.Hi.
And what if I will plug ETH1 of RB260 to some PoE Switch with 802.3af / 802.3at? Because of passive PoE I am afraid auto-negotiation will fail to set proper voltage? Or it will work OK?
In this "Dude" tab.Nope, can connect with winbox but can't see the Dude tab on the left side panel.
Where do I need to set up the server settings on the router side?
Not if there are two switch chips.Having two bridges doesn't disable hardware offload for one of the bridges?
No, it's not.So it is not possible to distribute one TCP-Stream across all available Links?
Use multiple streams and balance-xor mode: it can use l3+l4 hash policy, so takes ports into account too.What are the alternatives, to archive full speed for these protocols?
Yeah, sure, things you've never seen, don't exist at all ;)Nobody has rukus I've never seen anyway
Should work the same way in this scenario.What if we leave target as blank though?
Probably you should wait for route cache to expire.And yes, rp-filter=strict, but I changed it to "no" without any success...
No luck involved here.If you're extremely lucky.
Not exactly worse. Just different.And what You say about HEX S? Better? Worse? (I do not need wifi antenna inside)
Yeah, I kind of also sometimes use distance to sort the routes, for which the exact order has no difference.I prefer to put the distance higher for the non marked route as this allow to sort per distance and makes complex routing table more readable
hAP ac2/RB450Gx4 and up.Dears,
I confirm that the 951g-2hnd is not able to carry more than 300-400 Mbps on 1Gbps link. In this case: which Mikrotik router do you recommend to fully use 1Gbps?
Yes, that would be logical.Shouldn't we be seeing the changelog from 6.45.9 to 6.46.7 not from 6.46.6 ? Going up a major version in a long-term release should be looked over a bit more carefully before we take the plunge.
If you use PCQ, then yes.the question I have is, is the excess shared equally or goes to the first person accessing it??
As unsatisfying as it sounds, but yes.So basically at the moment there's no better MikroTik device that will get me increased wireless speeds over what RB922 currently does.
Not 3-5 of course, but only ~300 employees total.Sometimes I think Normis and 3-5 other guys are the entire Mikrotik workforce
Are there any errors registered on the link (TX Stats/RX Stats)?other side is PowerBeam 5AC Gen2 --
what is strange if i setup manualy 1GB on MIkrotik -- there is no LINK with PowerBeam 5AC Gen2 -- must make Auto negotiation to work again :(
All ports or just the one?what can be reason LINK DOWN? ? for 2-3 s
/queue simple add dst=pppoe-out1 max-limit=10M/10M name=queue1 queue=default/default target=eth1
Ok! :)Yes, I think I understood. I'm okay with separate subnets.