CCR is also ignoring any route selections and nexthops I have set for it

I have route for subnet 10.112.0.0/16 via two gateways 10.133.44.1 and 10.219.220.254

The Mikrotik refuses to pick the second one under any circumstances.

Can anyone help with this?

Hello I am trying to set up recursive routing for several subnets I have followed every guide there is, mikrotik is detecting recursive routes propely, however it sees disconnected gateway as reachable as does not do the failover to another network. I am using CCR1009 with 6.48.5 long term. I have d...

Does this upgrade include the fix for the CCR-1072's that keep crashing when trying to run them at 1200Mhz ? (https://forum.mikrotik.com/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=122525) Did support@ tell you it should be fixed in this version? I can't see any signs of this in the topic. Also, this topic is for prob...

Oh god, im so glad i didnt upgrade. I have no room to experiment with production devices, yet mikrotik puts head in the sand instead of proper testing and fixing the 6.42 branch. Staying on 6.41, we’ll see in the following months if we’ll replace these with ciscos, better to have an expensive workin...

You´re trying to send SNMP traps over WAN? That´s a very bad idea in the first place, set up a VPN.

Any new info from mikrotik? they didnt even replied to me when i sent them the supout

Still no fix for chr hyperv?

No, no dynamic memory.

I did, no reply after week and a half, so there you go, everyone is silent about this botched build

Yea I had to do that also, 6.42.1 broke a lot of things, namely it completely broke the router on the Hyper-V platform, so this is a no go for me.

So it is widespread, thank you guys, filed a support request with supout file

Integration services for hyper-v completely broke CHR, router refuses to communicate after 10GBs of routed data. Reverted back to 6.41.4

More here: viewtopic.php?f=2&t=133716

Setup: Windows Hyper-V Server 2016 LACP Network Team through 4 NICs 4 Network adapters (1 untagged, 3 tagged) After upgrading to 6.42.1 system locks up after couple of hours, WAN (VLAN 2) stays on, LAN (VLAN 1) refuses to communicate, after another hour system loses connectivity completely, IPsec dr...

Thank you guys for pointing me to the right direction, there were two rules ip firewall nat chain=srcnat action=masquerade dst-address=192.168.18.0/24 ip firewall nat chain=srcnat action=masquerade dst-address=192.168.19.0/24 So basically everything that was natted came through gateway, since i have...

So I just realized this also happens with Intervlan routing, what the heck is going on? Why is this happening? routing.png The text in the red boxes is what Windows/Linux is reporting, basically everything is seen as traffic originating from gateway itself, why?? I never experienced this kind of beh...

Hello everyone, I just noticed one issue that I cannot even name properly but I´ll try to explain. Situation one : I have an Site-to-Site IPsec tunnel working fine, two Cisco routers, two networks: 192.168.1.0/24 and 192.168.18.0/24 Both ciscos running at 192.168.1.1 and 192.168.18.1 Traffic is pass...

Thank you!

I added
And it works now

Hello everyone, I´m new to Mikrotik and loving it so far, My ISP is giving me the /29 subnet of public IPs, these are # ADDRESS NETWORK INTERFACE 0 192.168.5.254/24 192.168.5.0 LAN 1 1.2.3.4/29 1.2.3.3 WAN 2 192.168.55.254/24 192.168.55.0 Management 3 192.168.127.254/24 192.168.127.0 Guest 4 1.2.3.5...