Community discussions

Search found 10 matches

by mikeeg02
Mon May 13, 2019 6:52 pm
Forum: Announcements
Topic: v6.44.3 [stable] is released!
Replies: 123
Views: 31739

Re: v6.44.3 [stable] is released!

I upgraded our system to 6.44.3 a few weeks ago. My "hub" router is a rb1100AHx4 dude edition that runs also the dude. After a few weeks of running, the routeros and http services on every device that utilized them timed out. Ping, and the other dude services worked, as well as the ospf and mpls ser...
by mikeeg02
Tue Apr 02, 2019 1:28 am
Forum: The Dude
Topic: Dude as a trap manager?
Replies: 3
Views: 634

Re: Dude as a trap manager?

What is a stable/reliable trap manager then?

I've been using the dude because its on standalone hardware, not associated with a computer. And it will poll snmp traps, just not work as a manager where it can just accept them.
by mikeeg02
Mon Apr 01, 2019 10:53 pm
Forum: The Dude
Topic: Dude as a trap manager?
Replies: 3
Views: 634

Dude as a trap manager?

I have a couple of pretty extensively setup snmp monitoring systems using a few mikrotik routers. I have snmp polling setup, but the one thing I cant seem to figure out, is how to make the dude act as a "trap manager" where it reacts when a snmp message from a device is sent to it (outside of pollin...
by mikeeg02
Thu Jan 03, 2019 8:58 pm
Forum: Forwarding Protocols
Topic: MPLS LDP Neighbor Addresses Blank
Replies: 6
Views: 1486

Re: MPLS LDP Neighbor Addresses Blank

The VPLS MTU is the size of the MTU you want to hand off to your customer. The interface MTU should be set to accommodate the overhead of VPLS. You need at least 1530 to send an 802.1q tagged frame through a VPLS tunnel. https://wiki.mikrotik.com/images/3/35/MTUVPLS.png Take a look at this MUM pres...
by mikeeg02
Tue Apr 17, 2018 9:14 pm
Forum: Forwarding Protocols
Topic: Network Design suggestions......
Replies: 4
Views: 591

Re: Network Design suggestions......

Ive done some path costing, and optimized routes to that extent, and considered how that will be affected in the event that a path is down. Recently I found that rp-filter was set to strict, which upon researching I have found to be more desireable to use loose. Changing so seems to of remedied the ...
by mikeeg02
Mon Apr 16, 2018 11:11 pm
Forum: Forwarding Protocols
Topic: Network Design suggestions......
Replies: 4
Views: 591

Network Design suggestions......

Sorry for my paint skills, or lack there of. My physical network layout is below. What I need is the redundancy of being able to use ANY route available to get where it needs to go, while also still being smart about it, and using the the least amount of hops. (They are all wirelessly connected, som...
by mikeeg02
Wed Apr 11, 2018 5:01 pm
Forum: Announcements
Topic: v6.41.4 [current]
Replies: 37
Views: 9807

Re: v6.41.4 [current]

mikeeg02 - Quoted fix is for CCR devices, not for the CRS. Does the same problem persist on 6.42rc version? Please test this if possible. If problem persist, then contact support. Im not sure why I said CRS, it is a CCR1009. My mistake, I'm about half sick. What was addressed with the tile improvem...
by mikeeg02
Tue Apr 10, 2018 11:48 pm
Forum: Announcements
Topic: v6.41.4 [current]
Replies: 37
Views: 9807

Re: v6.41.4 [current]

RouterOS version 6.41.4 has been released in public "current" channel! !) tile - improved overall system performance and stability ("/system routerboard upgrade" required); If you experience version related issues, then please send supout file from your router to support@mikrotik.com. File must be ...
by mikeeg02
Wed Apr 04, 2018 8:53 pm
Forum: Announcements
Topic: v6.41.3 [current]
Replies: 139
Views: 31164

Re: v6.41.3 [current]

While different. This sounds similar to what I'm experiencing. Router A cannot ping router F, but I can ping router F using router A as a gateway. Router A can establish a vpls tunnel to router F. There are some oddities that didn't present themself in 6.38.5 for me. I changed some path costs and ma...
by mikeeg02
Fri Mar 30, 2018 2:52 am
Forum: Announcements
Topic: v6.41.3 [current]
Replies: 139
Views: 31164

Re: v6.41.3 [current]

I'm not sure where to put this question so here goes. I've built a vpls network using mikrotik equipment (3011s and CCRs) that goes across the state using PTP microwave links,(26 sites/routers all together) using single 172.16.0.0/29 subnets per interface link. Everything was completely stable on 6....