The licensed links are all ~150 mb/s. The voice traffic is low, but all sites get the traffic at the same time. Each of the vpls tunnels should be capable of 10mb/s. The big thing is latency. One of the other reasons I was looking at the ah4 is I believe its the only device that will run off of -48v...

Hello, We have a two ring system that requires ~22 routers, utilizing ospf between routers, and vpls tunnels. There are two "hub sites" where the tunnels from each site will terminate. Dispersing several vlans to several devices. The the "hub" sites will have ~18 vpls tunnels (one to each remote sit...

I guess we read that page differently. When I read it, they have listed that the 2004 is compatible with 1G and 10G sfp modules (which if memory serves me right sfp's all are 1G or better). Then they go into detail on what the RJ01 supports, which they list that it only supports auto. But what its n...

Is this a silly question? Does mikrotik not support fixed rates on sfps?

Does anyone know of a SFP that will work with a CCR2004 that the port speed can be set to fixed 100m/full ? Ive tried several mfgs, and as the documentation says, RJ-01 will not do fixed rates. I have a customer thats standing their ground on 100m/fixed, and am trying to accomodate. Any suggestions?...

I upgraded our system to 6.44.3 a few weeks ago. My "hub" router is a rb1100AHx4 dude edition that runs also the dude. After a few weeks of running, the routeros and http services on every device that utilized them timed out. Ping, and the other dude services worked, as well as the ospf and mpls ser...

What is a stable/reliable trap manager then?

I've been using the dude because its on standalone hardware, not associated with a computer. And it will poll snmp traps, just not work as a manager where it can just accept them.

I have a couple of pretty extensively setup snmp monitoring systems using a few mikrotik routers. I have snmp polling setup, but the one thing I cant seem to figure out, is how to make the dude act as a "trap manager" where it reacts when a snmp message from a device is sent to it (outside of pollin...

The VPLS MTU is the size of the MTU you want to hand off to your customer. The interface MTU should be set to accommodate the overhead of VPLS. You need at least 1530 to send an 802.1q tagged frame through a VPLS tunnel. https://wiki.mikrotik.com/images/3/35/MTUVPLS.png Take a look at this MUM pres...

Ive done some path costing, and optimized routes to that extent, and considered how that will be affected in the event that a path is down. Recently I found that rp-filter was set to strict, which upon researching I have found to be more desireable to use loose. Changing so seems to of remedied the ...

Sorry for my paint skills, or lack there of. My physical network layout is below. What I need is the redundancy of being able to use ANY route available to get where it needs to go, while also still being smart about it, and using the the least amount of hops. (They are all wirelessly connected, som...

mikeeg02 - Quoted fix is for CCR devices, not for the CRS. Does the same problem persist on 6.42rc version? Please test this if possible. If problem persist, then contact support. Im not sure why I said CRS, it is a CCR1009. My mistake, I'm about half sick. What was addressed with the tile improvem...

RouterOS version 6.41.4 has been released in public "current" channel! !) tile - improved overall system performance and stability ("/system routerboard upgrade" required); If you experience version related issues, then please send supout file from your router to support@mikrotik.com. File must be ...

While different. This sounds similar to what I'm experiencing. Router A cannot ping router F, but I can ping router F using router A as a gateway. Router A can establish a vpls tunnel to router F. There are some oddities that didn't present themself in 6.38.5 for me. I changed some path costs and ma...

I'm not sure where to put this question so here goes. I've built a vpls network using mikrotik equipment (3011s and CCRs) that goes across the state using PTP microwave links,(26 sites/routers all together) using single 172.16.0.0/29 subnets per interface link. Everything was completely stable on 6....