That's not new, is it? I guess the real issue is that ROS 7 does not have a long-term release channel.MikroTik pushes a release to the 'stable' channel far too early, when it is often anything but stable.....
That's not new, is it? I guess the real issue is that ROS 7 does not have a long-term release channel.MikroTik pushes a release to the 'stable' channel far too early, when it is often anything but stable.....
Nice, no more workarounds with script!*) dhcpv4/v6-client - added check-gateway parameter;
Any chance this fixes interface flapping which occurs when directly connecting to specific devices, like AVM 6591?*) ethernet - improved interface stability for RB4011 devices;
https://help.mikrotik.com/docs/display/ ... Propertiesany documentation ? example ?Code: Select all*) wifi - added multi-passphrase (PPSK) support (CLI only);
Of course local forwarding exists in new wifi capsman. It is the only supported forwarding mode.Local forwarding - does not exist in the new one
The newer Linux Kernel in v7 no longer has a routing cache. In some usecases it provided big performance gains.And lo and behold on the same 1Gbps internet link with same configuration, same and pretty simple firewall rules, v6 is 50% faster.
Wifi roaming is only possible within the same SSID.I tried to roam to another SSID
Do you realize that the old wireless driver is still available with 7.13+ and even used by default for hap ac2?(with version less then or equal to 7.12)
I guess you are not using the wifi-qcom-ac driver package.where everyone are concerned the freeHDD space, mine is 924Kb
It is sequentially tried until the MAC address matches. In your case the first one always matches, it is working as designed.According to the docs, access lists should be sequentially tried until a match is found, but that doesn't seem to be working in this instance.
Your screenshot also shows "b" protocol on channel 100 and "ac" on channel 6. This is obviously incorrect.Most likely LinSSID is wrong.
That shouldn't be the case. Wild guess: Are you maybe using different vlan configurations on your APs? In that case your issue might be related to ft-preserve-vlanid setting.at least on my experience, enabling FT does not allow to successfully roam (which is a bit counter-intuitive).
None of my devices is suffering from random reboots, so this is probably dependant on your specific configuration.I guess MikroTik now must focus on the random reboots issue...
It's not unusable, it is required for managing ax devices via capsman.when an RB4011 (or any device) is upgraded from 7.12.1 to 7.13, an unusable WiFi menu is added.
No, the provisioning setting only defines where a provisioning rule is used. Downgrading only happens if you set band in channel properties.But does that mean the ax device run only on 802.11ac, so the hAP ax2 speed 'downgrade' to ac level ?
That would be misleading as there can be multiple master interfaces. I think it should be kept as master/slave, from a technical perspective it's perfect naming and immediately clarifies the relation between these interfaces.You asked for a proposal: main interface instead of master interface.
You could also provision static interfaces and then overwrite the channel directly in interface settings. This way you don't need too many provisioning rules.You can either set channels manually (which would require a provision rule per radio)
*cough*this is a mission critical network
[...]
Of course I have no backup of the config.
Issue on layer 8I wasted the whole afternoon trying to get down from 7.13 but there was no way, not even to 7.12.1
I guess this is fixed in 7.14, changelog says menu was renamed.you "lose" the functionality of winbox remembering the window settings for your wireless menus... because apparently it confuses the old and new wireless menus,
Nice, thank you!*) bridge - try to set wireless bridge ports as edge ports automatically;
> :put ([/tool fetch url="http://upgrade.mikrotik.com/routeros/NEWESTa7.stable" as-value output=user]->"data")they may have changed the address.
You can't use station bridge mode between old wireless and new wifi driver, it requires the same driver on both sides. This is documented in the manual.Station bridge mode - the radio does not connect
It's not useless, it can be used as Capsman to manage devices using new wifi driver.WiFi is always there, but useless?
This is not a good idea, 10 SSIDs on the same radio will waste a lot of airtime just for sending out beacons.
- Multiple SSID's minimum 10
Use wifi analyzer (https://play.google.com/store/apps/deta ... fianalyzer) on an Android phone or find a similar software for iphone.@whatever: Any recommendations for confirming the actual iPhone XS Max Hotspot 5Ghz frequency in use?
Probably some proprietary extension of the standard from qcom.400Mb/s maximum data rate in the 2.4GHz band for IPQ4019 interfaces
Maybe try clamping TCPMSS in firewall?there are actually several websites that will simply not load anything or take a loooooong time (and multiple attempts) loading.
Support is/was added in ROS 7.13.Our APs are cAP AC which I don't think meet the requirements for that anyway.
Due to the memory leak in beta2 you should keep your winbox connection closed whenever possible and maybe reboot to reclaim any leaked RAM.although as you can see it has few RAM [ ... ] resources left
No it wasn't, see https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hGVVAQVdEOs ;)Betamax was better than VHS ;)maybe because is-is performans is a bit better
Try to disable it.RRM enabled
Fix for what issue?Fix for WiFi will be in 7.11 so stay at 7.8
This feature would be nice to mitigate the removed route cache when upgrading from ROS 6.ipv6 fasttrack support please
The hap ax2 case is completely open on one side, you are basically looking at the exposed black heatsink with only some hints of plastic casing around it.Why can a hap ax2 with stronger cpu and new wifi fit into a 120x101 casing.
Apparently it's vulnerable to CVE-2022-45313 and CVE-2022-45315Are there any noteworthy bugs in latest v6 versions?
I can now answer my own question: Speedtest.net mobile app on 1x1 clients shows ~300 Mbps download speed, 2x2 client gets up to ~550 Mbps. 80MHz channel width on 5GHz.How is hap ax2 performance with wifi5 (ac wave2) clients?
One more reason to provide a stripped down "wifiwave2-light" package for hAP ac²/cAP acall your CAPsMAN network will have to consist of AX devices (or more specifically, any devices with wifiwave2.npk driver)
Do you know about Safe Mode?I have locked myself a couple of times when modifying network settings, and it is a bit annoying.
NoneWhat wifi roaming features does CAPsMAN provide?
It's very handy to connect to a mobile network in case your wired internet connection is interrupted. No need to reconfigure your WiFi interface, just plug in an Android phone, enable USB tethering and you are good to go.What does a regular home owner need a usb port for ?? Just asking?
Capsman does _not_ offer any features related to roaming. The roaming experience with capsman is identical to roaming without capsman.Also for me excellent experience with CAPsMAN and wireless roaming, I have no falls during voip calls and switching from one cAP to another.
No. It doesn't matter what you do with incoming packages to port 8080, but your NAT rule applies to outgoing internet traffic as well.so 8080 must be free for speedtest.net to work .
The old revisions of hap ac2 did ship with 256 MB RAM, the only thing preventing wave2 installation is the limited storage space.Storage is not an issue but RAM is, Qualcomm ath10k requires 256MB of RAM for two radios.
Holy sh*t, these are pleasant surprises.
!) added support for IPv6 NAT (CLI only);
[...]
*) added bridge HW offload support for vlan-filtering on RTL8367 switch chip (RB4011, RB1100AHx4);
But only with the standard wifi drivers, not with wifi-wave2 drivers.I have Caps-man on RB4011 (Ros 6.47.10) and i can control without problem the wifi on Chateau with ROS 7.
This is not going to happen, best case scenario with mikrotik 2x2 ac on 80Mhz channel is 300-400 Mbps.My Wish is to see 400 - 700....
That is great news. Will this include IPv6 fasttrack to allow firewall usage?Exactly. L3 HW for IPv6 is on the roadmap.
Well, they are called Cloud Router Switch, after all.Isnt it a bit weird that now Mikrotik Switches can route and filter/nat much faster than actual Mikrotik Routers ? :)
That's not how IPv6 works.And when I do go IPv6, I am convinced that will only be as far as my public IP and the rest of my internal lan will still be IPv4 based so not to worried.