Community discussions

MUM Europe 2020

Search found 67 matches

by lordzar
Fri Jun 21, 2019 4:28 pm
Forum: RouterBOARD hardware
Topic: RBLHGR success story
Replies: 5
Views: 1100

Re: RBLHGR success story

Very incredible speed! I'm thinking that if LHG could has gigabit ethernet, you can get a little bit more. Ping times (and specially ping jitter) indicate that there's other activity on the same LTE cell and it's questionable if OP could really get higher speed ... at least not during same day time...
by lordzar
Fri Jun 21, 2019 4:19 pm
Forum: RouterBOARD hardware
Topic: RBLHGR success story
Replies: 5
Views: 1100

Re: RBLHGR success story

Sorry for the delayed response, but here is the data from my router. I have not seen random disconnects. The connection stays up for weeks at a time. Most of the resets are me or the power. On the farm we lose power more than you would think. [dave@LTE_Dish] /tool sms inbox> /interface lte info lte1...
by lordzar
Fri May 24, 2019 5:47 pm
Forum: RouterBOARD hardware
Topic: RBLHGR success story
Replies: 5
Views: 1100

RBLHGR success story

I've been using Mikrotik since ~2000. I am retiring to a farm and it is in typical "rural america". There is no "highspeed" wired options. There is ADSL from the local phone company that runs 3M/500K D/U for $50/month. Yes.. a whopping 1/2 M up and it's unreliable to say the least. T-Mobile has allo...
by lordzar
Sun May 12, 2019 4:27 am
Forum: General
Topic: Can't receive SMS on RBLHGR
Replies: 0
Views: 247

Can't receive SMS on RBLHGR

Not totally true. I only receive sms messages if I "set receive-enabled=n ; set receive-enabled=y " If I just have "receive-enabled=y" nothing happens when a new message is sent to it's phone #. Only when I turn it off then back on do I receive pending messages. Anyone else with this issue or have a...
by lordzar
Wed Sep 12, 2018 2:16 pm
Forum: General
Topic: Hate new firmware versioning
Replies: 2
Views: 459

Hate new firmware versioning

So now the firmware version updates with EVERY release. This really bugs me. I only want it to update IF there is a change. So as of right now, why don't they just make firmware updating part of the upgrade process instead of having it be a 2 part process if they aren't going to seperate versioning???
by lordzar
Wed Dec 20, 2017 6:41 pm
Forum: General
Topic: Can't mark packets from named VPN interface?
Replies: 5
Views: 523

Re: Can't mark packets from named VPN interface?

I understood where you were going with that.. but that's the problem. Traffic DOESN'T match on the the VPN interface name. I've tried every path, input, prerouting, etc, but nothing is matching on the vpn interface name. Matches on a "real" interface just fine.
by lordzar
Sun Dec 17, 2017 6:30 pm
Forum: General
Topic: Can't mark packets from named VPN interface?
Replies: 5
Views: 523

Re: Can't mark packets from named VPN interface?

Just a standard l2tp-(server/client) connection. Routing between 192.168.1.X and 192.168.2.X MT2 is a NAT from the ISP, not externally addressable. I want to use the public on MT1 to access Server1. The port forward to Server1 is straightforward and does hit MT2 just fine, the debug log even shows t...
by lordzar
Sun Dec 17, 2017 6:41 am
Forum: General
Topic: Can't mark packets from named VPN interface?
Replies: 5
Views: 523

Can't mark packets from named VPN interface?

I have multiple ISP's and typically put in mangle rules for input and output so that packets leave on the same interface they came in on. I am trying to do that with a VPN tunnel that has been named. The idea is that I have a nat rule on a remote router so when a connection to a certain port on it's...
by lordzar
Fri Mar 24, 2017 4:12 pm
Forum: General
Topic: CAPsMAN auto frequency
Replies: 39
Views: 28694

Re: CAPsMAN auto frequency

Last month I officially reported issues with capsman and 2.4 while 5g was working fine. They didn't seemed surprised, so I believe they are aware of it. I wish they would resolve it soon, because I have a client with a high density AP configuration of 25 access points that I would love to put under ...
by lordzar
Fri Mar 24, 2017 4:00 pm
Forum: General
Topic: Mikrotik in enterprise company
Replies: 7
Views: 2292

Re: Mikrotik in enterprise company

Well, I'm in the U.S.and have a north east regional bank where I maintain their voip network between 30 branches, all using rb1100's, and another client that is a nation wide mortgage lender, where I've got 60 rb1100's handling data and sip trunking and 2 ccr's in the main data center, vrrp, and 1 g...
by lordzar
Thu Mar 09, 2017 2:39 am
Forum: General
Topic: New IP address on DHCP release
Replies: 10
Views: 2930

Re: New IP address on DHCP release

Any client or another mikrotik router as client?
by lordzar
Sun Feb 26, 2017 4:26 pm
Forum: Beginner Basics
Topic: How do I connect to IP 0.0.0.0?
Replies: 13
Views: 6019

Re: How do I connect to IP 0.0.0.0?

Something else you can try is to log into the one you that you do have access to, and try to connect to the others from it using:

/tool mac-telnet
by lordzar
Wed Jan 25, 2017 6:32 pm
Forum: General
Topic: Feature request: change dynamic nat rule printing default
Replies: 1
Views: 357

Feature request: change dynamic nat rule printing default

I would like to propose making the printing of dynamic nat rules to NOT be the default. I resent having to use "print where !dynamic" in order to see info I don't want to see. I would rather have to say "print dynamic" when I do want to see them. There are a few networks that I manage with upnp on a...
by lordzar
Mon Jan 23, 2017 3:39 am
Forum: Beginner Basics
Topic: Remote access over Internet to a Mikrotik without public IP
Replies: 3
Views: 2098

Re: Remote access over Internet to a Mikrotik without public IP

Put something behind it, like a raspberry pi, and run 'ngrok'

I have done this.
by lordzar
Mon Jan 23, 2017 3:37 am
Forum: Beginner Basics
Topic: DNS at each site?
Replies: 17
Views: 2074

Re: DNS at each site?

I strongly suggest to not do this (redirect all queries to your resolver). Your customers may have good reasons for using other resolvers. And even if they don't, ISP should provide internet access and not decide for users what they can a can not use. Can you give me a good example of why not to do...
by lordzar
Tue Jun 03, 2014 5:37 am
Forum: General
Topic: VLAN TAG UNTAG ON CLOUD SWITCH
Replies: 3
Views: 2254

Re: VLAN TAG UNTAG ON CLOUD SWITCH

Everyone refers to that wiki article... But I'm guessing its people that haven't tried the examples. They don't work the way you would expect them to work.
by lordzar
Fri May 30, 2014 3:54 pm
Forum: Beginner Basics
Topic: Mikrotik Ipsec tunnel between multiple sites
Replies: 2
Views: 1059

Re: Mikrotik Ipsec tunnel between multiple sites

Routing on ipsec is overly complicated and not intuitive. You need separate policy entries for all the remote subnets or a supernet policy, in order to tell the ipsec engine what the "interesting traffic" so that it will route thru the tunnel. And don't forget the nat bypass rules so the remote netw...
by lordzar
Sun May 25, 2014 7:18 am
Forum: Wireless Networking
Topic: CAPs Manager
Replies: 165
Views: 57855

Re: CAPs Manager

There is a global config, which affects all managed ap's, then you can add specific configs for certain ap's, that would allow you to config channels individually.

I want them to support "auto" channel in the global config,
by lordzar
Wed May 21, 2014 6:05 pm
Forum: Wireless Networking
Topic: CAPs Manager
Replies: 165
Views: 57855

Re: CAPs Manager

I am doing an office building that is old, concrete and steel construction. Very little signal penetration from room to room.

We are planing 24 low power ap's and would really like to be able to set auto channel in caps-man.

Any word on when it will be added.???
by lordzar
Sat May 10, 2014 10:37 pm
Forum: General
Topic: Logging web traffic to remote webserver
Replies: 33
Views: 10338

Re: Logging web traffic to remote webserver

First thing I see is that your logging rule says "remote" and not "remotelog"
by lordzar
Tue Apr 01, 2014 7:32 am
Forum: General
Topic: v7.0 Released! (april fools joke)
Replies: 11
Views: 3112

Re: v7.0 Released!

Forgot to put "all bugs fixed"
by lordzar
Mon Mar 31, 2014 9:09 am
Forum: Beginner Basics
Topic: upnp issue
Replies: 7
Views: 1762

Re: upnp issue

Make sure there is only one type external defined in your upnp config

Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk
by lordzar
Mon Mar 31, 2014 2:09 am
Forum: Beginner Basics
Topic: upnp issue
Replies: 7
Views: 1762

Re: upnp issue

When things "should" be working what happens when you issue "/ip firewall nat print dynamic" ?
by lordzar
Sun Mar 30, 2014 10:07 pm
Forum: Beginner Basics
Topic: IPSEC not working?
Replies: 21
Views: 3029

Re: IPSEC not working?

A couple of things... Not sure why the use of aggressive mode instead of main mode. Aggressive is mostly used when you are using dynamic policies. Also... Sa's don't get established until there is "traffic of interest", so, if you are just typing "/ping 192.168.10.1" it will not work. The source add...
by lordzar
Sun Mar 30, 2014 9:53 pm
Forum: Beginner Basics
Topic: upnp issue
Replies: 7
Views: 1762

Re: upnp issue

You have no upnp interfaces define as internal.
by lordzar
Sat Mar 29, 2014 4:47 pm
Forum: General
Topic: DNS server doesn't work if ipsec works
Replies: 4
Views: 1159

Re: DNS server doesn't work if ipsec works

Actually... You do not have to renumber your networks. What you are doing is called supernet routing. It's when the local network is included in the scope of the tunnel. All you need to do is add another policy that the source and destination are the same and make it a higher priority. If you need a...
by lordzar
Thu Mar 27, 2014 1:22 pm
Forum: Beginner Basics
Topic: Cannot access to router after putting firewall filter
Replies: 4
Views: 1090

Re: Cannot access to router after putting firewall filter

Don't forget... Next time... Control-X is your friend.

Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk
by lordzar
Wed Mar 19, 2014 7:36 am
Forum: Beginner Basics
Topic: VLAN help
Replies: 22
Views: 3375

Re: VLAN help

I think your problem is that the LAN port are mastered to ether2.

You are trying to config port 5 as if it was independent. When you master ports together only the master port is configurable.
by lordzar
Sun Mar 16, 2014 5:49 pm
Forum: Wireless Networking
Topic: bad signal @ 2km 2xParabolic
Replies: 6
Views: 1416

Re: bad signal @ 2km 2xParabolic

Stronger signal is not always better. Imagine someone standing right next to you shouting in your ear. You might be able to make it out but it would be better if they lowered their voice. Same thing with radio. There is a sweet spot for radio signals. Too weak or too strong is not good. Sent from my...
by lordzar
Sun Mar 09, 2014 4:09 am
Forum: Wireless Networking
Topic: is this true?? 30 kms with SXT??
Replies: 17
Views: 3106

Re: is this true?? 30 kms with SXT??

Maybe using a parabolic reflector.

Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk
by lordzar
Thu Feb 27, 2014 4:25 pm
Forum: General
Topic: Banging my head trying to configure Cloud Switch CRS125-24
Replies: 10
Views: 2169

Re: Banging my head trying to configure Cloud Switch CRS125-

Yet another case of them putting out potentially good hardware without having the software to back it up.

STOP MAKING HARDWARE... FIX THE ROS. GET IT STABLE.

uggggg... this is soooo frustrating.

Hire another company to develop the software since you can't seem to get it done right.
by lordzar
Sat Feb 22, 2014 1:36 pm
Forum: General
Topic: Known issues and bugs - a list
Replies: 283
Views: 113355

Re: Known issues and bugs - a list

Let's try this again... (Someone deleted my previous post) I agree with everyone on "we're sick and tired of all the bugs". They really need to hire someone who is experienced in software QA testing. It is beyond ridiculous now. Mikrotik seems to introduce just as many new bugs as the ones they fix ...
by lordzar
Mon Feb 10, 2014 5:15 am
Forum: Beginner Basics
Topic: RB951-2n Prioritizing Avaya IP Phone traffic
Replies: 3
Views: 1645

Re: RB951-2n Prioritizing Avaya IP Phone traffic

Is the routerboard "the" router or is it behind another one. I'm asking because you mentioned Nat behind a firewall.

If it is behind another firewall and traffic can go around the router board I to the same router, then QoS on the rb might be a moot point.



Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk
by lordzar
Fri Jan 31, 2014 5:18 pm
Forum: General
Topic: Known issues and bugs - a list
Replies: 283
Views: 113355

Re: Known issues and bugs - a list

There is an issue where routeros can not talk to sshd servers that have challenge/response turned on.
by lordzar
Fri Jan 31, 2014 5:13 pm
Forum: General
Topic: Strange SSH anomaly
Replies: 3
Views: 766

Re: Strange SSH anomaly

The best thing to do is apply the firewall rules that block ssh attempts after a couple of failed logins.

The rule set is in the wiki somewhere.

I have it on all my routers so that I can access from anywhere but blocks others after 3 failed logins.
by lordzar
Tue Jan 28, 2014 9:27 am
Forum: General
Topic: VRRP duplicate packets
Replies: 4
Views: 1202

Re: VRRP duplicate packets

Mis-configuration?

Duel masters?
by lordzar
Thu Jan 23, 2014 8:11 am
Forum: Beginner Basics
Topic: Need help replacing a Fortigate with MikroTik
Replies: 5
Views: 2075

Re: Need help replacing a Fortigate with MikroTik

Something along the lines of: Create a list of good addresses: /ip firewall address-list add address=24.12.4.2 list=goodguys add address=24.12.4.4 list=goodguys add address=24.12.4.6 list=goodguys Then, allow those hosts, but block everything else. /ip firewall filter add action=accept chain=forward...
by lordzar
Tue Jan 21, 2014 7:49 pm
Forum: Beginner Basics
Topic: Need help replacing a Fortigate with MikroTik
Replies: 5
Views: 2075

Re: Need help replacing a Fortigate with MikroTik

So far you have an x.x.x.x./27 on your wan interface. Just add a /32 within that /27 onto the same wan interface then just program your src/dst nat rules accordingly just using that /32 as the src or dst address. Then you can map everything to a single host or break up the ports to multiple hosts ju...
by lordzar
Mon Jan 20, 2014 9:42 pm
Forum: General
Topic: need web browsing log
Replies: 4
Views: 1518

Re: need web browsing log

The short of it is:

1) activate the proxy server on the router

2) redirect the http traffic thru the proxy server

3) send the proxy server logs to a syslog server.
by lordzar
Wed Jan 15, 2014 12:33 am
Forum: Beginner Basics
Topic: Vlan basic problem
Replies: 8
Views: 1528

Re: Vlan basic problem

Well... just from looking at the example in the first post...

I know it's only a test... but I'm a little confused that you are using vlan 1 in the 1st sample and vlan 2 in the second...

anyway... in the bridged version... you want the /ip addr on the BRIDGE and not the vlan interface.

-Dave.
by lordzar
Sat Jun 22, 2013 5:25 pm
Forum: General
Topic: RouterOS 6.1 released
Replies: 198
Views: 55516

Re: RouterOS 6.1 released

I took 2 CCR's and put them side by side with 6.1 installed. Ran a cable between 2 of the ports.. .and set up IPSEC. EPIC FAIL ! Submitted a ticket and got back "We have a known IPSEC problem in 6.1" Really?? At this stage in the game.?? I still can't put my CCR's in production on my Gig fiber link....
by lordzar
Thu Mar 21, 2013 12:47 am
Forum: Virtualization
Topic: MetaROUTER on RB1100AHx2
Replies: 18
Views: 8773

Re: MetaROUTER on RB1100AHx2

So.. you are saying that Krisjanis lied to me... told me a non-truth.. ??

If that is the case... Why would you discontinue the 1100AH and not have something to replace it with that can do metarouters like it can?
by lordzar
Wed Mar 20, 2013 12:59 am
Forum: Virtualization
Topic: MetaROUTER on RB1100AHx2
Replies: 18
Views: 8773

Re: MetaROUTER on RB1100AHx2

Great news... I was just told that metarouters are supported on the X2. I couldn't get it to work... but I believe what I am told. :) And.. this was very important to me since they are discontinuing the RB1100AH which runs metarouters just fine. I've got 60+ deployed. They wouldn't get rid of a rout...
by lordzar
Fri Mar 15, 2013 1:03 am
Forum: RouterBOARD hardware
Topic: No more 1100AH wth?
Replies: 0
Views: 576

No more 1100AH wth?

I was just told by my distributor that the RB100AH is discontinued. What the hell? It's being replaced with the 1100Hx2 ?? why?? there is already an AHx2 who needs yes another multicore router that can't do metarouters. I have over 60 RB100AH's deployed and they ALL do metarouters. I've sent email t...
by lordzar
Tue Jan 08, 2013 10:14 pm
Forum: RouterBOARD hardware
Topic: CLOUD CORE ROUTER
Replies: 1374
Views: 1021688

Re: CLOUD CORE ROUTER

Same SFP issue.

Unplugged from a media converter and plugged into SFP port on CCR and no luck.

uggg...
by lordzar
Fri May 25, 2012 3:24 am
Forum: Virtualization
Topic: Metarouter stability on RB800, RB1100, RB1100AH
Replies: 42
Views: 14197

Re: Metarouter stability on RB800, RB1100, RB1100AH

I have been running metarouters in RB450's and RB1100 for quite a while now on older versions of course. The debugging issue is that when I attach to the console of a metarouter and start configuring it, every command i complete, such as adding a bridge, creates a message on the console instead of j...
by lordzar
Thu May 24, 2012 10:21 pm
Forum: Virtualization
Topic: Metarouter stability on RB800, RB1100, RB1100AH
Replies: 42
Views: 14197

Re: Metarouter stability on RB800, RB1100, RB1100AH

I am running about 8 RB1100's and 14 RB1100AH's each with 2 metarouters The typical config is for a remote office: 3 MB bonded T1 Internet Cable modem The 3m is for SIP trunking and backup internet, cable is primary internet. the metarouters are setup to handle QOS'ing on each of the ISP links. IE: ...
by lordzar
Thu May 24, 2012 9:52 pm
Forum: General
Topic: RB1100 is powerful enough to connect to 1 Gb/s and BGP?
Replies: 6
Views: 1324

Re: RB1100 is powerful enough to connect to 1 Gb/s and BGP?

I am using a Roc Box Core router from roc-noc.com

It's a 1-U x86 router running RouterOS

It is handling our 1Gig link.

http://www.roc-noc.com/mikrotik/routerb ... -core.html
by lordzar
Fri Mar 23, 2012 10:45 pm
Forum: General
Topic: ipsec policy dump ??
Replies: 0
Views: 407

ipsec policy dump ??

How do you see the routes that an IPSEC connection has up?? The info in the wiki is WRONG: Dumping Policies It is possible to dump policies installed into the kernel for debugging purposes with command: /ip ipsec policy dump-kernel-policies After executing this command check the logs to see the resu...
by lordzar
Tue Jan 24, 2012 3:05 am
Forum: General
Topic: 512 SIP bug !
Replies: 0
Views: 461

512 SIP bug !

After upgrading from 5.11 to 5.12 all of my SIP trunks broke.

Downgrading to 5.11 corrected the issue.

I could find no work arounds in 5.12

This issue and the supout files have been submitted to Mikrotik.
by lordzar
Tue Jan 24, 2012 3:03 am
Forum: General
Topic: 5.12 upgrade warning !
Replies: 0
Views: 662

5.12 upgrade warning !

This is a follow-up to my original post: http://forum.mikrotik.com/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=57209 If you upgraded to 5.10 or 5.11 and had your meta-routers change all their ports, ie: ether1 became ether3, etc... then be careful when upgrading to 5.12. They did fix the issue, but if you've changed the po...
by lordzar
Tue Jan 24, 2012 3:00 am
Forum: General
Topic: v5.9 upgrade WARNING!!!!
Replies: 8
Views: 1747

Re: v5.9 upgrade WARNING!!!! (FIXED)

The port enumeration problem has been fixed in 5.12
by lordzar
Wed Dec 14, 2011 4:49 pm
Forum: General
Topic: Can Someone Help me test a 100meg connection?
Replies: 5
Views: 1875

Re: Can Someone Help me test a 100meg connection?

Ok... send an email to dave1gb at gmail.com
by lordzar
Wed Dec 14, 2011 8:39 am
Forum: General
Topic: Can Someone Help me test a 100meg connection?
Replies: 5
Views: 1875

Re: Can Someone Help me test a 100meg connection?

You can contact me and we can schedule a date/time for your test.

I have a Mikrotik as my core router on a 1GB link.
by lordzar
Mon Dec 12, 2011 9:44 pm
Forum: General
Topic: v5.11 released
Replies: 173
Views: 45577

Re: v5.11 released

2 updates in the last week and no fix for the metarouter interface enumeration problem?
by lordzar
Thu Dec 01, 2011 4:27 pm
Forum: General
Topic: v5.9 upgrade WARNING!!!!
Replies: 8
Views: 1747

Re: v5.9 upgrade WARNING!!!!

The prior release was 5.8

Also... I just checked it on another router that has 3 meta's running and they ALL enumerated wrong!
by lordzar
Wed Nov 30, 2011 10:59 pm
Forum: General
Topic: v5.9 upgrade WARNING!!!!
Replies: 8
Views: 1747

v5.9 upgrade WARNING!!!!

you can lose connectivity to your router, under certain circumstances, if you upgrade to v5.9 I have an rb1100 that uses a metarouter for qos. After upgrading, remotely i might add, after the reboot, all the ethernet ports in the qos vm enumerated to all different names. I'm am expecting the 2 ports...
by lordzar
Sun Oct 09, 2011 2:11 am
Forum: General
Topic: l2tp tunnels with multiple internet connections issues
Replies: 11
Views: 4476

Re: l2tp tunnels with multiple internet connections issues

Yes... mangling and having route rules does work... IF you know the address of the remote.

But in the case of a remote office that gets its address from DHCP, it doesn't help.

I wish it would just track the l2tp traffic like any other traffic.
by lordzar
Fri Sep 30, 2011 8:19 pm
Forum: RouterBOARD hardware
Topic: RB750GL reboots with metarouter FYI
Replies: 2
Views: 836

RB750GL reboots with metarouter FYI

So, I have several RB750GL's running meta routers, most running 5.2 I went to install a new one and upgraded it to 5.7 and it would randomly reboot a couple times a day. So I downgraded to 5.6 and had the same thing happened. Then I downgraded to 5.5 and it seems stable. (read: up more that 1 day) J...
by lordzar
Sun Sep 18, 2011 9:30 am
Forum: General
Topic: Optical Fiber.
Replies: 6
Views: 2778

Re: Optical Fiber.

My router is mounted right next to my hp procurve switch that has SFP+ ports, so I just use a mini-gbic fiber transceiver and configure a vlan to a copper port and use the switch as a media converter.
by lordzar
Tue Aug 23, 2011 5:39 am
Forum: General
Topic: NOT TO DO. Weird instalations?
Replies: 386
Views: 240380

Re: NOT TO DO. Weird instalations?

Here is a router the United Parcel Service just delivered.

I guess "Fragile" wasn't written on the box!

:D
by lordzar
Mon Aug 15, 2011 5:52 am
Forum: General
Topic: l2tp tunnels with multiple internet connections issues
Replies: 11
Views: 4476

l2tp tunnels with multiple internet connections issues

I have a router at the main office with 3 isp's with many l2tp tunnels coming in. The issue is that the incoming tunnel has to be over the isp that has the default route on the router, OR with a route->rule that sends it over another isp. I have tried putting in mangle rules on the input/output chai...
by lordzar
Thu Nov 11, 2010 10:28 pm
Forum: General
Topic: [Solved] VRRP: Bug in ROS 4.11
Replies: 18
Views: 4267

Re: VRRP: Bug in ROS 4.11

What is the time frame for all the new releases?? 4.12, 5.0???
by lordzar
Wed Nov 26, 2008 9:46 pm
Forum: RouterBOARD hardware
Topic: Rb433 power off and dont back.
Replies: 11
Views: 3339

Re: Rb433 power off and dont back.

I have this EXACT problem with RB450's. I have a dozen or so in the field and, maybe, 3 or 4 of them behave this way. If you loose power briefly, they do not come back up. No lights... no sign of life. Is there a field engineering fix I can apply?? solder a drain resistor or something somewhere??
by lordzar
Mon Sep 08, 2008 8:39 pm
Forum: General
Topic: bridging, nat'ing, private/public ip's, firewall, 1 router?
Replies: 3
Views: 811

bridging, nat'ing, private/public ip's, firewall, 1 router?

|--Ether1--->ISP Class C | |--Ether2--->192.168.1.x private lan | |--Ether3--->Public Class C servers (with FW rules) All ports are bridged WITH bridge fw turned on and MASQ for the private address. Can this be done? Because the problem is .. with bridge fw turned on all of it's traffic gets nat'd. ...
by lordzar
Sun Aug 31, 2008 8:13 am
Forum: General
Topic: Anyone have a v2.8 rb500 image?
Replies: 2
Views: 751

Anyone have a v2.8 rb500 image?

If anyone has an V2.8 RB532 image could you please email it to me.??

Thanks.

dave @ dcentral.com

I would appreciate it. I am trying to test a theory that something broke when 2.9 came out and it still hasn't been fixed.


:D