What do you mean shouldn't ???you should not use that as only defense,
you should use firewall rules to protect your management interfaces
What is this option for then ???
What do you mean shouldn't ???you should not use that as only defense,
you should use firewall rules to protect your management interfaces
Clear improvement regarding LT 6.44.6
What meen this? I dont understand.. Improvment or downgrade from what version? Explain.
You can share the source (url) of the changelog?IMG_20190910_001102_513.jpg
@donewareI imagine people are going to freak about this
Code: Select all/interface/ovpn-server/server/set protocol=udp
RouterOS v7 betaafter installing this release on CRS317 lost connectivity via SFP
SFP page shows only module present
after downgrading to 46beta38 SFP shows all info, signal strenght but no link
You are not posting the full list of changes.I don't fly into space, though![]()
correctedYour image is corrupted![]()
confirmFile from 159.148.147.204 is corrupted.
https://159.148.172.226/routeros/6.44.5 ... 6.44.5.zip seems ok.
Try using Mozilla Firefox to download a netinstall 6.44.5The [netinstall-6.44.5.zip] seems corrupted, please confirm ..thanks
https://download.mikrotik.com/routeros/6.44.5/netinstall-6.44.5.zip
It is enough to lay out the full list of changes v6.44.5 relative to 6.43.16 long-termkarlisi, it is hard to judge about proper and improper ways for changelogs syntax. However, we will try to improve it for the next versions, thank you for the report.
I confirmStatic host route is very unreliable in this release. I have a web server that I need to reach through another gateway and it works sporadically.
I didn't count but it works approx. 30 seconds and then a timeout for 30 seconds and so on.
/ip neighbor discovery-settings
Corrects a memory full error.
I did it both ways......... will i have to watch something happens after or just install and go on? What exactly do this package? The scipt is other way to install it or is the only way?
problem(
Create a rule in input chains for ipsecupdated a CCR1009 from 6.43.12 to 6.44 -> Lost connectivity on all eoip (ipsec) interfaces.
Hi there,
I see v6.44rc doesn't have the IPSec policy option to "tunnel" as compared to the previous versions eg. v6.43.2.
Why is this?