Since Cube 60G ac and Cube 60Pro ac are different devices.Are you shure about that? nRay works muuuuuuch better at 66960. Cube should be the same
Cube 60Pro ac = 802.11ay
Cube 60G ac = 802.11ad
Perhaps 66960 is a more efficient frequency
Since Cube 60G ac and Cube 60Pro ac are different devices.Are you shure about that? nRay works muuuuuuch better at 66960. Cube should be the same
What's new in 7.13beta2 (2023-Nov-14 13:04):
Your GPS works on Cube Pro 60ac ???Great, the 1h delay feature is awesome. Whats about GPS? Found no option in WebFig
Hiwhy is there such big latency on PTMP setup ? anyone has a knowledge ?
I took apart two CubeG-5ac60ay devicesInstalled 1 week ago.
Unit is completely shorted out.
Very sadInstalled 1 week ago.
Unit is completely shorted out.
YesHi all,
it's possible to disable all LEDs and GPS?
Thanks!
I want to wait for a response from Mikrotik and supportPoor sealing is not for pouring rain ....
Poor seal in the centerWhat a timing, I've just installed the Cube60Pro for the first time (a client, with the plan to replace the wAP60 sector with the CubeSA 60Pro) and now read this thread.
@enlace101
it is dead and replaced by another one... I understand that you will suffer the same problem
So the vulnerability is relevant in v6.49.8 ????
For Mikrotik employees to pay attentionWhy duplicate posts?
StrongSwan Android Client 2.3.3It works for me between StrongSwan 5.9.8 on Ubuntu and RouterOS
Please send or post supout.rif file. Maybe we can see a little more from the file
Two quick questions about containers:
1) are veth interfaces mandatory, or can host networking be used?
2) the docs state that ext4 is supported, is this new? Any plans to add ext4 support to Disks > Format Drive?
There are some changes in the .fwf files (RouterBoard Firmware) but that's it.
viewtopic.php?t=184711#p923967Missing RouterOS configuration after a reboot on very rare occasions
Something strange with multicasti was using accept in dst address in NAT for local ip tv to make ip tv see all users ip address after update to 6.48.6 i cant open ip tv downgade fix it or remove accept rule and use !dst address in Masquerade rule, what makes this happen ?
What do you mean shouldn't ???you should not use that as only defense,
you should use firewall rules to protect your management interfaces
Clear improvement regarding LT 6.44.6
What meen this? I dont understand.. Improvment or downgrade from what version? Explain.
You can share the source (url) of the changelog?IMG_20190910_001102_513.jpg
@donewareI imagine people are going to freak about this
Code: Select all/interface/ovpn-server/server/set protocol=udp
RouterOS v7 betaafter installing this release on CRS317 lost connectivity via SFP
SFP page shows only module present
after downgrading to 46beta38 SFP shows all info, signal strenght but no link
You are not posting the full list of changes.I don't fly into space, though
correctedYour image is corrupted
confirmFile from 159.148.147.204 is corrupted.
https://159.148.172.226/routeros/6.44.5 ... 6.44.5.zip seems ok.
Try using Mozilla Firefox to download a netinstall 6.44.5The [netinstall-6.44.5.zip] seems corrupted, please confirm ..thanks
https://download.mikrotik.com/routeros/6.44.5/netinstall-6.44.5.zip
It is enough to lay out the full list of changes v6.44.5 relative to 6.43.16 long-termkarlisi, it is hard to judge about proper and improper ways for changelogs syntax. However, we will try to improve it for the next versions, thank you for the report.
I confirmStatic host route is very unreliable in this release. I have a web server that I need to reach through another gateway and it works sporadically.
I didn't count but it works approx. 30 seconds and then a timeout for 30 seconds and so on.
/ip neighbor discovery-settings
Corrects a memory full error.
I did it both ways......... will i have to watch something happens after or just install and go on? What exactly do this package? The scipt is other way to install it or is the only way?
problem(
Create a rule in input chains for ipsecupdated a CCR1009 from 6.43.12 to 6.44 -> Lost connectivity on all eoip (ipsec) interfaces.
Hi there,
I see v6.44rc doesn't have the IPSec policy option to "tunnel" as compared to the previous versions eg. v6.43.2.
Why is this?