Community discussions

Search found 10 matches

by ilovepancakes
Sat Sep 07, 2019 6:21 pm
Forum: General
Topic: Sonos across VLANs?
Replies: 15
Views: 4971

Re: Sonos across VLANs?

So - I needed to do this and was able to get it to work. I made a little script. You can edit the first 4 lines and copy/paste the whole thing and the rest is taken care of. First: You need to download the additional packages for your version, then install the "multicast..." package and reboot. Thi...
by ilovepancakes
Sun Aug 25, 2019 4:37 pm
Forum: General
Topic: Sonos across VLANs?
Replies: 15
Views: 4971

Re: Sonos across VLANs?

I recently implemented the same for Sonos by using igmp-proxy not PIM. Just need to add the interfaces into igmp-proxy and set which one is upstream, then apply the firewall rules for allowing UPnP traffic. That's it. According to Mikrotik Wiki igmp proxy is slightly lightweight than PIM, that's wh...
by ilovepancakes
Fri Aug 23, 2019 10:48 pm
Forum: Beginner Basics
Topic: Simplifying my forward chain? [SOLVED]
Replies: 6
Views: 680

Re: Simplifying my forward chain? [SOLVED]

1) Fasttrack doesn't work for everything. I don't use it, so I'm not very good with it, but I read somewhere that even fasttracked connections need to let some packets take the normal path. 2) Yes. And if source address is 192.168.0.0/24, so no spoofing from LAN will be possible. There's no referen...
by ilovepancakes
Fri Aug 23, 2019 5:32 pm
Forum: Beginner Basics
Topic: Simplifying my forward chain? [SOLVED]
Replies: 6
Views: 680

Re: Simplifying my forward chain? [SOLVED]

- fasttrack established,related - accept established,related,untracked - drop invalid - accept from LAN interface and 192.168.0.0/24 to WAN interface and not to NotPublic - jump to vlan80>LAN (where you allow what should pass) - jump to vlan70>LAN (same as previous) - accept dstnatted if not from N...
by ilovepancakes
Fri Aug 23, 2019 4:25 pm
Forum: Beginner Basics
Topic: Simplifying my forward chain? [SOLVED]
Replies: 6
Views: 680

Re: Simplifying my forward chain? [SOLVED]

Safer (and sometimes easier) way is to construct a list of explicitly allowed connections and drop the rest at the end. Your current one is the opposite: drop watever you thought it should be dropped and (implicitly) allow the rest. Any way you do it, there's an essential rule missing in your curre...
by ilovepancakes
Fri Aug 23, 2019 4:08 pm
Forum: Beginner Basics
Topic: Simplifying my forward chain? [SOLVED]
Replies: 6
Views: 680

Simplifying my forward chain? [SOLVED]

New to RouterOS and below is my forward chain. I am wondering if there is anyway to accomplish the below but simplify the rules into a lower amount. Mostly I am referring to the drop rules in the forward chain. Kind of like how the input chain just has a drop all at the end, is there a better practi...
by ilovepancakes
Fri Jul 19, 2019 4:44 pm
Forum: Scripting
Topic: User agent with fetch tool
Replies: 3
Views: 904

Re: User agent with fetch tool

I'm in the same boat and get the same error, did you manage to find a fix for this?

Cheers,
Tugsynz
No, unfortunately. I still don't believe there is a way to add or customize a user agent for requests, although I have not tried to do it again on the latest versions of Router OS.
by ilovepancakes
Sun Dec 16, 2018 6:17 pm
Forum: Beginner Basics
Topic: Hairpin NAT and DDNS (noob)
Replies: 12
Views: 4750

Re: Hairpin NAT and DDNS (noob)

Yup, masquarade for bridge to local subnet in src-chain did the trick. Thank you all.
Do you mind sharing your final full config for NAT rules? I am trying to get this working and am having similar issues as you originally described.
by ilovepancakes
Thu Oct 04, 2018 4:58 am
Forum: Scripting
Topic: User agent with fetch tool
Replies: 3
Views: 904

User agent with fetch tool

Using the following code to try and update my Google DDNS record with current IP, everything seems to work correctly with communicating with Google but Google returns a "badagent" error since the request needs to send a valid user agent to be accepted by Google. How can I set and/or customize a user...
by ilovepancakes
Thu Oct 04, 2018 4:39 am
Forum: General
Topic: Feature requests
Replies: 1160
Views: 208381

Re: Feature requests

Would like a way to be able to send user agent header with the fetch tool. For example, Google DDNS with Google Domains and other DDNS providers can accept IP updates through HTTPS get requests, but they need a valid user agent sent with the request. Right now, a script to do this returns a "badagen...