MikroTik

aerosmith9110

For those who are curious this is the response to me: Since you are using CRS328 as a power source to power daisy-chained Omnitik 5 PoE. CRS328 limits voltage when detecting hight inrush current which occurs when you connect second Omnitik 5 PoE. When you are using Powerbox (it has dump PoE injector...

aerosmith9110

Yup, the Atheros-based Mikrotik module supports auto-negociation, and just works.

I haven't seen any 'OEM' modules that are non-marvell based, so my experience may be different than yours. I tried them in CCRs and found that they're not worth the headache.

Great Thanks!

aerosmith9110

Most likely you have a module with a Marvell chipset. They don't do Auto-negociation (only work in 1000/full forced), same config required at the other end. Solution: Use the MTK copper module. Will save you a lifetime of headaches. I actually hard coded the 1gbps. still having the problem... you m...

aerosmith9110

Hi All, I am using a non MT SPF RJ45. Seems that everytime I reboot my router I need to reseat the SFP. Basically the router OS should already be running before you plug the copper SFP in for it to work. So, if you are remote and did a reboot then the copper interfaces would not come up.... Can anyo...

aerosmith9110

I hope it isnt bad ressurecting a thread.. Anyone successful modding crs328? Since it is dual voltage supply.. Anyone figured how many watts per powersupply ( boost converter) is needed?

Still planning if it is practical to do a 24v or 48v conversion..

aerosmith9110

Hi all, I am daisy chaining mikrotik devices basically from mt crs328-24p to another poe ap to another poe ap ( at this level poe shows short circuit even if there isn't any and won't power the device.) crs328-24p to power box to omnitik poe to another omnitik poe... Or powerbox to omnitik to omniti...

aerosmith9110

Start by reading this topic. Meanwhile think about your desired network topology and how it fits possible configurations ...

Tnx, will see if it covers my questions

and I already have a desired topology.

aerosmith9110

Hi All, Just need your input... I don't have any trunks or vlans now but I want to implement it... 1. Say If I start using vlan and since this is my first vlan would all my ports that is bridge automatically goes to vlan 0? 2. If there a way like to include all traffic to pass trough the trunk both ...

aerosmith9110

Hi All, I tried to search but couldn't find anything.. Perhaps wrong keywords.. Basically i need to have a best before date for the vouches i printed.. It is not validity aka when the users first logged but if the voucher wasn't used for a certain peroid of time. Say, i printed or generated the user...

aerosmith9110

Just fyi,
You could actually use the same port. Just point it to the same interface or bridge. Got it to work. Without any credential to either pppoe ot hotspot the connected device won't have internet.

aerosmith9110

the answer is put them in VLANs.

will try that. tnx

aerosmith9110

but I still need my initial question answered

the hotspot 2nd idea is just a backup. If I didn't want it centralized it would be much easier...

aerosmith9110

Interesting idea. Not tried but I'd imagine you will need VLAN so the PPPoE and Wireless network are separate. you can probably put them on the same interface without VLAN but that means running a DHCP server on this interface for hotspot users, while PPPoE users can also pick up an IP address from...

aerosmith9110

Hi All, Is it possible? Basically what I am trying to achieve is a centralized administration on both pppoe and hotspot. Basically I have a ccr1036 which i configured one of the ports to serve as pppoe and I want to connect multiple omnitik ( bridged ) as a chain on this port. Goal: the clients can ...

aerosmith9110

I think these could easily been avoided all by indicated in the spec sheet: Model: xxxxxxx Transfer speed via wireless link ( ideal condition ) 802 - 400mbps both directions TCP nv2 -100mbps both directions TCP nsextreme - 120mbps both directions TCP something like that. Then the customers would ha...

aerosmith9110

I think these could easily been avoided all by indicated in the spec sheet: Model: xxxxxxx Transfer speed via wireless link ( ideal condition ) 802 - 400mbps both directions TCP nv2 -100mbps both directions TCP nsextreme - 120mbps both directions TCP something like that. Then the customers would hav...

aerosmith9110

wow, I am in the customer service industry and even how irate the customer is, we were trained not to tell them to look for a solution elsewhere or tell them to do good on their threat... I was expecting response to mfr476 would be: Hi mfr476, We apologize that the product is giving you such a heada...

aerosmith9110

I think we should Will Be find a solution. We are better to mikrotik. We are very strong. We are the alternative to Big companies. We are democraticed internet. We are the future. If mikrotik can't solve this problem, we can solve it

Unless it is a hardware limitation.

aerosmith9110

I actually bought a couple LHG60 ( claim: The LHG60 can do 1Gbps full duplex actual throughput (both directions 1Gbps at the same time) but only for shorter runs, like under 2KM. ) despite already having bad exp with LHG 5ac. So, Yeah as much as I can get I would like mikrotik but if Mikrotik will h...

aerosmith9110

not sure if this shows up but this will solve my problem

aerosmith9110

Last couple of questions.. How about the LHG 60 why is it per claim able to do gigabit speed ( 1Gbps full duplex actual throughput (both directions 1Gbps at the same time) with basically the same hardware as the lhg 5 ac but just different frequency? Is this gigabit speed 802.11 or the other protoc...

aerosmith9110

Yes, I am not expecting more from these MT That is what I was expecting even before about the half of the 866mbps minus the overhead. But MT needs to fix the other 2 protocols to match or even exceed the 802.11. But what bothers me on the responses here it seems that they are not expecting it to pe...

aerosmith9110

during testing it was around 10 meters. anyway I got it to a max of 400mbps ( I was maxing out at around 36 to 38MBps for file transfer ) with the most ideal condition ( very low noise, tested from 20+ dbi to 60+ , 802.11, 1 big file transfer around 3 meters apart ) I guess the other 2 protocols ar...

aerosmith9110

Anyway, I will checking other hardware as I need something at least 500mbps. MT seems to be having issues with wireless ptp speeds as of the moment and seems that there is no solution yet.. https://forum.mikrotik.com/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=136002&start=250 Already bought a couple of b5 and b5c...

aerosmith9110

Thanks to you and all those responded. I was not expecting to achieve the 866 but somewhere in the 400s. never figured that it really far from that. This is my first time with ptp wireless thus me scratching my head. I thought it should be better with our aruba ap 225s but wasn't. Although I haven'...

aerosmith9110

Thanks to you and all those responded. I was not expecting to achieve the 866 but somewhere in the 400s. never figured that it really far from that. This is my first time with ptp wireless thus me scratching my head. I thought it should be better with our aruba ap 225s but wasn't.

aerosmith9110

So in real world result... What would be the best case UL/DL speed? 285Mbps - 649Mbps one way? how can I achieve the higher result? basically the transmitter are already side by side and made sure that there is no interference on the channel. " Lucky " means winning the silicon lottery or...

aerosmith9110

Several people have already said, you are not missing anything. Your expectation of the product is too high. Either use an LHG60 to get gigabit or you will have to deal with the connection you are getting. The fact you are gettin 800+ burst rates is impressive to say the least, especially in the co...

aerosmith9110

When you btest you should not btest on the devices, the CPU will max out, you should btest between other devices connected to both ends. - I took into consideration reg the maxing out of the cpu, I checked even at tcp my utilization is about only 20% on both ends. So i assume this isn't about the C...

aerosmith9110

anyone?

aerosmith9110

Welcome to the club. ARM and NV2 is not working well. Nstreme have the same problem. https://forum.mikrotik.com/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=136002 Only thing which works is 802.11. Mikrotik does not solve this problem :-(. To be sure, he does not even comment. It is very sad that in end of 2018 we need...

aerosmith9110

tnx but I am only seeing 100

and what is the difference between the 2? looks like same specs to me except the freq. and if you take a look at my signal quality interference isn't an issue nor the signal strength.

aerosmith9110

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4bWBmiZS5lk

is an example where in udp both ways is hitting 180mbps an tx/rx rate was 520/390-80 vs my 866 and I am getting only about 100mbps.

aerosmith9110

Man you can't have 95Mbps both down and up, it's too much perfect. You're bandwidth testing passing through a 100Mbps Ethernet for sure, or you have a queue set to 100Mbps. I am at 1gbps on both ends but traffic isn't passing through there cause i am using the built in bw tool of the MT devices its...

aerosmith9110

Use pure 802.11 not nstreme (nstreme/NV2 dont work good with ARM at this moment). ARM have much more power & easy can handle BT directly on device. I tried 802.11 and still I didn't reach the advertised 800gbps+. I only got like 200-300mbps max 1 way udp. if tcp both I am getting about 120mbps.

aerosmith9110

Ceee means 1 control channel plus 3 extension channels so a total of 80MHz, in fact your status screen shows 80MHz When you btest you should not btest on the devices, the CPU will max out, you should btest between other devices connected to both ends. Also the signals are much too high, which will ...

aerosmith9110

Hi All, I am almost sure that I configured something wrong... Here is what I done: Ptp is establishing link nsextreme 20/40/80Mhz Ceee Both units are side by side and isn't installed on the dish. they both have full bars. On status page: Seeing tx/rx rate: 866.6MBps - 80MHZ/2s/SGI But seeing on chan...

Search found 37 matches

Re: omnitik 5 POE daisy chaining.

Re: ccr1016-12s copper SFP question

Re: ccr1016-12s copper SFP question

ccr1016-12s copper SFP question

Re: CRS328-24P-4S+RM and 54VDC

omnitik 5 POE daisy chaining.

Re: Vlan Implementation from a bridge network

Vlan Implementation from a bridge network

Hotspot voucher best before date... How?

Re: Hotspot + pppoe in 1 port

Re: Hotspot + pppoe in 1 port

Re: Hotspot + pppoe in 1 port

Re: Hotspot + pppoe in 1 port

Hotspot + pppoe in 1 port

Re: ARM devices and NV2 protocol

Re: ARM devices and NV2 protocol

Re: ARM devices and NV2 protocol

Re: ARM devices and NV2 protocol

Re: ARM devices and NV2 protocol

Re: ARM devices and NV2 protocol

Re: Newbie: LHG 5ac only hitting 100mbps

Re: Newbie: LHG 5ac only hitting 100mbps

Re: Newbie: LHG 5ac only hitting 100mbps

Re: Newbie: LHG 5ac only hitting 100mbps

Re: Newbie: LHG 5ac only hitting 100mbps

Re: Newbie: LHG 5ac only hitting 100mbps

Re: Newbie: LHG 5ac only hitting 100mbps

Re: Newbie: LHG 5ac only hitting 100mbps

Re: Newbie: LHG 5ac only hitting 100mbps

Re: Newbie: LHG 5ac only hitting 100mbps

Re: Newbie: LHG 5ac only hitting 100mbps

Re: Newbie: LHG 5ac only hitting 100mbps

Re: Newbie: LHG 5ac only hitting 100mbps

Re: Newbie: LHG 5ac only hitting 100mbps

Re: Newbie: LHG 5ac only hitting 100mbps

Re: Newbie: LHG 5ac only hitting 100mbps

Newbie: LHG 5ac only hitting 100mbps