😭If there would be news, it would be in the newsletter, no?
no problem with 802.3ad on RB4011Bonding 802.3ad Problem :
after i upgrade to this version the Bonding 802.3ad not working ( or stop about 30s ) i have not change anything and it's work without any problem in stable version
RB4011, updated without problems.After updating in arm an RB4011 has stopped working, there is no response in any ethernet. Nor can I recover it with netinstall since the ethernet ports are not activated when pressing reset.
everything suits me, thanks again. CrossOver will release a new version soon, we will live even better.You already have native Web interface. What's wrong with it? Many macOS native app will not be much different, just no browser.
copying the Addressses.cdb from the working 3.19 to 3.20Winbox working, but impossible to Load the Addresses file....
rebuild for 64 bits in the development environment, I do not understand what's complicated.If it were that easy, we would have done itWhy don't just make a
no problem, i was connected to 5ghzAfter upgrade today to 6.45.6 (stable), i cannot connect to 5GHz.
set frame-lifetime=10ms on wlan1. in Winbox frame-lifetime=0.01And for a little update, I came back home after a few weeks and 5GHz is down.
Happened at around 24 days of uptime. (Still on 6.44.5).
0.01 perfect for wlan1! thxThis is an old thread.
I believe the correct value for 10ms is 0.01. Not 1.00.
As i said... the rsc file give me for 1.00 the value of 1s,
instead of 0.01 which give me the value 10ms
Hello Normis,Several days passed, still no replies and not a single email about this issue.
Is the RB4011 5GHz issue resolved?
something makes wlan1 fall, obviously not the correct processing of data from wlan1. If refer to patches from openwrt then multicast.The problem is with ipv6 multicast or with bridge on 5ghz?
yes, sfp is working. wlan1 not fix, disabling itself.These changes have been tested in stable channel, right?
Edit: installed on RB4011, (regular) SFP is detected and working.
test on 6.46beta16, wlan1 disabling itself. not fix6.45.2 *) wireless - improved 802.11ac stability for all ARM devices with wireless;
The sfp port does not work at 6.45.2, it is not possible to verify.6.45.2 *) wireless - improved 802.11ac stability for all ARM devices with wireless;
Yes, broken SFP !!!!, rechecked all the modules that I have.Upgraded my RB4011 (non wireless) and my fibre SFP stopped working. It's not even recognised.
there is a feeling that the gentlemen are changing wheels on the go. In the future, this method may tear off your hands.You are not posting the full list of changes.I don't fly into space, though
rts/cts disabling - not help.So why it fails when there's no clients at all? After a long period of idle?
5GHz is falling due to the fact that the client starts to reconnect frequently.
My observations show that rts/cts disabling may help. Still investigating.
the game with the multicast settings on the wlan interface does not give any result either. The problem is deeper .... it is enough to read how solved problems on the QCA9984 chip on OpenWRT in 2017-2018 yearMulticastIs your IPTV multicast or unicast?
yes, in 6.45.1 solve mac address, 5ghz down again and again.TimurA,6.45.1 didn't solve the problem.
did you reset wlan interface configuration? solved it?
reset wlan interface configuration@strods
I have same MAC adress on SFP+ and WLAN Interface 5G (QCA9984) ..... the 2.4GHz Interface has another MAC Adress.
The SFP+ Port is disabled, so do i need to do any changes/resets ?
hello, no problem on RB932, only RB941People who have RB932 - check, maybe there is a problem with lack of disk space ?
And sorry for bad English
A fundamental solution (on photo) to the 5ghz problem on the RB4011. + wAP ac.Maybe some can confirm this with the RB4011
Hello!, try test on 6.45beta62.This solutions not working for me:( 5GHz still randomly disappearing...I can confirm that when adaptive noise immunity is disabled at 5ghz, everything has become stable on 6.45beta54.
The month of May ends.No wireless settings combination works for me either - no matter what the card freezes after some hours where the only way to fix it is to reboot.
fine! thanks emils We are waiting for a stable branch.
*) rb4011 - fixed MAC address duplication between sfp-sfpplus1 and wlan1 interfaces (wlan1 configuration reset required);
You have the same situation, if after a short period does not appear SSID beacon frames, the wlan is disabled.I think that my situation is not the same. My CAP AC2 stops to work on 5GHz with any client. Every client does not see 5GHz SSID from CAP. And it can last for hours... not for seconds
generally strange behavior RB4011, I already do not understand anything. Support MT keeps complete silence.No, only ipv4. I disabled ipv6 in packages section.do you have ipv6 on rb4011?Hello TimurA,
3 chains not help for me, 5ghz still disappering...
I did another experiment with ipv6, turned off the access list in wifi and checked the reconnection from RB4011 to RB962 and back. While working stably. Miracles and only.Interesting find, good work.
Today I tested the hAP ac scheme (RB962) and wAP AC with ipv6, everything worked fine. Why so with RB4011 - I do not understand: (Interesting find, good work.
I will try to cut down ipv6, and conduct tests again.Nope. Also, I did not know about the duplicated MAC with SFP mentioned in the other thread, so it is running ok with the same MAC, but SFP is disabled.is ipv6 present on RB4011?
Hi pavlov,i have the same problem with hap ac and iphone x in 5ghz
RTSP,You looked like before a switch-> host, but not a bridge-> host.after 5 overloads, data appeared in the bridge! What's happening?
if I turn on the RSTP, the switch chip stops working.I just added all the necessary interfaces to the bridge.Very interesting, your switch chip works. I have a configuration through the bridge, and hardware offloading does not work .
Can you somehow customize the settings?
and you think that everything will work when a conflict of mac addresses with spf?Does anyone have a problem that the 5 GHz wireless adapter stops working in the 80 MHz [Ceee] band and at 5180 MHz?
TimurA, show in the screenshot of the winbox which table you have is empty. I will look at my equipment too. It seems to me that we are trying to solve various problems, but perhaps they are interrelated.
3 months have passed, no movement in solving the problem.I know its frustrating guys. I will say that the RB4011 router only model is very nice. The Wifi model, at the moment, is just not ready.
Yes, no what news. Three months have passed, and there is no solution and MT does not even think about solving this problem. Many people ask me whether to buy, I show them this problem. Draw your own conclusions.Any news?
+1i'd like to see someone test it in a Faraday cage, to avoid any radar interference.. i bet that will get the very same results.
I now agree. I am seeing strange behavior on the RB4011, but only with the new Apple devices. uggggg......
Chupaka, Silence, no answer.TimurA, what news? Did you get an email response?
Hello Normis. Good, we'll still waiting.The fixes are not released yet. They will be only in 6.44
Then why did it work in CAPSMAN? Logically, the iphone xs max was not supposed to work in any mode.Apple uses a new chip, so presumably, a new driver too. This new driver did not follow RFC recommendation in one fragmenting method.
floeff, No, it does not work, I checked already.One idea in case this really happens just without CAPsMAN: It sets a few defaults (e.g. WMM) that otherwise have to be set manually. Maybe it's related to that? Just a wild guess though...
datapatch installed in "Local Forwarding" and "Client to Client Forwarding".Is it CAPsMAN with local or remote forwarding? Does changing it change the picture?
RB3011 CAPsMAN -> RB962 AC dual stack ipv6 / ipv4. Already day everything works stably. If the same run without CAPsMAN, iPhone XS Max does not work in AC mode.Will try the disabling of the AC network as suggested in this thread, thanks for the suggestion.
yes, the problem is not solved on 6.43.8 5Ghz, dual stack ipv4/ipv6, it works very slowly, it even slows down the MacBook Pro 15 2017.I can confirm the same behaviour iPhone XS