useful as usualHopefully it was not dropped hard, and maybe some antenna broke inside 8-O
why would I want EOIP and not IPIP?Step 1: Switch to wireguard
Step 2: Use EOIP tunnel over the wireguard if you need more MTU
That's what I do, and works a treat.. but lots of manual config setup for each tunnel, not very scalable
and of course my routing table goes to hell and I can't use the 100.64/10 network for my purposes. the gateway IP is 100.0.0.1.100.101.198.98/8
of course it's an issue. miss-configuration, apparently (my default assumption). asking for help to debug it, and getting random shots in the dark or smirky unhelpful answers like yours.There's no right answer to a non-issue topic.
That one fits fine.
Welcome!
yet another extremely helpful answer, thanks!How can it be a bad config and barking at the wrong moon?
No way.
great idea, set it up & tested while my wife on call, exactly what I needed!Maybe it is better to use a queue tree. Its function is a bit different, but at least it is clear what it does (and it affects outgoing traffic only when applied to an interface).
oh, thank you, that's convenient! didn't notic the drop box.One thing you may have missed, in a static DHCP lease, you can still use a pool rather than a particular IP address if you find that useful. But you still need one lease per each "special" client.
thanksNo, interface counters are only reset on reboot. And they cannot be reset manually.
Only when you have a dynamic interface that would be removed when the link is down, e.g. an L2TP client, it would be reset.
notoriety? is this why you are rude to people?@gdanov, be happy, you have your moment of notoriety, keep it up, at least i hope people forget when at times i have been rude.
@Dude2048: Noticed.
you have problems with reading comprehension? or you have nothing useful to say so reverting to passive-aggressive provocative behavior? bullying your customers, not the first time I see you doing that.What is your question, gdanov? Or is there a suggestion in there somewhere?
not on that one. I run Dude on another router in the LAN. Interesting clue, that may be it...Do you run Dude on your router?
I don't get that. I capture my WAN IP in an address list which I don't use for any purposes currently AFAIK.WANIP or WANIP Gateway are the only things that come to mind.
YOu may have WANIPs in firewall address lists to remove.
It seems not to be dangerous (for most cards) because they would never go above the limit. Anyhow, it's the advised and only one method working for my card.I think it was "dangerous" to try setting higher tx-power than the calibrated one for certain old routers
thanks, this works, but I was always under the impression this is very dangerous to use.TryCode: Select all/interface/wireless/set 0 tx-power-mode=all-rates-fixed tx-power=0
oh, obvious reason.They need to add "four address frame support" into wifiwave2 before it will support bridging.
someone at MT could add "known problems" and reflect this in the changelog. Basic respect for your users.After update my RBM11G w/ R11e-LTE6 from beta5 to beta6 the LTE modem can't connect to BS. I'm downgrade to beta5 now.
and because you seem to approve of the beta rollout process probably can help me find the beta5 binaries so that I can downgrade from the latest UNTESTED betaDo you know what BETA is ?This "beta" thing has been absolute shitshow
Do you know what BETA is ?This "beta" thing has been absolute shitshow
I don't want to ruin the otherwise nice enclosure. I'd drilled holes in the top already otherwise. It's the best option to give some space to the 4 antennas I need to mountJust drill small hole for SMA there somewhere.