Community discussions

MikroTik App

Search found 7 matches

by Dudeplayz
Wed Jul 01, 2020 10:20 am
Forum: General
Topic: ROS cant reach the internet, Local clients can
Replies: 5
Views: 1116

Re: ROS cant reach the internet, Local clients can

Sorry for the late reply. I could solve it by supplying a default route without a routing mark. With the routing mark, the error is still there.
by Dudeplayz
Fri Aug 23, 2019 1:14 pm
Forum: General
Topic: ROS cant reach the internet, Local clients can
Replies: 5
Views: 1116

Re: ROS cant reach the internet, Local clients can

The passthrough is wanted because the rules working together to achive the wanted behavior.
by Dudeplayz
Wed Aug 14, 2019 3:57 pm
Forum: General
Topic: ROS cant reach the internet, Local clients can
Replies: 5
Views: 1116

ROS cant reach the internet, Local clients can

Hi, I have the problem that the mikrotik cant ping or reach any internet address. The local network is working fine and any client or server can reach the internet without problems. Only the mikrotik itself cant ping anything which is not in local network. It also cant resolve DNS. Here the firewall...
by Dudeplayz
Wed Apr 10, 2019 11:05 am
Forum: General
Topic: L2TP/IPSec - phase 1 negotiation failed due to send error
Replies: 7
Views: 9663

Re: L2TP/IPSec - phase 1 negotiation failed due to send error

sindy thanks First for your concrete answer. The Fritz!Box allows ESP forwarding, what i have done additional to the udp Ports. My problem with the Public ip is, that it is dynamic and is handled by dyndns from our Domain. The Other things i will try out the Next days. So here are the exports for th...
by Dudeplayz
Wed Apr 03, 2019 10:48 am
Forum: General
Topic: L2TP/IPSec - phase 1 negotiation failed due to send error
Replies: 7
Views: 9663

Re: L2TP/IPSec - phase 1 negotiation failed due to send error

No only the default routing table. But i use load balance over 2 WAN connections with some mangle rules. But they are configured to use for the same connection always the same WAN interface. And the incomming vpn connection is only available over one of both. Here are the rules: 0 ;;; Accept interna...
by Dudeplayz
Tue Apr 02, 2019 2:26 pm
Forum: General
Topic: L2TP/IPSec - phase 1 negotiation failed due to send error
Replies: 7
Views: 9663

Re: L2TP/IPSec - phase 1 negotiation failed due to send error

Firewall Rules: Flags: X - disabled, I - invalid, D - dynamic 0 X chain=input action=log protocol=udp in-interface=E6-WAN1-Fritz!Box log=yes log-prefix="Port-Log" 1 ;;; VPN L2TP UDP 500, 1701, 4500 chain=input action=accept connection-state=new protocol=udp in-interface=E6-WAN1-Fritz!Box dst-port=50...
by Dudeplayz
Tue Apr 02, 2019 12:13 pm
Forum: General
Topic: L2TP/IPSec - phase 1 negotiation failed due to send error
Replies: 7
Views: 9663

L2TP/IPSec - phase 1 negotiation failed due to send error

Hi, I've tried everything to find the Bug. From private network i can successfully connect to the VPN, but from the WAN side it isnt possible at all. I am getting the following errors in log: 10:37:35 ipsec IPSec: sendfromto failed 10:37:35 ipsec,error IPSec: phase1 negotiation failed due to send er...