Community discussions

MikroTik App

Search found 11 matches

by IntLDaniel
Thu Nov 25, 2021 3:04 pm
Forum: General
Topic: Change DSCP on DNS packet from LAN to Mikrotik? [SOLVED]
Replies: 6
Views: 447

Re: Change DSCP on DNS packet from LAN to Mikrotik? [SOLVED]

Eh, of course, input does not make sence :shock: :? Very thanks for this catch, of course I need to set DSCP values to replies from Mikrotik to clients and not to opposite! So the output chain is the point and now it works like a charm :)
by IntLDaniel
Thu Nov 25, 2021 2:38 pm
Forum: General
Topic: Change DSCP on DNS packet from LAN to Mikrotik? [SOLVED]
Replies: 6
Views: 447

Re: Change DSCP on DNS packet from LAN to Mikrotik? [SOLVED]

Thanks for testing I have already tested another service (SSH) an the same result as DNS. You you are probably right that ICMP is different case than others and I am watching the reply packet? The question now is if the packets from my LAN going to my Mikrotik really gets new DSCP or not? The intent...
by IntLDaniel
Thu Nov 25, 2021 1:38 pm
Forum: General
Topic: Change DSCP on DNS packet from LAN to Mikrotik? [SOLVED]
Replies: 6
Views: 447

Re: Change DSCP on DNS packet from LAN to Mikrotik? [SOLVED]

Thanks for reply. So current result with Packet Sniffer: * I can see there TOS values 56 on ICMP packets if my mangle rule for ICMP is active, if is disabled then NOT (TOS = 0) * for the DNS (udp/53) there is always TOS = 0 So for me the Torch has the same output like packet sniffer. So what is the ...
by IntLDaniel
Thu Nov 25, 2021 12:55 pm
Forum: General
Topic: Change DSCP on DNS packet from LAN to Mikrotik? [SOLVED]
Replies: 6
Views: 447

Change DSCP on DNS packet from LAN to Mikrotik? [SOLVED]

I am trying to change DSCP value on packets comming from my LAN to Mikrotik (ROS v6.49.1). I have these two examples in mangle: add action=change-dscp chain=input comment=\ "qos - change DSCP on ICMP traffic for FIREWALL" in-interface-list=LAN \ new-dscp=56 passthrough=no protocol=icmp add...
by IntLDaniel
Fri May 07, 2021 6:40 pm
Forum: General
Topic: DHCP Option 51
Replies: 5
Views: 778

Re: DHCP Option 51

Interesting...but clear to me why it does not work. Thanks!
by IntLDaniel
Fri May 07, 2021 6:24 pm
Forum: General
Topic: DHCP Option 51
Replies: 5
Views: 778

Re: DHCP Option 51

Thanks for reply. So you mean that option 51 (lease time) cannot be set via Option Sets and I HAVE TO use an option in static lease definition?
by IntLDaniel
Fri May 07, 2021 5:09 pm
Forum: General
Topic: DHCP Option 51
Replies: 5
Views: 778

Re: DHCP Option 51

I would like to know the same. It means, I am trying to set an option (code 51) for DHCP option set but it does not work for me. Static leases clients with selected option set still uses predefined lease time value from DHCP server. Maybe I do no know the right format for the time in that option? I ...
by IntLDaniel
Tue Sep 03, 2019 12:00 pm
Forum: General
Topic: [Feature Request] units labels on the WinBox graphs
Replies: 0
Views: 701

[Feature Request] units labels on the WinBox graphs

Would it be possible to make WinBox graphs (Tools/Graphing, Queue/Traffic, Interface/Traffic....) at least basicly useable - so put there some relevant units labels on X and Y axis? There is something better visible in WebFix but currently to most useable graphs are in mobile app ONLY! Thanks.
by IntLDaniel
Fri Aug 16, 2019 9:50 pm
Forum: General
Topic: Feature Requests: Port Lists, and Multiple address lists in a filter rule
Replies: 13
Views: 4212

Re: Feature Requests: Port Lists, and Multiple address lists in a filter rule

Could you @fmarais007 please post some code example how to use "multiple IP lists" in firewall rule using custom chain? I am not so much skilled in Mikrotik now...thanks. In my example I have several IP lists and I would like to make one srcnat rule for more IP address lists instead of rep...
by IntLDaniel
Thu Apr 04, 2019 7:30 pm
Forum: General
Topic: max Log Prefix length?
Replies: 0
Views: 580

max Log Prefix length?

What is the maximmum length for Log Prefix option? It seems that there is not limitation but only first 32 chars are vissible in log files?