Yes. It's a shame. Despite its faults dude is still a great tool. All these fancy web interface based monitoring tools are *uncomfortable* to handle.... And this answer I am getting about dude questions from mikrotik always. For many, many years.
You answered a 2013 postThis is crazy low. You should by all means inrease bandwidth or you'll run into problems. I would go with at least 100Mbits.
The bridge config seems to let the ethernet port itself work additional/as before without beeing part of the bridge.Thanks for your help.
Did just/only this and nothing changed:
add frame-types=admit-only-vlan-tagged ingress-filtering=yes name=bridge1 vlan-filtering=yes
What is the signal you calculated for this link?Which part of my post showed that i was unaware of what I'm doing?
clear los 400m excellent signal/aim.
device has to be reliable without disconnects on light /medium rain.
I don't get the defence over this product by you?
No. MT missed the step to 802.11ac. It does not work better than 11n with MT gear despite HW/CPUs are newer/better. NV2 is reliable but slow.Nv2 work well if we consider the old AP hardware (netmetal, sxt sa, ecc)
Of course. But for sure every generation was a big step forward. Not as big as announced but big.i think there is a lot of marketing hype around each new wifi generation, this causes a lot of confusion and excessive expectations
Or use high gain antennas with good isolation on short links.80Mhz is near impossible to pull off full performance outdoors in 5Ghz. You’d have to be in the wilderness 20 miles from any homes and well below the tree line.
No. But not sure if the packet loss with 100Mbit devices is solved.Is S-RJ01 also that troublesome?The older S+RJ10 are crap. Wrong DDM information, low MTU, ... There was a post showing newer with MTU size depending on negotiation speed. So it is guesswork and luck making it work ...
So if they negotiate down to 1G they no longer transport Jumbo Frames? Difficult to find the problem if that happens ...I can confirm my S+RJ10 module (R2 18/12/06 shown on label and R2.11 shown on SFP tab in ROS) allows jumbo frame of 9000 at link speed of 2.5Gbps.
Yes. Do a plain bridge and do no tagging then all packets go through.Hi!
Can you give me a hint on how to transfer ALL vlans through a LHG-Link? Do I have to configure the VLANs, or is it enough to leave "VLAN Filtering" disabled on the bridge?
Thank you for your help!
May take a while ...Mostly it's rain backup... OK I 'll wait for ubiquitiDoing backhaul + backup with one Antenna in one direction is not a good idea anyway.
There is hardware: https://wikidevi.com/wiki/List_of_802.11ax_Hardwareis there even any AC pci cards we could test on a routerboard?
Send report to email@example.com including .rif File.i update to 6.44 but when i wana use ip cloud sometimes about half of time i try "Error: request Timed out" what should i do?
It is announced for a while, not available. With this it is possible to jump from house to house with high speed. Given the high bandwidth several hops are possible.It's available for a while already. And it's not competition, given the limited range. more like "last mile" solution.
Still a waste of spectrum these days. Hope .ax shows up soon. >100M Capacity/10MHz is 2019.yeee single TCP stream 240 Mbit from 40 Mhz Mby in lab.This is not AC mode, AC mode will reach around 240Mbps on 40MHz
Codename: UnicornThat must be RouterOS v7 !!!I heard that they are releasing new version of RoS with airmax compatibility on 1 Apr 2019
Search the changelogs. Problem is solved.Any replies from Mikrotik support since Aug 2018?
RAM will not be the only problem. With this much routes the cpu will get problems with forwarding.Will not work, you need a lot more ram. Get something like a rb4011 or rb1100ahx4 at a minimum.
Sent from my SM-A520W using Tapatalk
We have seen snow is a killer for 60GHz. Even light snow fall killed our 1200m link completely.Shure it will work, but it drop every rain66000 GHz is working on 4000+. Tested in real life...
Sorry. Wrong topic.SW Version?I used the laptop to test the speed as I was getting only 250Mbps out of 1Gbps.
Found in changelog:
*) crs3xx - improved data transmission between 10G and 1G ports;
SW Version?I used the laptop to test the speed as I was getting only 250Mbps out of 1Gbps.
Still with newest beta? I see higher numbers.then You should expect slow speed from 10G to 1G port on the same switch, like 300mbps
We see the same on 800m with light snow fall. Seems 60GHz does not like snow. Link was down an hour. 5Ghz backup jumps in.Wait for first snow. Link is not working
Mikrotik - Why no radom for this LHG? Snow is death for a reflective surface
60 GHz is a high frequency with high oxygen absorption. The LHGs do a good job ...If that is the case I think I will send them back as not fit for purpose.
Yes. Signal should be better. 60GHz needs a lot of margin.I have setup a new 60Ghz link using 2 x LHG-60's bought as a kit, the link was good -64db over 840.44m but as soon as it rains the link goes down.
This ja a sfp+ Module.What can I do with this SFP module?
I plugged it into my RB2011 and I am thinking I can use it like another interface?
In IP Setting fastpath/fasttrack counters are "0".Hi.
Running the sniffer will disable fast path and fasttrack. If you have fp/ft enabled, then is a thing to look.
I would opt for an 1100AHx4 instead 3011. More cpu power and more power options.You definitely don't want to do it with a small CRS. Look at using a 3011 at smaller sites and CCR at others.
Done this? I fear as the BGP process is single threaded and eats a whole cpu of the CCR it may cause problems.On the BGP routers, turn on bgp redistribution then add only the wanted routes into ospf-out filter denying the others, so it will redistribute only those?
About 20 in addition to our internal routes (300).How many routes do you want to put in OSPF?
ROs v.6.42.6 , link up with low rain and wind 28 kts.
Notice no Tx-sector info in master device using winbox window, I must use monitor via terminal.
If I tryed to center the devices , RSSI value increses. I have a good RSSI without center the devices.
Did but failed ). Thanks. Using newer Winbox did the job.Upgrade to Winbox 3.14 and next time post the version number you are using. Or do some very basic research on the forum first.
Need some to replace these Ignitenets. A replaced link again causes trouble. Very low quality of components. Hopefully LHG 60 works from the beginning.All my Dealers say begin of June
This is what the radio-HW modulate. Not what you will see pushing traffic over the link.The SXts are hitting 300Mbps on full load
With only 5 clients you do not see the nv2 scaling problems.The backbone is 1 Omnitik for 5 clients
No and we will not get it. You only get it using a product where it is implemented. I need it, so I bought it.Does we have GPS sync in Mikrotik, that is what I talking about, I know the benefit, but we don’t have it!
+1Nstreme plus, any hints?
I'm about to update a couple of test units...
Please send supout to Mikrotik support.It happens every single time the router reboots. And due to a watchdog and other issues on this segment for some reason that seems to happen every day or two. So, each time I have to enable and re-enable for MPLS to function properly. BIG Issue.