Partly i have figured out that from 100/25 to 600/600 it is taking almost full 25upload speed >2.2MB/s
But the other way it is not...

Are both of the devices using the same ISP? I see your results from your work server is fine. I was just wondering if they are on the same ISP since there could be an issue with bandwidth limits on peering points between networks along the way if they are not on the same ISP. Different country :( d...

I see nothing that can be usefull on those screenshots, only angry red marker painting.
How did you do the bandwidth tests?

iperf above ^^

The wording is a bit off - he is downloading (100 mbps) from the second site (600mbps), so ideally it would be close to 100mbps in ideal/perfect situations.

Have you tried iperf3 between sites?

Above ^^

I gave up......
Did this tutorial
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rjn7z48HqYM
And same result...

IM more interested in that you understand the config vice copy and paste config.
More info on wireguard.
viewtopic.php?t=182340

Uff thx a lot to go through D:

traceroute 192.168.6.45
traceroute to 192.168.6.45 (192.168.6.45), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets
1 192.168.5.1 (192.168.5.1) 0.268 ms 0.217 ms 0.368 ms
2 172.16.2.1 (172.16.2.1) 64.749 ms 64.709 ms 64.863 ms
3 192.168.6.45 (192.168.6.45) 66.109 ms 66.091 ms 65.356 ms

I have good exp with WG on linux so i thought that on mikrotik it will work right away, but i guess bad firewall rules are source of the problem :( Nah. If firewall rules would have been the problem, throughput would be ZERO. Apart from network throughput on the intermediate steps, there are no dia...

With queues enabled 192.168.6.64 ----------------------------------------------------------- Server listening on 5201 ----------------------------------------------------------- Accepted connection from 192.168.5.192, port 39506 [ 5] local 192.168.6.45 port 5201 connected to 192.168.5.192 port 39508...

(1) okay........ (3) Yes, (4) There are better ways to address this. (5) Good to remove (6) Be accurate in allowed IPs, you should include 172.16.1.1/32 on the cient device and 172.16.1.2/32 on the Server device. One doesnt have to if one also needs internet access in a particular direction as it c...

What is not clear to me is which device is the peer and which is the server for the initial connection. Nor is it clear the use of the tunnel. Did you want to use the internet of the server from the peer........... Not seeing the configs, your complaints have no merit.............. Nor do I have an...

At least I can interpret it both ways. It's not clear. i have tested by fast.com one line 100/25 and second line 600/600 So when i download from second line to first line i should have 70Mbps easy. Anyhow, point I made as well is that whatever limit there is in place, WG should be able to get over ...

Observations Site B (600/600 assuming this is the client device??) (1) The bridge guest is not identified as belonging to any interface list? Could be on purpose. (2) For MT devices I typically use /24 for Wireguard IP address vice anything else (you have /30 and is fine) (3) Missing Keep alive on ...

No full wireguard config ?

What's the story with all the queues ?

Full wireguard config in screenshots? oO

Queues are only for local PCs wife,parents they take too much traffic :-E

SITE A 100/25 192.168.6.0/24 # may/01/2022 18:15:37 by RouterOS 7.2 # software id = H7WM-PZPA # # model = RBD52G-5HacD2HnD /caps-man channel add band=2ghz-g/n control-channel-width=20mhz frequency=2412 name=channel1 add band=2ghz-g/n control-channel-width=20mhz frequency=2442 name=channel2 add band=...

I hope there is no confidential data D: SITE B 600/600 192.168.5.0/24 # may/01/2022 18:15:11 by RouterOS 7.2.1 # software id = EU0G-52A4 # /caps-man channel add band=2ghz-b/g/n name=channel_2g add band=5ghz-a/n/ac name=channel_5g add band=2ghz-b/g/n name=channel_2g_guest /interface bridge add admin-...

I am very sorry to everybody for poor info. I really thought that there is some checkbox and all will work correctly.
I will perform bandwidth test between routers and will prepare full config exports.
P.S. The transfer is from 600/600 to 100/25

I see nothing that can be usefull on those screenshots, only angry red marker painting.
How did you do the bandwidth tests?

xD i like red colors xD
By using fast.com

A pity you spend time on these screenshots... Config export is done using terminal /export file=anynameyouwish. Then review file contents for sensitive info and post between [ code] quotes. And you did not answer my other question either. How do you know you got 70mbps end to end both ways ? Most l...

post configs of both devices.......

I have grayed out wireguard routes for know until i figure out why its not working, will use IPSEC

Greetings,
i am sure i have something wrong. Two hap ac^2 routers
I am using IPSEC with speed 15Mbps, when i turn ipsec off and use wireguard it is 9Mbps.
The throughput of the connection between sites is 70Mbps.
What could be wrong? MTU 1420, tryed with 1400 same results

So what i have done as i have spare mikrotik lying around, so i put my PC with the server that i wanted to limit to one router and all other network to another router. I made seperate subnet for the second router and now its 5x faster than routing on 1 router, but 4times slower than regular switch c...

The cpu is 100% and the traffic is 90MBit from previous 900MBit. The question is, is it possible to put some firewall rule,masquarade,etc to make it fast as before? It might be possible (I wouldn't hope for miracle though, RB951G is no beast) ... but you have to post full config of your router (as ...

So i have done that a little bit different, i didnt want to change the whole interface subnet, so i created additional address with a seperate pool to 192.168.7.0. The cpu is 100% and the traffic is 90MBit from previous 900MBit. The question is, is it possible to put some firewall rule,masquarade,et...

Thank you very much for your time and fast reply! Good idea with subnet, Will try that, i mark as answered as i feel that will work :) Thank you very much,take care! Basic reason why it doesn't work for you is that traffic within same subnet is switched and not routed. In your particular case it's h...

Greetings, can somebody help me? i have mikrotik RB951G-2HnD , ROS4 6.42.6 I am trying to limit interface local bandwidth without result. I read all 3 pages in every google possible result,tryed the first things and nothing helped. I was trying per IP queuing nothing and marking packets and connecti...

Omg, god bless developers, waiting for the WIREGUARD so much !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!, subscribed for the updates !