In the first tests I am doing, I am finding it impossible to establish a vpnv6 session against the Route Reflector.*) bgp - added initial vpnv6 support;
Two of the features that I most expected in the same release. Great news!*) bgp - added initial vpnv6 support;
*) dhcpv4-relay - added VRF support (CLI only);
This problem was also pesent in ROSv6.This is quite interesting as this problem did not occur in RouterOS v6
Great news!*) ethernet - improved packet CPU core classifier for Alpine CPUs for non IPv4/IPv6 traffic;
Can Tilera CCRs distribute L3VPN traffic between multiple cores? I have found it impossible to achieve on ARM and ARM64 devices.the key thing is that this was tens of thousands of sessions in L3VPN
You should ask Support.When the problem with the absence of the following path attributes in bgp update will be fixed:
1. EXTENDED_COMMUNITIES
2. MP_REACH_NLRI
The problem affects only routers based on the ARM64 architecture.
I can´t find the "where" clause in export command.*) console - added "where" functionality for "export" command;
show mpls l2transport vc 2020 detail
Some kind of mechanism to import/export routes from one vrf to another within same router
I prefer mature protocols :)
A protocol from 1992. Why not change to OSPF
I asked about this here viewtopic.php?p=1009237#p1009237, but the answer was a joke.Hi,
Can I please get some more detail about this? Link to RFC, forum topic, etc?
*) mpls - improved MPLS TCP performance;
My question is because I can't understand the relationship between the transport protocol TCP and MPLS. As far as I understand, MPLS is agnostic of the protocol present in the transport layer.It works better now :)What can this mean?Code: Select all*) mpls - improved MPLS TCP performance;
*) mpls - improved MPLS TCP performance;
Maybe it is enabled by default like in ROSv6.*) mpls - added FastPath support;
how to activate the this feature?
thx
I meant to use blackholes to publish prefixes in BGP.I might have misunderstood the point but what "scheme" are you referring to?
Any plans for fix broken VPN4 bgp reflection ?
MT was able to fix the BGP issue on my router using a 7.99 release and soon the fixes will be available in 7.7beta.
thanks to all the MT team
neighbor 192.168.250.1 suppress-signaling-protocol ldp
cisco-id=192.168.250.1&12345:600
Thanks for the info. Have you tried BGP signaled by VPLS?Awesome, have already started labbing 7.2.0, interesting though seems like L3VPN with route reflector still not working correctly, can see my routes dancing to a beat here https://streamable.com/3b8y3j
There are 3 things I think would round out the routing stack for MikroTik after they get ROSv7 stable and look at new features
1. IS-IS
2. EVPN
3. SR-MPLS w/ TI-LFA
Hi @mrz, is the VPNv6 implementation in the roadmap for RouterOS V7?Since we now have IPv6 VRF support, I do not see the reason why not.
Yes, we are using this feature in production in RouterOS v6.How about v6, does it work well?
We need to wait...stil is beta version
Hi mrz, are the plans to implement VPNv6 in ROS v7 maintained?Most likely you will see this implemented in ROS v7.
MPLS deployment status for v7.1rc4 has not been updated at https://help.mikrotik.com/docs/display/ ... col+Status.Any specific improvements to MPLS or BGP?
Also, the system shows MPLS label assignment.!) enabled initial MPLS support (CLI only);
Nobody knows if there is a way to obtain similar information that the Cisco command returns?Thanks mrz, there is a way to obtain an output similar to the one obtained in Cisco with the following command:
"show ip bgp vpnv4 vrf VRF1 neighbors x.x.x.x advertised-routes"