Community discussions

MikroTik App

Search found 25 matches

by nexusds
Tue Aug 11, 2020 9:31 pm
Forum: General
Topic: CRS354-48P-4S+2Q+ traffic problem on ports 1 to 8
Replies: 183
Views: 29162

Re: CRS354-48P-4S+2Q+ traffic problem on ports 1 to 8

Curious.. I am not able to replicate it as often as before.. but for anyone who can see it happen a lot, i had a thought.. can you try reducing the CPU frequency in routerboard settings?
by nexusds
Sat Aug 08, 2020 2:33 pm
Forum: General
Topic: CRS354-48P-4S+2Q+ traffic problem on ports 1 to 8
Replies: 183
Views: 29162

Re: CRS354-48P-4S+2Q+ traffic problem on ports 1 to 8

Folks - I'm watching this thread as someone with a CRS354 that I simply want to use as a switch rather than a router. Out of interest, for those of you currently using the switch, are you using RouterOS in the absence of SwitchOS for the device or is it the routing capability you need? No agenda, j...
by nexusds
Mon Aug 03, 2020 5:30 pm
Forum: General
Topic: CRS354-48P-4S+2Q+ traffic problem on ports 1 to 8
Replies: 183
Views: 29162

Re: CRS354-48P-4S+2Q+ traffic problem on ports 1 to 8

There were changes added to 6.48beta12 that address this issue, and it fixed the problem for some clients, these changes are also present in 6.47.1. But if you are still experiencing issues with the aforementioned versions, please contact us at support@mikrotik.com or via our support portal https:/...
by nexusds
Thu Jul 23, 2020 2:42 am
Forum: General
Topic: CRS354-48P-4S+2Q+ traffic problem on ports 1 to 8
Replies: 183
Views: 29162

Re: CRS354-48P-4S+2Q+ traffic problem on ports 1 to 8

+1 Have this problem too, but on ports 16-24. CRS354-48G-4S+2Q+ I have tried on all ROS versions. Port state is UP, but no traffic passthrough to bridge. Only reboot can help. Have you done firmware as well as package update? if you still have the issue on 6.48B12, please email a supout file to sup...
by nexusds
Wed Jul 22, 2020 5:35 pm
Forum: General
Topic: CRS354-48P-4S+2Q+ traffic problem on ports 1 to 8
Replies: 183
Views: 29162

Re: CRS354-48P-4S+2Q+ traffic problem on ports 1 to 8

now I am running ros7.1b, we will see.......
7.1b only has 6.47.1 fixes.. please try 6.48b12
by nexusds
Tue Jul 21, 2020 5:11 pm
Forum: General
Topic: CRS354-48P-4S+2Q+ traffic problem on ports 1 to 8
Replies: 183
Views: 29162

Re: CRS354-48P-4S+2Q+ traffic problem on ports 1 to 8

even with ros 6.47.1 is problem still present
Use 6.48beta12.. all 6.47.x has the issue for sure.
by nexusds
Tue Jul 14, 2020 7:16 pm
Forum: General
Topic: CRS354-48P-4S+2Q+ traffic problem on ports 1 to 8
Replies: 183
Views: 29162

Re: CRS354-48P-4S+2Q+ traffic problem on ports 1 to 8

i installed v6.48beta12 at a customers location yesterday. today switch group 9-16 is completely dead. even after a reboot there is no activity on this ports anymore. connection is detected but no packets passing through. constant 0bps. which model is this and did you update routerboard firmware as...
by nexusds
Fri Jul 03, 2020 5:30 am
Forum: General
Topic: CRS354-48P-4S+2Q+ traffic problem on ports 1 to 8
Replies: 183
Views: 29162

Re: CRS354-48P-4S+2Q+ traffic problem on ports 1 to 8

Just curious, with anyone having the issue on ports 1-8, if you move those to 9-16 (swap the groups).. do you still see the issue on the first group or does it now move to the new group?
by nexusds
Mon Jun 29, 2020 11:39 pm
Forum: General
Topic: CRS354-48P-4S+2Q+ traffic problem on ports 1 to 8
Replies: 183
Views: 29162

Re: CRS354-48P-4S+2Q+ traffic problem on ports 1 to 8

today tried flapping ports one by one did not help.. had to flap all ports in the affected group and the same time to get it back working. this also throws out the auto-recover possibility. its just random at this point.
by nexusds
Fri Jun 26, 2020 7:16 pm
Forum: General
Topic: CRS354-48P-4S+2Q+ traffic problem on ports 1 to 8
Replies: 183
Views: 29162

Re: CRS354-48P-4S+2Q+ traffic problem on ports 1 to 8

Beta 7 MAY be resolving the issue by automatically flapping the ports. by the time we had the issue it had corrected itself. although at the same time one device in the port group had rebooted which caused a flap of the one port.. so not sure which one made it work again. will report on any info. al...
by nexusds
Thu Jun 25, 2020 9:42 pm
Forum: General
Topic: CRS354-48P-4S+2Q+ traffic problem on ports 1 to 8
Replies: 183
Views: 29162

Re: CRS354-48P-4S+2Q+ traffic problem on ports 1 to 8

Update;
routeros-mipsbe-6.48beta5 does not fix issue
while ports are affected per controller (8 sequential ports), its not always ports 1-8, can be 9-16 or 16-24, etc

latest test beta routeros-mipsbe-6.48beta7 was handed out this morning.. will implement and test this evening
by nexusds
Thu Jun 11, 2020 9:17 pm
Forum: General
Topic: CRS354-48P-4S+2Q+ traffic problem on ports 1 to 8
Replies: 183
Views: 29162

Re: CRS354-48P-4S+2Q+ traffic problem on ports 1 to 8

agreed, although I moved more critical stuff off those ports I havent seen the issue with 6.48B5.

email support@mikrotik if you want to test the file.
by nexusds
Fri Jun 05, 2020 4:02 am
Forum: Announcements
Topic: v6.47 [stable] is released!
Replies: 349
Views: 93703

Re: v6.47 [stable] is released!

another bug ... when going under IP/IPSec/Policy, and opening an existing one seems to exit winbox/crash winbox.
by nexusds
Wed Jun 03, 2020 9:28 am
Forum: Announcements
Topic: v6.47 [stable] is released!
Replies: 349
Views: 93703

Re: v6.47 [stable] is released!

CRS326-24S+2Q+ - seems fine overall, but couple of ports connect to IScsi ports @ 10G to MSA 2040. keep flapping at random times using MW-S-+DA003 (use this for all connections except Q+ for this switch and never had an issue before). will try hard-coding to 10G and see how that goes (luckily not us...
by nexusds
Wed Jun 03, 2020 7:23 am
Forum: Announcements
Topic: v6.47 [stable] is released!
Replies: 349
Views: 93703

Re: v6.47 [stable] is released!

Upgraded a number of switches and routers without issue except (so far) a RB3011UiAS. this one used interface lists for bridges and rules pointing to lists. the bridges seemed to act fine and dhcp client setup to WAN bridge. IP was obtained but NAT rule pointing to 'WAN' interface list did not work ...
by nexusds
Mon May 25, 2020 9:47 pm
Forum: General
Topic: CRS354-48P-4S+2Q+ traffic problem on ports 1 to 8
Replies: 183
Views: 29162

Re: CRS354-48P-4S+2Q+ traffic problem on ports 1 to 8

Has anyone confirmed if cooling the device more helps and/or if the fans are installed the wrong way and/or the CPU heat sink is poorly mounted? just wondering if software vs hardware fix is needed. never opened up the chassis, but maybe part of the controllers for ports 1-8 are close to the CPU and...
by nexusds
Mon May 25, 2020 9:26 pm
Forum: General
Topic: CRS354-48P-4S+2Q+ traffic problem on ports 1 to 8
Replies: 183
Views: 29162

Re: CRS354-48P-4S+2Q+ traffic problem on ports 1 to 8

Is this problem present only on the PoE version?
same issue on non-poe version
by nexusds
Mon Mar 30, 2020 6:05 pm
Forum: General
Topic: SIP attacks and whitelist
Replies: 2
Views: 2094

Re: SIP attacks and whitelist

Change the add SIP Trial to exclude the SIP Hackers as you dont need to keep adding them to Trial if they are already in the Hacker List
by nexusds
Wed Mar 25, 2020 5:43 am
Forum: General
Topic: Feature Request: IPv6 NAT support
Replies: 18
Views: 5016

Re: Feature Request: IPv6 NAT support

+1
multi homed system needs to be able to retain one physical IPv6 address and NAT to a backup system for clients
by nexusds
Fri Jan 17, 2020 7:11 pm
Forum: Announcements
Topic: v6.46.2 [stable] is released!
Replies: 121
Views: 34002

Re: v6.46.2 [stable] is released!

anyone else notice Tile units CPU temperature go much higher after this update?

NVM - was a coincidence with a maintenance on environments
by nexusds
Thu Sep 26, 2019 7:03 am
Forum: General
Topic: RouterOS v7.0beta1 (ARM)
Replies: 203
Views: 61367

Re: RouterOS v7.0beta1 (ARM)

Downgrading is a bit off.. seems I had to select stable, then manually upload filename as it could not download properly from depository. The filename didnt match what it wanted to download, so I renamed my local copy from web and then manually copied, overwriting the partial download on the mikroti...
by nexusds
Thu Sep 26, 2019 7:01 am
Forum: General
Topic: RouterOS v7.0beta1 (ARM)
Replies: 203
Views: 61367

Re: RouterOS v7.0beta1 (ARM)

Bonding, at least with EoIP (utilizing PPPoE links) seems wonky.. some PPPoE clients dont have any upload traffic
by nexusds
Thu Sep 05, 2019 5:02 pm
Forum: General
Topic: DHCPv6 issue after upgrade to 6.45.1
Replies: 2
Views: 942

Re: DHCPv6 issue after upgrade to 6.45.1

PS - Still not resolved in testing 6.45.5
by nexusds
Thu Sep 05, 2019 5:01 pm
Forum: General
Topic: DHCPv6 issue after upgrade to 6.45.1
Replies: 2
Views: 942

Re: DHCPv6 issue after upgrade to 6.45.1

Apparently we may have narrowed this down to the PPPoE server not sending a proper IPv6 gateway option to the client router. not sure how to resolve this other than use a previous ROS version.
by nexusds
Fri Aug 16, 2019 7:10 am
Forum: General
Topic: DHCPv6 issue after upgrade to 6.45.1
Replies: 2
Views: 942

DHCPv6 issue after upgrade to 6.45.1

using Mikrotik as LNS, DHCPv6 is no longer binding to the PPPoE interfaces. anyone else see this issue or know if its been resolved (or what is causing it as I only see a few entries that I dont think are related) per 6.45.1 release notes; *) dhcpv6-server - added additional RADIUS parameters for Pr...