not yet in the meantime please send emails to Oskar at support@mikrotik.com and mention this specifically so he understands "Could RouterOS launch an option that allows you to disable the RFC4638 test. since my pppoe mtu defaults to 1480"

Make sure you are sending email to Oskar at support@mikrotik.com and mention this specifically so he understands "Could RouterOS launch an option that allows you to disable the RFC4638 test. since my pppoe mtu defaults to 1480"

Update !!! mikrotik is working on a implementation to disable RFC4638 test they emailed me the same..

Sorry to hear that...

I've implemented about 40 of them for internet connections on fire alarm panels and never had any problem with them...

Hi all,
so, this issue, CCR2004 rebooting, still not solved?

It's totally resolved after 7.3 update.

Hi all,
so, this issue, CCR2004 rebooting, still not solved?

But some users having issue in BGP.

With near 500 PPPoE users using ~600Mb/s down / ~200Mb/s up, the CCR1036-12G-4S have just 4% of CPU used...

This can be Done either with ROS or swOS...

Friends,

You would have some idea how to have the pppoe amount on top of a vlan which in turn is linked to pppoe-server as an interface. Prtg collection system.

Yes, it is a well known bug in winbox.
It appears it can sometimes be fixed by deleting the session (.viw) file but I have not observed that.

Enable ip cloud time update...

Hello,
why have you S+85DLC03DI SFP+ modules ?
The correct PN is S+85DLC03D, whitout "I".
"I" version have less distance capacity and other shortcomings.

Regards

Is this PSU issue still a problem when buying new CCR-1036 units or has this now been resolved?

i have resolved it

CCR1036-8G-2S+ with SFP+ modules, linked at 10G - unable to pass anything over 1.2Gbps...

Not impressed AT ALL with these devices currently.... Incredibly slow.

I'm working on this today....

Target[username]: \<pppoe-username\@udomain.net>:community@router.domain.net

seems to work.

+1 for MLPPP over multiple physical links in server configuration.

Is Cisco 2951 able to handle full BGP routes and can handle like 3Gbps ?

which cisco router do you use ?

Or Mikrotik could fix the behavior of the OSPF redistribution function.
Also - it would be nice if routing filters allowed you to set the cost metric when redistributing routes into OSPF...

have you tried the check-gateway feature? it should enable and dissable default routes if its unavalible

Use webfig to avoid it!

M.

That may be a client-side default route issue. I.e. each tunnel sets default route up during connect, thus breaking the other tunnel.

CCRs are very young devices, and yours has rather "old" firmware and RouterOS version... See this post: http://forum.mikrotik.com/viewtopic.php?p=508710

There's a FreeBSD program called mpd that can act as an MLPPP server. In addition you could buy a Juniper router but I guess that's not any better price wise then getting yourself a Cisco router.

No solved till now
we are just using workarounds

it is not possible because of the dynamic PPPOE Sessions

can anyone send me how to install dmasoftlab in ubuntu 12.04LTS? please send me link please in my inbox .. thanks

So under the WDS tab do you have Dynamic and the Bridge selected?

-Mac

dear can u post ur config i also need that...

thks in advance...

It is possible to play with port costs and achieve situation when download goes through one port and upload through another.

You probably have in hotspot servers - turned on adress pool , (and also dhcp server on same interface)... swich to none

Thanks, but I prefer to keep the discussion on this board, since it may be helpful to others!

Ya thanks I used that thread as help on setting up my network, I would have missed the horizon setting.

Thanks

read my reply above !

The max avaible...

Yes okay how many megabits per seconds / Mbps?

I'm not 100% sure on this, but are you certain that you don't have to memory actions that trigger on the same logs? I think to file should just log to file.

What throughput can one expect in this band?

you may establish another EoIP tunnel over the second connection, and then use bonding (either in Active, or in Adaptive mode) to bond those two tunnels

No one knows what we are doing here ??

is it not supported here in mikrotik

actually, color is not an indicator of limitation. for example, if max-limit=10M and actual throughput is ~8M, queue is red. but if it has limit-at=9M, limitation won't be applied until 9M throughput

actualy, in WinBox, green means that used bandwidth is 0-50% of max-limit, yellow = 50-75%, red = 75-100%

Make sure you are running the newest Ubiquiti firmware on your clients

"bla bla" eats my brain %)

There is no difference between bridge-bridge and bridge-station-wds for security/performance.

Is a Mikrotik fully compatibile with NanoStation M5 AirMax MIMO ?

these issues you should ask to manufacturers.

because miniPCI can't hold it - simple as that.

these are uvb (11,18,28GHz) devices. SAF Tehnika is Latvian company which developing uvb RF devices, such as Czech Alcoma.

Please, contact support (support@mikrotik.com) with the attached support output file.

do u know miniPCI voltages?

3.3V.. why?

and do you know uvb voltages?

This class device usually have indoor unit and outdoor RF unit. I think mPCI power resource is not enough to supply RF outdoor unit.

Yea, when I do that, I use the default username: admin and leave the password blank. Then when I go to connect, it waits a few seconds and then I get a message "Invalid Username or Password" and all I can do is click OK, and I am back to square one!

do u know miniPCI voltages?

did you find any?

magnavox, i can write an radius server for you, which is give reject packet the black listed mac : ) with mysql database, in windows platform. if you interest please send me a message

AP only allows the good MAC you know and drop everything else

if you are not planning to send streams i would suggest to look at igmp-proxy feature. It uses a lot less resources and is suitable for simple network topologies.

http://wiki.mikrotik.com/wiki/IGMP-Proxy

well, igmp-proxy is plain simple, just have to set up correct values in correct places.

here is description of it:
http://wiki.mikrotik.com/wiki/IGMP-Proxy

You can very likely find the source code for these helper apps by looking at the iptables sources. MT is a linux kernel and the firewall is based on iptables.

Ok! I disabled the connection-type=ftp. Accept related and established connections and it is now working.

Thank you for your assistance.

Heres a *virtual beer*

that is using radio plate with mikrotik?

only specific chipsets support this, we will add supported card list in a moment

I had two replys open and mixed the two... Sorry if I confused anyone.