MikroTik

tamahome

From winbox PPP > Interfaces > Double Click in a dynamic interface > Copy > Apply > OK

Before applying make sure you REMOVE the previos PPP Interface you are copying.

tamahome

You can make every pppoe session Static. This way the graph will dissapear every time the client disconnect, but when he connects again you will see all the graphs as a simple queue client.

tamahome

the rules does not work for ppp sessions. Only work for static IP addresses. What shoud I change to block torrent on PPP?

Thank you

tamahome

If I'm working with PPP the times you use out/in interface "e3" in the rules 2, 4 and 5, Should I replace it with "!WAN" to select not only the LAN interface but also the virtual ppp sessions? I entered manual all the lines the "\r\n" does not appear in the rules once e...

tamahome

info (at) tamax.com.ar

Should it stop the downloading once it is started or only works for new downloads?

Thank you

tamahome

sontrava, your two rules doesn't work for me. The utorrent keeps connecting and downloading.

tamahome

I'm having problems with the Queues.

After a few hours, Winbox doesn't show the simple queues or queue tree rules. If I print by Console, they are all there.

Did it happen to anyone?

tamahome

Ok, will do.

tamahome

it appears to work only upside down. I'm using connection-bytes to mark heavy download traffic (tcp 80). 5 ;;; http_more100Mb chain=prerouting action=mark-connection new-connection-mark=http_more100M_conn passthrough=yes protocol=tcp dst-port=80 connection-bytes=102400000-0 6 chain=prerouting action...

tamahome

I'm testing the rc13 in x86 and the connection-bytes still doesn't work. Is this normal?

tamahome

I've done it with Static PPPoE-Server for each user. This way the graphs doesn't dissapear every time the user logs in.

Is there any way to block PPPoE to make dynamic links and work only with static?

Thank you.

tamahome

Chupaca, Im trying as you suggested to create a pppoe server for each user. Will this generate more/less/equal CPU usage? Now I see that the interface does not appear in simple queue list, but still gets limit. Does it make any difference at all? Where the limit is taking place if not in the queue? ...

tamahome

I have not tried 5.8pre, I'm still waiting for the final version to see if it is a bug.

tamahome

I'm still having DNS problems. The service DNS seems to stop working. In tools > profile, seems right but the DNS cache list gets empty and stop caching and resolving host.

The only way to fix it is rebooting the RB1200.

tamahome

The legend is: while reading ip address: could not get answer from dns server

I'm putting the dns cache back to 1024k, I had it at 10240k for more caching.

I'll let you guys know if it happends again.

tamahome

So I should make a script that checks ping to google.com and reboot the router automatically or is there another way?

What is Mikrotik's opinion in this matter?

tamahome

When I had the problem I tried flushing the dns cache in the rb1200. It gets empty and it doesn't take any more request so I continue without browsing...

tamahome

I'm testing with my ISP DNS now, but if the DNS server is the problem shouldn't be solved by rebooting the rb1200.

tamahome

I have problems with the dns server. This is the second time this week that my Mikrotik RouterOS 5.7 Core DNS stopped responding. I try ping google from console and I get IP DNS error or something like that. I reboot the rb1200 and works fine for a few more days. This never happened to me with OS 5....

tamahome

241 PPP sessions consume 60% of the CPU, Is this normal? the LOCAL throughput is 16mb.

Thank you.

tamahome

I'm using RouterOS 5.6 but I am having the same issue. Almost 250 active ppp session and CPU usage is at 66% in the graphs.

The LAN interfaces is at 22mb. The CPU usage increase with more bandwidth.

tamahome

Even if the CPE can talk to each other?

tamahome

I don't want broadcast storms problems. Thats was what I was looking for to when I migrated my Fixed IP networks to PPPoE.

I have a wisp with over 200 clients and it was becoming a problem.

tamahome

It works great, but this will allow every client to communicate with each other, not only my admin IP.

Could I use scr-address with only my IP addres (192.168.201.1) to give access only my pc to every CPE on the network?

tamahome

Hello, I have a little problem now. It seems like the PCC load balance is redirecting all my traffic, even between CPEs. I have a PPPoE session for admin, the address is 192.168.201.1, all the CPE get access by PPPoE clientes in 192.168.201.0/24. Yesterday I could access all the CPE within the netwo...

tamahome

Thank you very much fewi, I already gave you + Karma,

Have a nice day.

tamahome

Do I also have to remove the "in-interface" indicator from the ACCEPT rules Like this? : 1 chain=input action=mark-connection new-connection-mark=wlan1_conn passthrough=yes in-interface=wlan1/ether2/telmex 2 chain=input action=mark-connection new-connection-mark=wlan2_conn passthrough=yes ...

tamahome

I have 4 WAN connections, How can I use in-interface=!WAN in this case? Should I put "!WAN" in every place where now is "Local" ? (lines from 9 to 36 in the PCC balance) I thought about the second router, leaving all the pcc balance in one and PPPoE server in other but as it is a...

tamahome

Hello, I am having a problem that I didn't have before with my PCC balance. I used to have my clients with fixed private IP address each and the PCC worked excelente. I got traffic in my 4 WAN interfaces. Yesterday I migrate all my clients connections to PPPoE, I created the PPPoE server, made the s...

tamahome

Does Mikrotik radios such as R52H or R5H have any offset or the Manual TX power that it set it the real TX power that I get?

Thank you.

tamahome

It doesnt change so often, but I asked support and told me that the IP can change if the have to move my hosting to another server. This things happend sometimes without the user even notice. I don't know where to use dyndns or noip.org if the dst address IP have to be enter manually on the webproxy...

tamahome

Hello, I did my configuration according to this tutorial (http://wiki.mikrotik.com/wiki/Payment_Reminders) It works great with a payment image I've got in my website. I specified the dst-address (xxxxxx) and use redirect to: http://xxxxxx/payment.png The only problem is that sometimes, the destinati...

tamahome

You can wait for the Ubiquiti Rocket M9, which operates en 900mhz, uses dual pol antennas and operates un TDMA.

tamahome

Ok, I will try the CLI configuration and let you know if I have any problem.

Thank you very much for your help and your time.

tamahome

oh I thought it was the part that says "reachable ether2" next to the Gateway IP.

tamahome

I see, because via winbox the gateway out interface is set automatically right?

tamahome

Hi, thanks for the quick reply. I use static IP address, routerOS 3.30 and have the routing-test installed, but not the routing package, Do I need both? Could you explain me a little more the CLI configuration? I want to understand what I am doing. I've never used "gateway=IP%Interface" Th...

tamahome

Hello, I have the same doubt Will PCC work correctly with two different WAN but from the same provider having the same Gateway? Also having the IP address in the same range if having the same gateway. Because the WIKI (http://wiki.mikrotik.com/wiki/PCC) shows only balance with different gateways and...

tamahome

I had XR9 but a link from another WISP made imposible to keep working. Trees are 25mts high at 300mts from the main tower. The link is kind of working now, with -80 signal but very very low bandwidth with 2.4 17db 120º sector panel, r52h b-only and 24db grid and another r52h. Im want to make this li...

tamahome

I need to make a 2.6km link with tall trees in between.

The main tower has 30mts and the repeater only 12mts. 900Mhz doesn't work due interference. Any idea to make a stable-no latency backhaul link?

tamahome

Hello, I'm having the same problem I'm doing PCC load balance with a cablemodem and a wimax connection. In wimax I have static IP, but in cablemodem I have dynamic IP, so the gateway may change. I wonder if it is possible creating a small router in the same port with VLAN, for example. ether3= 190.1...

tamahome

You were right, the ISP always give me the same Public IP Address. Althogh I am allow to work with 3 Public IPs that they gave me. I see if it is possible to create a DHCP who works only for the public MAC address interface and give IP address from a Public DHCP-pool. The problem would be getting th...

tamahome

Thank you very much, I'll try it this afternoon.

tamahome

Hello, I need help, I don't know anything about scripting and I don't even know where to look. I don't know if any script will work in Mikrotik 3.x or if it is all the same. I need to release and renew a dhcp client in the Public interface every day at 3am, so I don't have to reboot the routerboard....

tamahome

Hello, I had a very interesting problem, perhaps someone can give me a solution a client has a 900mhz PtP link between his work and his house with 2 RB411A and 2 yagi 13db antennas with XR9 his link started to had low CCQ so he decided to active nstream and the link automatically improved a lot. At ...

tamahome

So if I want to use the Burst I MUST use Simple Queue? Does any body has any other idea to make this more efficient? I don't want to use 200 simple queues for my users =/

Thanks.

tamahome

Hello, I have 3 kinds of clientes, 256k, 512k and 1mb. Previosly I used Simple Queue to limit the bandwidth by static IP for each user. The simple queue allows burst, so I 256k recived 512k for 30 second . A few weeks ago I change it all to PCQ and added QoS. Is it possible to apply burst in PCQ to ...

tamahome

I have 250 simple queue rules to limit traffic, 1 parent and 3 children (http, p2p, other) for each IP address in my network. The downside is that the last rule should pass all the other 249 rules to work so I was hopeing to learn how to do the same with queue tree. Now I use mangle so mark the 3 pa...

tamahome

Im trying to apply queue tree to 3 different kinds of traffics. I mangle by address list to limit the traffic by packets. Queue Tree limit the hole network so If I create a queue tree rule it would apply to 192.168.0.0/24. I need to apply the queue tree for each ip (192.168.0.0/32) Is this possible?...

tamahome

I tryed just as it said but it didnt work

tamahome

that was pretty cool, thank you very very much. It was exactly what I was looking for.

tamahome

anyone could help me?

tamahome

Hello, I have 256, 512k and 1mb clients, to give differents bandwidth Im using Simple Queue by IP like this 1 name="magi" target-addresses=192.168.0.100/32 dst-address=0.0.0.0/0 interface=all parent=none direction=both priority=5 queue=default-small/default-small limit-at=0/0 max-limit=256...

tamahome

UPDATE I could connect setting the AP as WDS mode Bridge: disable and WDS Default bridge: none in both AP and station. The station is now in station only, not wds and here is the new issue, even both SR9 are bridged(AP and CPE) into the main bridge1 wich connect them to internet, the CPE has no acce...

tamahome

I already tried both virtual and main interface as standard AP and its the same, the only way I can get a connection is by setting the ap as wds, dunno why either, maybe its and issue with the SR9, Im asking if anyone had the same problem or if it is a mistake in my config.

Thank you.

tamahome

no, the Virtual IP is not WDS, the WDS Mode is set in disable. are you saying that if the main interface has WDS enable the virtual would have it as well? eitherway I also try erasing the Virtual and set the main as AP bridge with WDS disable and the same keeps happening, cant connect if is not WDS....

tamahome

Hello, here its my problem. I have a RB333 with SR9 set as AP Bridge with and 8db omni antenna. The SR9 Main interface is set in WDS Mode: Dynamic and WDS Default Bridge: Bridge1 Bridge1 has all the interfaces bridges to him, SR9 main, SR9 Virtual AP and the 3 ethernet ports with only 1 in use The V...

tamahome

thank you so much, Ill try to wait for the RB433AH arrive to argentina.

tamahome

I need to buy a new RB for my WIPS, rb433 is the replacement for the rb333, but is really better? rb333 had a second co processor specially for network usage. Rb433 only has 1 cpu, does it really work better? cause rb433 is cheaper... Which RB will work better with 2 Ubiquiti XR2 for a WISP scenario...

tamahome

ooh, sorry for make you waste your time then, thank you so much for your support Chupaka.

topic closed =(

tamahome

hello, the masquerade rule doesnt specify the In Interface as Ether1 or in my case Local, but it has Public as Out Interface so shouldnt thist rule apply to all IN interfaces? about the pinging, I can ping the vlans from the mt server but not from the workstations, as if there were no routes or some...

tamahome

thank you so much, I didnt know that.

tamahome

Hi, Im having this issue, I cant upload files bigger than 2gb, it says server error cant copy the file or something like that, I have 76gb free in the mikrotik, I can upload files smaller than 2gb without any problem and all the files I want. But I have some dvd iso images that weight more that are ...

tamahome

[admin@SERVER] /ip firewall nat> print Flags: X - disabled, I - invalid, D - dynamic 0 chain=srcnat action=masquerade out-interface=Public [admin@SERVER] /ip firewall nat> what do you mean by TAG vlans? this masquerade works well with my Local interface and all the ips in there. my vlan was created ...

tamahome

Hi, here is my problem, I have set [admin@SERVER] /interface> print Flags: X - disabled, R - running, D - dynamic, S - slave # NAME TYPE MTU 0 R Local ether 1500 1 R lan2 ether 1500 2 R Public ether 1500 3 R vlan1 vlan 1500 4 R vlan2 vlan 1500 5 R vlan3 vlan 1500 [admin@SERVER] /interface> [admin@SE...

tamahome

hi, First, the channel Im using is 5, I already test all the other 10 channels and this one is the one I got less interference, my floor noise is -91, in other channels were -73 to -54, horrible. I have better experience with clients using 28db than less wich I had with my previous minipci card, bef...

tamahome

hi to all I have speed limited to 256k simetrical to all my clients, not only for p2p, I have the simple queue apply to the IP address so all IP traffic from that client should be limited, incluyed the p2p right? I manage my lan with 2mb simetrical wifi connection. I have CCQ at tx/rx 100%/0% in alm...

tamahome

the thing is I dont want to drop them, else my clients could not use p2p software and they will reclaim to me about it, why ares cant connect or emule doesnt download and stuff. I only want to limit them, I already drop all udp traffic except 53, and limit tcp connections to 25 per ip address (per c...

tamahome

a simple PCQ rule with divide the bandwidth among all users, I need to set diferent bandwidth to differents IP address I cant use NSTREAM cause edimax AP client antenas doesnt accept that mode. CPU utilizacion in RB333 is between 5 an 10% and in the x86 server less than 1%, I try erasing all the rul...

tamahome

Hi, I have 40 machines (26 wireless and 14 wired) in my lan, all at 192.168.0.x, from 192.168.0.2 to 192.168.0.26 are the IP from the wireless clientes computer, from 192.168.0.32 to 192.168.0.56 are the ip from the APs of clients (Im using edimax wifi 2.4 in all of them) and from 192.168.0.100 to 1...

tamahome

where do I need to put that?

I paste ":put [:resolve http://www.google.com]" in a terminal window and it gave me prompt again, nothing happened.

Thank you.

tamahome

yes, I was thinking the same, thank you for your time Sergejs

tamahome

are you talking about reverse the rule or the time?

the rule is drop TCP over 26 connections, syn. How can I reverse that rule?

and if I set the time from 1am to 8pm would drop in daytime not night time as I need.

sorry if I understood you wrong. Thank you Sergejs

tamahome

Hi, I have a little and maybe stupid problem, I want a firewall rule to work only from 8pm to 1am so I try to set the rule from 20hs to 1hs and it says wrong time, end time should be bigger than star time. So I can only set the rule to work from 20hs to 24hs (1 hour less than I need) what am I doing...

tamahome

Hi is there any way to check if the dns are working from the winbox or console in routeros V3? sometimes I have problems with my ISP and in my other server automatically says if the problem is with the DNS "DNS NOT RESPONDING" how can I check this in MT when Im having connections problems ...

tamahome

Hi, here is my problem I have a nat connection and im testing mikrotik to manage my hole network, first im tryin with my notebook, the MT server has 1 public ip and NAT to the rest. I copy the wiki examples from traffic shaper and the limit to my notebook seems to work fine, it was limit to 110k up ...

tamahome

do I have to mark packets or something to make a simple queue to work? Ive got this queue 1 name="192.168.0.100" target-addresses=192.168.0.100/32 dst-address=0.0.0.0/0 interface=all parent=none packet-marks="" direction=both priority=8 queue=default-small/default-small limit-at=...

tamahome

Im using V3 and simple queue works for direct downloads, but not for p2p like ares and the same issue with pppoe but in the simple queue if you select a p2p or a packet mark even my packet mark marks all traffic 0 chain=prerouting action=mark-connection new-connection-mark=ALL-Connections passthroug...

tamahome

if I select a packet mark udp_!53 the simple queue just stop working and the downloads go to 2mb the max of my connection. If I dont select the packet mark in the queue works just fine but only for direct download, the rule doesnt apply to Ares P2P for example. Also if in the simple queue I set the ...

tamahome

Hi, is it possible that the bandwidth limit set up in a simple queue doesnt limit udp packets? this is my queue Flags: X - disabled, I - invalid, D - dynamic 0 name="192.168.0.100" target-addresses=192.168.0.100/32 dst-address=0.0.0.0/0 interface=all parent=none direction=both priority=1 q...

tamahome

no I think the tcp limit is set to low, as I said before any P2P software could easly establish 100 tcp connections and your rule is set to 10 connections and above.

tamahome

I dont know much about it but the first rule allow only 1 tcp connection for the ips in your black list to prevent Denial of Service attacks with establish a lot of tcp connections to bring down the service the second rule add to your black list the ip of machines who attempt more than 10 connection...

tamahome

we doesnt need to identigy what kind of traffic is it, the only issue is that the router doesnt limit everything that came in or out of that ip, I dont know why this is a problem the clarkconnect router gateway manage to do the bandwidth without any problem and its kind of a crappy OS I guess my con...

tamahome

Im trying MT only with my laptop for testing and configuration, I limit to 64k/256k by static IP and as soon as I open Ares the downloads go up to 100k(real download) even its limited. I have a clarkconnect software as router in my other server, it has so many limitations but it works fine with the ...

tamahome

both interfaces were connected to the switch because my wireless suscriber give me 3 publics ip but it need to connect the suscriber to the switch and every server to the switch too in order to get the internet and the ether1 back to the switch to use the mikrotik anyway the problem is fix, only nee...

tamahome

I have the same problem Im trying MT only with my laptop for testing and configuration, Im limited to 64k/256k by static IP and as soon as I open Ares the downloads go up to 100k even its limited. I have a clarkconnect software as router in my other server, it has so many limitations but it works fi...

tamahome

Hi Im new here. Im trying to setup a mikrotik routeros 3.0rc3 in my computer to use it as gateway I just installed mikrotik so it has cero configuration I have 3 ethernet interfases, eth1 (lan with ip 192.168.0.101) wich i want to bridge with ether3 (onboard lan with wan interfase), eth2 is not in u...

Search found 87 matches