Community discussions

MikroTik App

Search found 13 matches

by reddin
Thu Sep 09, 2021 7:27 pm
Forum: Containers
Topic: v7.1rc3 adds container support
Replies: 493
Views: 163089

Re: v7.1rc3 adds Docker (TM) compatible container support

Anyone tried running adguard?
https://hub.docker.com/r/adguard/adguardhome
Working just fune


Image
by reddin
Thu Sep 09, 2021 8:24 am
Forum: Containers
Topic: v7.1rc3 adds container support
Replies: 493
Views: 163089

Re: v7.1rc3 adds Docker (TM) compatible container support

SSH in containers isn't working right now. Just tried it. PTY allocation request failed on channel 0 Does the container have a devpts filesystem mounted? Try running: mount | grep ^devpts If nothing is returned then try mounting it (probably won't work given the container environment, but it's wort...
by reddin
Wed Sep 08, 2021 7:24 pm
Forum: Containers
Topic: v7.1rc3 adds container support
Replies: 493
Views: 163089

Re: v7.1rc3 adds Docker (TM) compatible container support

Currently the limiting factor is finding or creating a container file for said architecture. Yeah, already trying to make container with basic busybox and it's not easy. @krisjanisj: It would be great to share basic busybox containers with SSH server for different architectures if you have them. Th...
by reddin
Wed Sep 08, 2021 6:23 pm
Forum: Containers
Topic: v7.1rc3 adds container support
Replies: 493
Views: 163089

Re: v7.1rc3 adds Docker (TM) compatible container support

Anyone managed to make dns in container work? I added dns="1.1.1.1" to container and still no luck. Of course you need to configure working routing for this kind of thing to work. Including NAT, usually. See the documentation page. You were correct. Totally forgot about nat because in lin...
by reddin
Wed Sep 08, 2021 5:52 pm
Forum: Containers
Topic: v7.1rc3 adds container support
Replies: 493
Views: 163089

Re: v7.1rc3 adds Docker (TM) compatible container support

Anyone managed to make dns in container work?
I added dns="1.1.1.1" to container and still no luck. This is what I get from container
ResolveHostName failed error: -3 (Try again) 22
by reddin
Thu Sep 10, 2020 4:53 am
Forum: RouterOS beta
Topic: v7.1beta2 [development] is released!
Replies: 385
Views: 154580

Re: v7.1beta2 [development] is released!

Wireguard does not connect from Mikrotik behind NAT to a Linux server with a white IP.
I've tried to connect like this to a dozen of a servers and everything worked well enough for me.

I've been wondering is it possible to generate keys on mikrotik for wireguard peers?
by reddin
Sat Aug 22, 2020 3:48 am
Forum: RouterOS beta
Topic: v7.1beta2 [development] is released!
Replies: 385
Views: 154580

Re: v7.1beta2 [development] is released!

Can't add key in wireguard via cli with "=" at the end. But can add it later via edit and can add it via gui.
by reddin
Fri Aug 21, 2020 5:04 pm
Forum: RouterOS beta
Topic: v7.1beta2 [development] is released!
Replies: 385
Views: 154580

Re: v7.1beta2 [development] is released!

The second one is about wireguard. Why I can't specify the port number for peer? Is it intended or a bug as well?
in comments above is said to use cli for now, probably winbox is not yet updated to include gui for wireguard
Yeah, it works via cli, thanks.
by reddin
Fri Aug 21, 2020 4:38 pm
Forum: RouterOS beta
Topic: v7.1beta2 [development] is released!
Replies: 385
Views: 154580

Re: v7.1beta2 [development] is released!

Hello!
Just upgraded to v7.1b2 and spotted a few issues:
First and most important is routing marks don't work
The second one is about wireguard. Why I can't specify the port number for peer? Is it intended or a bug as well?
by reddin
Sun Aug 09, 2020 2:25 pm
Forum: RouterOS beta
Topic: Feature Request - Wireguard Protocol
Replies: 167
Views: 84577

Re: Feature Request - Wireguard Protocol

Finally. All I could dream for
by reddin
Thu May 14, 2020 11:08 pm
Forum: General
Topic: drop forward invalid issue
Replies: 2
Views: 1562

Re: drop forward invalid issue

My guess: routing triangle. When phone, unaware of wireguard tunnel, contacts a remote server, packet goes: phone - cap (transparently) - rb (routing) - wireguard-gw - ... and on the way back ... - wireguard-gw - cap (transparently) - phone ... skipping the rb4011 and thus screwing its connection t...
by reddin
Thu May 14, 2020 11:13 am
Forum: General
Topic: drop forward invalid issue
Replies: 2
Views: 1562

drop forward invalid issue

Hello everyone. I found one weird issue that keeps on going. So, the basics: I have a simple firewall setup that accepts forward established, related and drop forward invalid. The issue: not long ago I configured myself a wireguard gateway (running on Ubuntu VM inside my local subnet) for certain we...
by reddin
Mon May 04, 2020 11:48 pm
Forum: RouterOS beta
Topic: Feature Request - Wireguard Protocol
Replies: 167
Views: 84577

Re: Feature Request - Wireguard Protocol

I'm 100% sure that this is a must feature for ROS v7. Please, mikrotik, make my dreams come true 8)